Minn. Farmer Charged After Chasing Thief - Page 2

Minn. Farmer Charged After Chasing Thief

This is a discussion on Minn. Farmer Charged After Chasing Thief within the In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly forums, part of the The Back Porch category; It would be nice to hear the whole story. At gunpoint ,over property is not right ,if that is what happened. On the other hand ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Minn. Farmer Charged After Chasing Thief

  1. #16
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,158
    It would be nice to hear the whole story. At gunpoint ,over property is not right ,if that is what happened. On the other hand , how many of us would investigate a noise at night w/o a gun on em?
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset


  2. #17
    Distinguished Member Array randytulsa2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,548
    Hopefully the thief will think twice before siphoning gas (if that's how he was stealing it) from someone else again.

    And I hope the old fellow will come out of this OK.

    His reaction to the thief and the theft reminds me of the reaction of the Ben Stiller character in the opening sequence of "Starskey and Hutch": "There are no minor crimes....".
    "...bad decisions that turn out well often make heroes."


    Gary D. Mitchell, A Sniper's Journey: The Truth About the Man and the Rifle, P. 103, NAL Caliber books, 2006, 1st Ed.

  3. #18
    VIP Member
    Array goawayfarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fork Union, Virginia
    Posts
    2,699
    Read this other story:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16942458/

    It seems Chicago Sun-Times left out part of the story!

    This miscreant was wanted on other FELONY charges:

    Smith was charged with another theft and was held in the county jail on a felony warrant from another state.
    While the 'vigilante' may not have shown the best judgment....another WANTED FELON IS OFF THE STREETS!.

    Another thing is the nearest LEOs are 15 miles away! So this community is on it's own!

    If it had been me, I would have had a loaded gun (his shotgun WASN'T loaded).

    It also looks like this man INTERRUPTED the thief, who knows what the BG here was planning........it was probably more than just stealing a LITTLE GASOLINE!
    Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.-Seneca

    "If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. If I have a gun, what do I have to be paranoid about?" -Clint Smith

    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Jeff Cooper

  4. #19
    VIP Member
    Array Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The Old Dominion
    Posts
    5,050
    Merged the two running threads on this incident.
    Procrastinators are the leaders of tomorrow.

  5. #20
    Distinguished Member Array Colin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    1,863
    My understanding that the shotgun was unloaded, in which case I wonder if the cell phone call was done in front of the BG's to intimidate them? I suspect that living in a town with no police force would naturally make people a bit more pro-active in the defense of their property and perhaps they have had past problems with people stealing stuff and getting away before the police arrive and this situation was the straw that broke the camel’s back?

  6. #21
    Member Array Cocolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    41
    I know this is my first post, but didn't the article mentioned his township did not have a police force so it was common for people to get away because there was no police presence? Maybe the fact that something like this happened before once or twice may have affected his better judgement. I am not saying he did the right thing in any way shape or form, he actually did everything wrong by chasing and pointing a gun at someone without being a LEO.

  7. #22
    Member Array plblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    284
    OK, here's my take on this:

    I respect a 74 year old man that has the guts to defend his neighbors' property. I can understand the difference between Metro and Rural sensibilities and the decision not to be or allow his neighbors to be victimized.

    BUT (you knew it was coming)

    Let's remember how the situation was AT THE TIME it happened. No 20/20 hindsight. Reasonable person rules apply here...

    a) he DIDN'T know a crime had been committed... the perp confessed to $5 of gas siphoning done at another time and he did that only later to the police

    b) the FELONY info didn't come out until later(Why the police didn't run the perp's info is another rant)

    c) he held a man AND his wife / child at gunpoint AFTER chasing them at 70 mph on rural roads

    d) never, at any time in the story, has there been any threat of Gross Bodily Harm / Death from anyone but the Old Guy.

    As it turns out, England (74yo man) was right, a crime had been committed and the perp was a wanted FELON. There was STILL no Felony comitted, no threat of GBH/D and it was NOT IN England's house. in MN, according to the law, he hasn't a leg to stand on. You can defend your dwelling using lethal force if a felony is being comitted, or GBH/Death is threatened. At night IIRC, GBH/D is assumed. Note: This ONLY applies ot the dwelling (house) not the property lines or out buildings. There, it's back to GBH/Death threatened to self or others.

    Personally, I believe the blow away comment was bluster to keep the situation under control. I also believe they could have charged him with more than Assault 2. It just happens to be the lowest felony they can charge him with where after plea he will lose his firearm rights.

    Let me paint a hypothetical...

    1) they let him go
    2) next month, my family and I are in the area and follow poor directions to look up Cousin Timmy we haven't seen in years... No one is home the first time we stop, but the next day, when we stop back, Bucky the macho 21 yo neighbor remembers Mr. England the Hero and pulls a repeat...

    3) Bucky chases me and my family at 70Mph on rural roads
    4) 911 is miles away and my car gets stopped
    5) Bucky has a shotgun and is coming at my FAMILY

    the S is about to HTF in a big way. Bucky is NOT going to threaten my family. This is about to get real ugly for all involved and we're all going to wish it didn't happen later. But I would consider GBH/Death to be in play and would respond accordingly if forced to. And the clock is ticking.

    Flipping it a bit, imagine it was all a mistake and England braced you and yours with a shotgun (you don't know it was unloaded) ... there is GOING to be a problem.

    THAT is why he is being charged. The law is very specific. The prosecutor has latitude as do the police but the chances for this to have gone VERY wrong and / or result in a copycat event are incredibly scary.

    Like I said, I can respect and understand what he did. I hope he gets out of this as unscathed as possible. but I DO NOT want a repeat. The law makes sense in this case.
    Last edited by plblark; February 5th, 2007 at 04:57 PM. Reason: clarify dense of dwelling in MN
    For MN specific carry information and a great shooting community, check out forum.twincitiescarry.com

  8. #23
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    45,340

    Chase No One...

    Who can run faster than 1,200 feet/second...

    fet
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

  9. #24
    Member Array The Sage of Seattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by lowflyer View Post

    As I understand it, the power to detain and/or apprehend is one of the little things that grants police authority over citizens.

    Citizen's arrest, as far as I know, is not something that can be carried out fully unless a LEO is present to do the detainment part.

    Anybody know the law on this?
    IANAL, but I understand that a felony must be in the process of being committed in your presence in order to perform a citizens' arrest. At that point, you may use any force reasonable and necessary in detaining the suspect, up to and including deadly force.

    In this case, going after the guy was a foolish thing to do, in my opinion. On the other hand, he did eventually capture a wanted felon so I'd hope that those extenuating circumstances will be used on his behalf.
    "Don't mistake my kindness for weakness."
    -Me (I think)

    "A divided government means a happy constituancy!"
    -Me

    "Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility."
    -Dietrich Bonhoeffer

  10. #25
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27,876
    Quote Originally Posted by The Sage of Seattle View Post
    IANAL, but I understand that a felony must be in the process of being committed in your presence in order to perform a citizens' arrest.
    Since we're on combatcarry.com and discussing the use of firearms ... the criteria taught by the Lethal Force Institute for stopping a fleeing felon using deadly force includes the following six criteria:
    1. Heinous Felony: The crime must be heinous, violent and against a person.
    2. Known To Me As The Perpetrator: The criminal must be personally known to me as the perpetrator of the crime.
    3. Be Identifiable As The Good Guy: I, as the defender, must take the justifiable actions of a “good guy” and be legally seen as such.
    4. Escape Is Open-Ended: Absent my intervention, there is a reasonable probability that the escape of the criminal will result in similar crimes.
    5. All other means have failed or are impossible.
    6. Clear & Present Danger To Others: The criminal’s continued freedom presents a clear & present danger to innocents.


    That's a pretty stiff standard. The goal being to present criteria that will withstand scrutiny anywhere in the USA, irrespective of whether a given state grants the ability earlier or not. The standard for a garden-variety citizen's arrest (not requiring lethal force) is a bit lower, as I understand it. Perhaps some of our LEO's can fill in the blanks, in this regard.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Man shoots at fleeing thief, not charged
    By phreddy in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: March 5th, 2011, 03:10 PM
  2. French Truffle Thief Killed By Farmer
    By nutz4utwo in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: December 23rd, 2010, 11:18 PM
  3. Hi from Minn .
    By kennymn in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: April 9th, 2010, 06:59 PM
  4. Greetings from Minn
    By Jex in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: February 22nd, 2009, 08:40 PM
  5. Ugly: 2 teens charged in killings of Minn. mother, son
    By falcon1 in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: June 22nd, 2008, 03:57 PM

Search tags for this page

detain thief at gunpoint california

Click on a term to search for related topics.