Mandatory gun insurance - What a joke!!!

Mandatory gun insurance - What a joke!!!

This is a discussion on Mandatory gun insurance - What a joke!!! within the In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Gerald Sindell: Why Not Gun Insurance? An Invitation to the NRA Bob Herbert's impassioned column in the NY Times this morning, "A Culture Soaked in ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Mandatory gun insurance - What a joke!!!

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array boricua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,873

    Mandatory gun insurance - What a joke!!!

    Gerald Sindell: Why Not Gun Insurance? An Invitation to the NRA



    Bob Herbert's impassioned column in the NY Times this morning, "A Culture Soaked in Blood," reviews the insanity of the role of guns in our society. 100,000 people a year are shot, 30,000 die. Average that for ten years, it's a million people shot, 300,000 die. That's the same as 600 Boeing 747s full of 500 people blowing up. How can we as a society continue to tolerate this slaughter?

    I have a partial solution to offer. One that people on both sides of the Second Amendment debate might find acceptable. One that the NRA might be able to endorse. And one that will have the mighty insurance industry jumping for joy.

    When I first came up with this idea, I was working with Ralph Nader on a book, and he said that the idea made sense to him. I was also working with Vincent Bugliosi at the time (on a book to solve the drug problem in America) and Vince also thought the idea has merit.

    It's a simple idea, and is modeled on the same concepts that give us car insurance. Guns, like cars, can cause injury. Therefore, everyone who drives a car is required to carry insurance against the possible damage that might be caused by the car. Even if the car is stolen, the damage it causes can be covered, with some exceptions if you leave your keys in the car, for instance.

    So what would gun insurance look like? The states would require that anyone who owns a gun needs to insure it. If your gun is in a good gun safe, or not operable, your rates would be lower. If you had teenagers in your house and they had access to the guns, insurance would be higher. If you had a criminal record, your rates could be pretty steep. If you had trigger locks, you might get a discount. Get certified in gun use, maybe another discount. Register the forensics of your gun with the FBI, and you get another discount. It's your choice. Like cars, your zip code might have an effect on your rates, just as high accident rate areas for autos pay higher auto insurance.

    What would the insurance cover? Gunshot wounds directly cost some $2 billion dollars a year, according to Herbert. So gun insurance would help with medical bills and funeral expenses. Wrongful death, loss of a supporting parent or partner, and damages to property would all be covered. Many gun owners would want to carry insurance against injury by uninsured gun owners. And I'll bet that a lot of those folks who don't own guns would want non-gun owner insurance against uninsured gun owners, if it was offered. Clearly, the opportunities for the insurance industry would be limited only by their imaginations.

    Would gun insurance lower the national rate of injury and death from guns? Probably. If owners get a discount on their insurance if they lock up their guns and use trigger locks, that would certainly help. If the penalties for possessing a gun that isn't insured were stiff enough, that would help too. What kind of penalties? If your car is not insured and you get stopped, it gets towed. You get it back when you prove you have insurance. Same for your gun. Your uninsured gun is used in a crime? Penalty goes up. And you probably won't be able to get insurance.

    What do you say, NRA members? Surely in the new spirit of President Obama, where we are all trying to solve long festering problems by using fresh thinking, hopefully some of you will agree that this is a healthy step toward responsible gun ownership.

    Can we find some common ground here?

    ***********************************************

    This was written by Gerald Sindell, author of "The Genius Machine"

    That's "genius," alright....
    Duty, Honor, Country...MEDIC!!!
    ¡Cuánto duele crecer, cuan hondo es el dolor de alzarse en puntillas y observar con temblores de angustia, esa cosa tremenda, que es la vida del hombre! - René Marqués


  2. #2
    Distinguished Member Array P7fanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Texan in NWFlorida
    Posts
    1,588

    Cool

    You'd think the guy must be a lobbyist for the insurance industry.
    Without looking at statistics I would estimate that no less than 95-98% of gun deaths are at the hand of LEO's in the commision of their duties and criminals. So are we going to make sure that LE and all criminals have this mandatory 'gun insurance' first?
    In my eyes this is just another end around idea at ways to register, control and make the ownership of guns cost prohibitive.
    Other than that I just consider it a stupid idea. That's my 2 cents.



    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." -Thomas Jefferson

    "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder." -Michael Savage

    GOOD Gun Control is being able to hit your target! -Myself

  3. #3
    Distinguished Member Array Siafu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    East Jahunga
    Posts
    1,424
    Based on the statistical probability of having to discharge a firearm in defense amortized over the life of the owner I'd say the premiums would have to be pretty low.

    After all, there are police officers, and many of them to boot, who never even have to fire a weapon at an assailant over the course of their career. They are in the business of gun slinging and they don't, so imagine how much lower the probability is for the average Joe-six-pack.

    How much can the premium be? $10 year? Not that I want to pay it but there would have to be some actuarial justification for the rates. They couldn't just make up a number that "felt good". I'm more concerned about Swine Flu than gun insurance, and I don't think Swine Flu will amount to anything more that a fear-based ratings grab for the main-stream media.

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    44,854
    There should be a mandatory 'stupidity' insurance for politicians and news reporters ...

    Just curious, but what about the 'required' insurance for driving that so many idiots drive around without...I have to pay EXTRA for uninsured motorists...so I'm paying twice.
    Oh wait a minute, I'm sure all the gang-bangers and other assorted dirtbags will be getting their policies...yeah, right!
    Last edited by RETSUPT99; April 26th, 2009 at 10:18 PM.
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Array matdicdad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    SE Virginia
    Posts
    1,132
    This is a "Progressive" idea, read socialist. To me, completely unacceptable. This is another veiled attempt to eliminate my God given 2nd ammendmant rights. Basically it's nuts.

  6. #6
    Distinguished Member Array bandit383's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,681
    This is bad anyway you cut it...a money grab using guns as the hostage.

    The only optional insurance I would want is legal costs if using a weapon in defense. Outside of that...an attempt to find some way, some how, to limit gun ownership by making insurance mandatory.

  7. #7
    Member Array chepo06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Houston , TX
    Posts
    194
    Insurance?

  8. #8
    Member Array zachgry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kountze, Texas
    Posts
    33
    BAD Idea! Its just another way to limit and control your rights. What if you couldnt afford the insurance? would that mean you couldnt own a gun? and how much would it cost? 200 or more a month? Also if you lived in the bad side of town would you be charged more? This is just another way to rid your 2a rights because if you couldnt afford it then they wouldnt let you have it.

    The right to keep and bear arms(only if you have insurance)
    Again bad idea..
    ""If you dont like America than get the hell out"".

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array Hollow Point's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Mississippi
    Posts
    523
    IMO this will only open Pandora's Box. I live about 5 miles from the Gulf Of Mexico in Gulfport, Ms where Hurricane Katrina came through. Anyone who thinks this is a good idea should do a little research not much on insurance company's. They refused to pay on many lost item's and a lot of lawsuites were filed. I have insurance because here I have to it is the law or a policy of a finance company. I guess my point is insurance companys can change there rules anytime they want before or after the fact and you can't do a thing about it because they ALL make these same rules changes. I can go on and on but I will leave it here. Only my 2 cents

  10. #10
    VIP Member Array sgtD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,292
    When I first came up with this idea, I was working with Ralph Nader on a book, and he said that the idea made sense to him. .
    yep, that's where I quit reading. Told me all I needed to know.
    When you've got 'em by the balls, their hearts & minds will follow. Semper Fi.

  11. #11
    VIP Member Array JoJoGunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    2,929
    Now just hold on here a minute. I thought my firearm WAS insurance. You know.....the bumper stickers that read "This vehicle/home/person is insured by Smith & Wesson" I know that I'm insured by that (see my avatar pic for my "insurance" policy.)

    And who is going to enforce purchase of said insurance on our less-than-law abiding citizens? The Brady Campaign? They seem to be so efficient at reducing gun crime, so are they up to the challenge? Pardon me while I empty the contents of my stomach into the trash can.

    I don't care if premiums are a dollar a year or whatever, it just won't work.
    "A Smith & Wesson always beats 4 aces!"

    The Man Prayer. "Im a man, I can change, if I have to.....I guess!" ~ Red Green

  12. #12
    Ex Member Array PNUT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    913
    I can just see all of the criminals with their illegal and stolen guns lining up to pay insurance, what a douche this guy is.

  13. #13
    Distinguished Member Array Bunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    North Carolina - LKN
    Posts
    1,384
    I immediately tuned out at the following:

    1) "A Culture Soaked in Blood," reviews
    and
    2) the insanity of the role of guns in our society.

  14. #14
    VIP Member
    Array DaveH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Posts
    5,036

    Thumbs down Cold mashed potatoes

    Rehashing cold mashed potatoes.

    Nearly ever anti-group floats this end run idea from time to time. Shows up regularly in LTEs.

    See: http://www.defensivecarry.com/vbulle...insurance.html

    However, we need to reply to the papers, not just grouse among ourselves here and on other Pro list.
    Μολὼν λαβέ

    I'm just one root in a grassroots organization. No one should assume that I speak for the VCDL.

    I am neither an attorney-at-law nor I do play one on television or on the internet. No one should assumes my opinion is legal advice.

    Veni, Vidi, Velcro

  15. #15
    Member Array Tigrebleau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    99
    I doubt the accuracy of the 30,000 gunshot deaths per year. I would believe that nearly all of the non-LEO-involved shootings are by people who would never buy this "insurance" anyway. The only people who would (or could be coerced to) buy this are those we don't have to worry about.
    I'll give you an actual statistic these people should be worrying about: between 50,000 and 90,000 Americans die in hospitals every year from medication errors. If these "humanitarians" are so worried about saving lives, they should work on that.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Sig 238 Safey Update: MANDATORY!
    By JD in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: February 19th, 2010, 09:43 AM
  2. Do you think additional training should be mandatory to carry concealed?
    By Tally XD in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: September 10th, 2009, 07:59 AM
  3. Insurance
    By DaveInTexas in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: November 17th, 2008, 11:31 PM
  4. Beginning shooter ... .22 mandatory????
    By Interloper in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: April 18th, 2007, 02:23 PM
  5. New mandatory warning on guns.
    By Bumper in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 3rd, 2006, 12:31 AM

Search tags for this page

gun owner optional insurance

,
mandatory firearm insurance
,

mandatory gun insurance

,
mandatory gun insurance nj
Click on a term to search for related topics.