August 13th, 2009 09:17 AM
Good Letter to the Editor
Richmond Times Dispatch, Richmond Va
Letters: Gun Statistics Can Be Misleading | Richmond Times-Dispatch
Gun Statistics Can Be Misleading
Editor, Times-Dispatch: Michael Paul Williams, in his column, "Patron With Gun Won -- That Time," has succeeded in misrepresenting the number of instances of self-defense by citizens using a gun that occur in the U.S. He has done so by his failure to do basic research into the matter and then compounded his mistake by relying on the notorious gun-ban organization, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Its statement that no more than 100 or 200 instances of self-defense by citizens occur in the U.S. each year (its Web site and various references to that statistic in public speeches by the Brady people vary according to its audience) is incorrect.
Several studies by reputable researchers have estimated that from 800,000 to more than 1 million assaults, rapes, robberies, carjackings, and other attempted violent crimes are ended by the presence of an armed citizen. While the Brady Campaign statistic refers to instances when the perpetrator is killed, what usually happens is that the intended victim of a violent predator merely lets the predator know that he or she is armed, which almost invariably ends the episode.
For Williams to rely on such obvious misinformation from only one side of this issue is a violation of journalistic integrity. The Brady Campaign from its inception was incorporated as the Brady Center to Ban Handguns but changed its name to reflect the softer, more reasonable-sounding Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Make no mistake about it, though, the Brady bunch will misrepresent facts to suit its agenda. It will also use horrendous events like the Virginia Tech murders to advance its agenda. Every time there has been gun violence in this country the Brady bunch has been there with its call for draconian measures to strip citizens of their natural right to self-defense.
Williams should be ashamed of himself. Even in an opinion piece the writer should be aware of the facts available to him from all sides.
I'm just one root in a grassroots organization. No one should assume that I speak for the VCDL.
I am neither an attorney-at-law nor I do play one on television or on the internet. No one should assumes my opinion is legal advice.
Veni, Vidi, Velcro
August 13th, 2009 09:37 AM
Paul Williams write a biased, slanted, egregiously erroneous article? I'm shocked...shocked, I tell ya.
August 13th, 2009 12:03 PM
It is progress, however. Many times in the past, the anti-gunners would completely ignore any successful defense with a gun stories, and pretend these never happen. Looks like it is getting harder for them to maintain this position...
Anti-gunners seem to believe that if we just pass enough laws, we can have utopia. Unfortunately, utopia is NOT one of our choices.
By ImaShepardRU in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: March 14th, 2011, 06:23 PM
By DaveH in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: February 26th, 2010, 06:18 PM
By DaveH in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Last Post: September 9th, 2009, 07:17 PM
By DaveH in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: June 29th, 2009, 07:28 AM
By treksouth in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Last Post: August 9th, 2008, 05:39 PM
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors