This is a discussion on Dark Knight Shooting Victims Might Sue Theater Chain within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Originally Posted by PIMking Then swimming pools shouldnt have life guards, if you pay and chose to go swimming they shouldn't be liable for you ...
"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast." - Ephesians 2:8-9
“The purpose of the law is not to prevent a future offense, but to punish the one actually committed” - Ayn Rand
The theater provided security if I recall correctly with an off duty cop. How much security is needed?
I have been pretty clear on this- If you assume a risk: too bleeping bad. I am sick of cry babies in this country. If this case was about somethng other than a no gun sign a lot of folks on this forum would be throwing down a BS flag on the law suit. Many folks here are only defending the law suit because it involves guns.
This is not a case of a fire door being locked (against the law) and a fire starting which is a valid law suit and crimminal action.
The "danger" was posted. The BG planned this attack. It was not a willy nilly knee jerk nutcase. I can what if the situation to death where a CC'er could not have prevented the amount of deaths. He could have snuck an Uzi in and moved as he fired close to the rows giving hardly anybody any warning....what kind of security do you want?
Metal detectors? Armed security guards with NVG's patrolling the aisle's?
Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?”
And I said, “Here am I. Send me!”