Just came across this today. All you poker playin' criminals need to read this.....
http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opin...s/SC/27197.pdf
This is a discussion on Poker now illegal in your own home in SC within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Just came across this today. All you poker playin' criminals need to read this..... http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opin...s/SC/27197.pdf...
Just came across this today. All you poker playin' criminals need to read this.....
http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opin...s/SC/27197.pdf
With all the "interesting" issues the S.C. Legislature might address, I'm sure relieved they choose to take a stand on something so, um...vital. Sounds like someone's been handin' out plain-brown envelopes around the State House lobbying for casino-only gambling. IMHO, it's a gamble just being a Steve Spurrier fan.![]()
There are only TWO kinds of people in this world; those that describe the world as filled with two kinds of people...and those who don't.
What're we supposed to do this weekend now!?! The whole family is visiting and we need entertainment. I've got a full house!
I guess we'll flush our plans and hit the clubs (the straight clubs)
If 'mental illness' is a main cause of gun-grabbing sentiments, then mental illness is the true enemy.
The March of Dimes worked. There's an opportunity there for being pro-active in defense of your rights.
Alternatlvely, please just actually give actual money occasionally.
That sucks. For some reason "strip bingo" just doesn't seem as appealing
Infowars- Proving David Hannum right on a daily basis
It looks like someone needs to suggest a poker game to the AG at some gathering!
What determines a place to be a "house of gaming?"
"If you make something idiot proof, someone will make a better idiot."
- Anon
I understand your post, but having observed this kind of legislation in the past, it seems to me that it was determined that certain actions must occur in order to declare a location a "house of gaming." As I recall, one of the requirements is that monies must be paid to the operator/house, either as an admission fee, or a "cut of the take," in order to be declared a "house of gaming."
I may be wrong, and I am not a lawyer, but as an old fart, I remember this kind of thing has come up in tha past when I lived in either Missouri, or Alabama.
"If you make something idiot proof, someone will make a better idiot."
- Anon
not arguing you my friend. that was actuyally a sarcastic remark.
Below is how it reads in part of the ruling. I read in another area of the ruling where collection of monies for any food, drinks or other items, whether it be from the players' own money or from the pot may be what makes it a "house of gaming". Will have to read more into it.
The statute, with its modern punctuation, provides:
(1) Any person who plays or shall bet on the sides or hands of such as do game at any
tavern inn store for the retailing of spirituous liquors house used as a place of gaming barn kitchen stable other outhouse street highway open wood race field open place
4 1909 S.C. Acts No. 43, § 1 p. 66.
(2) at
a) any game with cards or dice b) 1. any gaming table, commonly called A, B, C, or E, O
2. any other gaming table known or distinguished
by any other letters or by any figures c) any roley-poley table d) rouge et noir e) any faro bank f) any other table or bank of the same or like kind under
any denomination whatsoever or g) any licensed gambling machine or device
except at
billiards
bowls
backgammon
chess
draughts or
whist
when there is no betting on any such game of billiards through whist
(3)
shall be guilty
and
(4)
every person so keeping such
tavern
inn
retail store
public place or
house used as a place for gaming or
such other house
(5 ) shall be guilty.
Well, the State isn't getting theirs, if it's done in the shadows. Can't skim from unlicensed betting parlors.![]()
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
NRA, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.
No problem, deadguy. Just reminiscing.
"If you make something idiot proof, someone will make a better idiot."
- Anon
Georgia has had a similar law as long as I remember with the owner of the property liable for a felony though current research finds it's just a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. It's not about casino-only there, as there are no casinos. Just nanny-state no-no's. Poker is one reason I enjoy California.
-Blackstone’s Commentaries 145–146, n. 42 (1803) in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting a citizen to repel force by force
when the intervention of society... may be too late to prevent an injury.
Exactly. There's a lot of high stakew poker houses here in the Myrtle Beach area. Most of them are homes in affluent neighborhoods where nobody actually lives in the house and it serves one purpose only.
-- I don't always post from my mobile but when I do, I prefer Tapatalk.
"For we pay a price for everything we get or take in this world, and, although ambitions are well worth having, they are not to be cheaply won." -- L.M. Montgomery
GO STEELERS!
Laws like this one have been on and off the books of many states "forever."
When I was a kid my mom and her numerous cousins would have bi-monthly family
gatherings. The husbands of course had to come along and do something to keep busy.
They played poker quietly in a bedroom while the ladies did whatever .... girls stayed with the ladies
and we boys played on the floor near the men. It was nickle and dime poker, always friendly, no argument
or fight or ever a harsh word in about a 15 year period of time that I knew these games took place.
And it was all 100% illegal with pots that never ran more than a buck or two in total.
"Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war."
John Adams. Second President of the United States.
It's to prevent "gambling houses", which we used to have a lot of around here. Houses .... that were purely used for gambling, and included any type of gambling. They still exist, just much more underground and restricted now.
As soon as the "house" is taking a "cut" , then the issue arises as to whether it is or isn't a gamblin house, and technically it is.
I think it's a good idea personally. The old gambling houses that were going here, frequently ended up with dead bodies being found in some field the next day..... due to accusations of cheating, a gambling debt, bad words spoken to someone else, etc.
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --- Will Rogers ---
Chief Justice John Roberts : "I don't see how you can read Heller and not take away from it the notion that the Second Amendment...was extremely important to the framers in their view of what liberty meant."