sheepdog.jpg Thank you for the thread. Gave me another place to share this little jewel.
This is a discussion on So, Think YOU Have an Opinion? within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Let's talk Turkey or Tin Foil Hats. I felt a need to preach to the choir to take a closer look at a decades old ...
Let's talk Turkey or Tin Foil Hats.
I felt a need to preach to the choir to take a closer look at a decades old plan of the elites. Legislation is being passed and proposed based on “feelings and emotions” rather than common sense and debate. Why?
Does anyone see a conspiracy unfolding before their very own eyes with all the state laws being passed and proposed restricting or eliminating our rights, not privileges? Let's start with the creation of “The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)” comrade citizens, papers please. This agency was passed by Congress with little debate and as a knee jerk feel good emotional reaction to 9/11. Just look at their track record so far in their brief history. What government agency has ever been a success, viable, efficiently run, solvent and an asset he thinks to himself?
Let's switch to our national security for a moment. Just like they did in WWII, you target the most likely and potential demographic population hostile to the interests and potential threats to our nation, then make amends and compensation for any errors that may have occurred. That's the price you pay when we war against a country of your citizenship and not knowing your allegiance. This all inclusive and no profiling of a race, religion or ethnicity is total nonsense in this day and age to protect against another genocide of Americans and mass murder.
Strip searching our ninety-five year old generational Americans women in wheel chairs to board an American aircraft flight, foreign or domestic is absurd. Not profiling nationality, age, foreign birth of the most likely candidates of future terrorist attacks is useless, IMHO. Let's not hurt anyone's feelings in the name of being all inclusive and non-discriminatory.
Does our Federal Government really have our nations best interest at heart? What is the Federal Governments most important duty as outlined in the Constitution? Hint: National defense and protect our borders.
Especially since the terrorist attack on our nation, did the government ever lock down our borders for our own security? In the name of trade and not offending our Northern & Southern neighbors we keep the borders open to our own peril. Stupid, stupid, stupid and we were lucky this time.
In case you missed it on CNN, our border towns are in shambles, a sewer pit, trash and litter and filled with illegals, drug cartels and an open path to the invasion of foreign diseases, illegals adding to the depletion of tax dollars and the drug cartels running amok. You Americans living near the border chime in here and tell me I'm misinformed and a bigot.
Hispanics, Mexicans, Haitians and the world is flooding this nation at an alarming rate and bringing their culture to try and change America to the country they fled in terror! A brief example: China Town, Vietnam Town, all the associated racial gang-bangers our urban areas experience in the hundreds of thousands, etc.. There's no denying it, it's a plague of national proportions bankrupting southern and western states, much-less that stolen by taxes from you working to support illegals in the form of taxes. Does it bother you that it diminishes your ability to work and provide for your own family, and become that of the working poor?
United States citizenship and legal / illegal residency of foreign nationals are flying the flag of the country they left at sporting events, gatherings, political gatherings, etc. Is that appreciation and assimilation or slapping your face?
If you have a clue about the World Trade Organization (WTO), GATT, NAFTA, the UN, World Bank (WB), International Monetary Fund (IMF), United Nations (UN) and other alphabet of trade treaties for the one world global society our government is striving for... You would know that is not for the best interest of a sovereign United States of America. As Ross Perot once said and I paraphrase, “did you hear that great sucking sound of jobs leaving the U.S.?”
What about passing “hate laws” that make the law unequal for “special” segments of society? When was the last time someone committed a heinous crime that didn't have hate in his / her heart? Legislating what was once evil as now good, acceptable and should be celebrated and taught in public schools and Federal employees to celebrate. Been there and done that.
How about the very foundation of this once great nation. The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The God that gives us our God given rights, and not the state. What God gives, he doesn't take back. What the state gives is subject to the current will of the people and most likely liberals.
Ever notice the full frontal assault taking place to remove the Pledge of Allegiance from the classroom, no prayer in schools, no prayer before athletic events, no Christian Christmas displays unless all inclusive in public areas?
When I was in public high school many years ago, you had to study and pass the Constitution of the United States to graduate from high school. Not anymore, their subject matter is composed of teaching acceptance of alternative life styles, how to properly put on and wear a condom, gay sex, etc. What's wrong with that picture?
Which leads me to... If you were a liberal government educated with old white collar money and didn't have a real job in your life, filled with elitists and politicians that never served in the military, gives a percentage much less than the average Joe to charity, is greedy and self serving, hell bent on the destruction of a sovereign nation and individual freedoms, so that a philosophy could be imposed of a peaceful one world type of existence could be achieved. What would you call it?
This isn't the America my forefathers lost life and limb defending. This is not the America I proudly served defending this nation. This America has changed dramatically, for the worse.
God bless our troops, no one has more admiration and respect for our American service men than I do. But, shedding American blood on a foreign soil for a people that do not appreciate it and despise us for who we are, and will immediately revert back to a Sharia law first chance after we're gone, is a crime IMHO.
Think you have an opinion, let's hear it?
I think, therefore I am...
" But if you are authorized to carry a weapon, and you walk outside without it, just take a deep breath, and say this to yourself... Baa." Col. Dave Grossman on Sheep and Sheepdogs.
Given today's release of the Obama memo outlining the killing of US citizens without due process, what makes anyone think they won't deem people threats (i.e. enemy of the state) on domestic soil and have them snuffed? What makes anyone think they haven't already been doing that?
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
I used to think that these proposed gun bans were just misguided efforts to do "something" to stop the carnage... Liberal, mostly Democrat, efforts; thinking they were "common sense" ways to keep tragedies like Columbine, Aurora, and Sandy Hook from happening again...
Then I read Ms. Frankenstein's AWB v. 2013.
Hmmmmm... If it's about stopping the carnage, why would she exempt the weapon that fired the most rounds, and killed the most students at Columbine? A weapon that was SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED to comply with her previously stupid attempt at an AWB? An evil black ugly gun that killed before, in mass quantities? Why would she exempt it? A proven child killer?
Is it because it only has a 10 round factory mag? Is it because it didn't have a barrel shroud, or an attachable grenade launcher? No bayonet lug?
Why would she EXEMPT a proven weapon of mass child killing, but go after weapons that have the potential to give the American Citizen a fighting chance against a burgeoning tyrannical government?
If it was "for the children" why did she exempt the Hi Point Carbine?
Pure and simple... It has NOTHING TO DO WITH STOPPING TRAGEDIES. IT'S ABOUT DISARMING THE CITIZENRY of functional weapons that would offer a fighting chance against federal seizure of all guns.
IBTL for political reasons.
It could be worse!
When the Federal Marshalls come to Cedar County they will be met with with polite and generous and freshly deputized folks. The Marshalls will walk away wondering what just happened.
Last edited by Doghandler; February 6th, 2013 at 01:38 AM.
There is a solution but we are not Jedi... not yet.
We have deep thinkers and stinkers in this group that could come up with a solution...
I do so hope you're right, doghandler. Perhaps it might be the same in Benton County?
It could be worse!
I'd comment, but you all have already said it.
"...something evil this way comes..."
The Obamabots won't believe that until it directly impacts them...like if Beonce and Jay-Z don't get invited to the White house next week. Now that's something they'd sit up and take notice of.
We're in so much trouble.
Heaven goes by favor. If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in.- Mark Twain
My attention span is way too short for this.
Retired USAF E-8. Lighten up and enjoy life because:
Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... Buffalo Springfield - For What It's Worth
Nothing more need be said. Its a quandry
One problem with DHS transferring and purchasing all of the Military grade weaponary and ammo is that DHS bypasses the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act which restricts the use of the Military forces on US soil without the consent of Congress. DHS can be directed "At Will" by our current King O the 1st without the consent of the Lords and Nobles, sorry I meant the President and our elites Congress as I'm CORN-fused by History. As a DHS listed possible target, i.e., military vets, I feel threatened!
Pass the tin-foil Mabel, I hear another drone!
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress. -- John Adams
If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free! -- P.J. O'Rourke
Don't we all?!
It is all about the Liberal agenda!
The liberal agenda is to undermine our Constitution so that this Free Republic that we all love will eventually become a socialistic/communistic dictatorship. I dread to think of what our children and grand children will need to deal with if we can not stop it.
Don't take my word for this, it does not take a big effort to see what universities and now even high schools are teaching.
Conspiracy? No there is no conspiracy it is painfully obvious that the liberal Democrats, the mainstream media and many universities are working together in this undermining of the Constitution.
LEARN something today so you can TEACH something tomorrow.Dominus Vobiscum <))>(Where is the wisdom that we have lost in knowledge?" T.S. Elliot
I forget what other states were doing this as well I think it was about 9 of them. I am sure you could Google it.
Sent via telepathy on a Galaxy S3
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.