This is a discussion on Nest Thermostat within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Has anyone actually had and used it ?
Its time to set up electricity at the house when we move-in in 2 weeks. Its catching ...
Post By lionround
February 14th, 2013 03:25 PM
Has anyone actually had and used it ?
Its time to set up electricity at the house when we move-in in 2 weeks. Its catching my eye. I can sign up with the Nest at 11.9c kwh for 2 years. Or go with a normal plan at like 9.7c kwh.
My question if any of yall have used it, will I actually see savings with it ?
February 14th, 2013 03:25 PM
February 14th, 2013 03:36 PM
I haven't yet but I've looked at them and read about them a bit. I also contacted their support people to make sure my current system would work and they were very prompt and very helpful, providing both written instruction and pictures.
I like the concept and believe that it would save you money over the long haul, just how long is the only question. It's not excessively expensive and firmware/software updates are free I believe.
February 14th, 2013 10:04 PM
I don't understand why your electric rate would be dependent on what type of thermostat you have. It appears that the Nest rate is about 20% higher than the non Nest rate. So, before you save any money with it, you would have to use at least 20% less electricity.
I looked at it for my house, but had just replaced my thermostat before I saw this one. I think they are kewl, but am going to wait.
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
-- Steven Wright
1950 Colt .38 Police Positive Special
2013 SCCY 9mm CPX-2 Stainless Steel
US Army 1973-1977, 95B
February 14th, 2013 11:06 PM
I don't understand how you can save money by spending more money. No thank you.
The government is merely a servant -- merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a
patriot and who isn't. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.
February 14th, 2013 11:16 PM
I think the extra $0.02/kwh is supposed to pay for them giving him a Nest thermostat... i know a few people that use it, not sure about their savings though. i think the savings depends on whether or not you would set the thermostat down when you leave normally anyway. if you do, then savings will be reduced quite a bit.
i've looked at them but never found it good enough to switch...
February 14th, 2013 11:17 PM
I just looked at the Nest site and the Reliant site, and it looks like the thermostat is free except that you pay 2.2c per kwh extra and the deal goes for 2 years. According to something I found on the internet, the average american house uses 11,500 kwh per year. So we have (2.2c extra per kwh) * 11,500 kwh per year * 2 years = about $250. You can buy this thermostat for $250 from amazon.
Surprise, surprise. What it amounts to is that if you take their deal, and if you use about the average amount of electricity, you will pay them $250 by way of higher electric rates. Or, you could pay the lower rate and buy one on your own for $250. Or, of course, you could do neither and just get the lower rate.
February 15th, 2013 12:13 AM
According to this (How much electricity does an American home use? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)) average usage in Texas for a year would be 15,144 kWh, so that makes things worse.
Originally Posted by knowltk
That said, I have no doubt a Nest will save on energy, but will it come quickly enough to make it worth them subsidizing it by charging you a higher rate? My guess is no... they are in it to make money ;)
I have had my Nest since last June and I love it, but it is hard to figure out exactly what it has saved due to some of the differences in weather we have seen when comparing current year to the previous and the change in rate during that time as well.
February 15th, 2013 03:33 AM
Thanks, but no thanks. My 8 year old $30.00 set back thermastat works fine.
"The time is now near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be freemen or slaves."
------------------------------------— George Washington 1776
Gun free zones
are safe havens-
February 15th, 2013 07:30 AM
I installed a progamable thermostat years ago and based on our historical energy usage, we saved about 20%. I programmed it around our lifestyle and so that we did not keep the house at the same temperature when we were not home. In the winter I also lowered the house temperture while we were sleeping to 60. I think the main advantage of gthe nest is that it is easy to program as it "learns" what you want. I am not sure it is worth the extra money. The programmable thermostats that I put in cost $47 each.
February 15th, 2013 08:00 AM
I don't see how this could be a savings either. The company gives you a thermostat and then charges you more to use it? Is this something your electric company provides? If not, how does the Nest company collect the fee?
What kind of heat system do you use? Forced air or a heat pump?
If you have forced air, programable thermostats are the way to go. If you have a heat pump, pick a temperature that you feel comfortable with and leave it at that. If you raise the temperature more than 2 degrees at a time with a heat pump, it will kick into "emergency heat" and run on straight electric, which is very expensive, until it reaches the set temperature. That's why programable thermostats aren't cost saving for heat pumps outside of a 2 degree difference. If you're going away for awhile, of course you would set the temperature lower.
There are lots of ways you can save on electricity, but I'd be careful of the "Nest", it doesn't sound like any savings to me.
February 15th, 2013 08:45 AM
Jean, not neccessarily true for the more modern heat pumps. I Last year we installed a complete new system (and did that hurt the pocket book, LOL) and it is a multi-stage unit that slowly ramps up without using the emergency heat. It actually learns how long it takes to reach the new set temperature and then starts accordingly to reach desired temps based on your programming. It is a Trane with their whizz bang thermostat.
Originally Posted by Jeanlouise
To me if you really want to save $$, upgrade your system. Big hit on the front end, but long term benefits. Our unit was 10K, it saves us $150/month and it is far more comfortable. With the energy tax credit, it pays for itself in about 8 years.
I'd rather be lucky than good any day
There's nothing that will change someone's moral outlook quicker than cash in large sums.
Majority rule only works if you're also considering individual rights. Because you can't have five wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for supper.
February 15th, 2013 09:05 AM
That's a good feature! We just upgraded our system last year too, I wonder if we have that feature. We have Heil and really like them. We had a programable thermostat but one of the HVAC guys told me not to program it more than 2 degrees. I'll have to test it out. I agree with the system upgrade. HP's are nothing like they were a few years ago!
Originally Posted by kapnketel
Search tags for this page
are customers of reliant energy, getting the nest thermastat
how long does it take to get nest from reliant
how long does it take to get the nest thermostat from reliant energy
is it worth the extra price per kw for nest thermostat
nest thermostat is it worth it 2013
nest thermostat long term review2
reliant free nest kwh
what is the catch on reliant nest
Click on a term to search for related topics.