Mark Levin Explains Why We Live in a Post Constitutional Society
This is a discussion on Mark Levin Explains Why We Live in a Post Constitutional Society within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; In case anyone missed it, Mark Levin was on Glenn Becks show this morning. I found this to be very interesting and thought it worthy ...
Post By Patti
September 19th, 2013†08:28 PM
Mark Levin Explains Why We Live in a Post Constitutional Society
In case anyone missed it, Mark Levin was on Glenn Becks show this morning. I found this to be very interesting and thought it worthy of sharing:
On radio this morning, Glenn spoke to fellow conservative author and radio personality Mark Levin about his latest book, The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Public. Much like Glenn, Mark has been making the case that the principles and values that founded this nation have unraveled. In his new book, Mark provides a thorough look at the beliefs of the Founding Fathers and the language of the Constitution itself to put forth a plan to restore the American Republic.
Todayís radio interview marked the first time Glenn and Mark had ever spoken, and they quickly found that they agree on a lot of things Ė mainly, there is an ever-growing need to restore America.
ďTell me about the amendments because first of all, I donít think people understand what has been taken out of our Constitution and how much we have been changed in the last hundred years,Ē Glenn said. ďPeople donít even understand the czars are not Constitutional and everything that has happened. Youíre calling for a Constitutional Convention.Ē
ďWe live in what I call a Ďpost-Constitutionalí period. And youíre well familiar with Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive movement. We have to accept the fact that they won. They did win and this utopian statism and Constitutional Republicanism cannot coexist. And they donít coexist,Ē Mark explained. And the circle of liberty around every individual is shrinking and shrinking and shrinkingÖ So if you believe in the Constitution, then you have to believe itís time to reestablish it.Ē
ďAnd the Framers gave us one way to reestablish the Constitution, should the federal government become oppressive. And thatís George Masonís own words from the Constitutional Convention,Ē he continued. ďAnd two days before the end of at that Convention, in Philadelphia, he stood up and he said: ĎLook, what if Congress becomes oppressive? What if this new government becomes oppressive? Short of violence, what can the people do? Congress is not going to propose amendments to the states to fix themselves.í And so, he insisted that the states have the power to get together and propose amendments to all the states Ė still requiring three-fourths ratification. And so, we can talk about the culture, and you do and I do, and we can talk about aspects like that. But when weíre talking about the Constitution, people say, ĎI thought Levin he revered the Constitution, now you want to change it.í No, I want to bring it back. And the book has some of my ideas.Ē
With that idea in mind, Glenn and Mark went on to discuss the practicality and ramifications of undertaking such a movement.
ďPat and Iíve been talking about the Constitutional Convention. We talked about it for years, and Pat said, ĎNo, no, no,íĒ Glenn concluded. ďI think thereís something to this case. And I think Mark just made that case.Ē
GLENN: In this last week, we have seen in Texas, and in South Carolina, the Constitution being taught in textbooks in ways that you donít even recognize the Constitution anymore. Being taught in, in ways that make the Second Amendment really only four militias and if youíre trying to stop the quartering the soldiers in your home, only at peace time itís really amazing whatís going on and it is prompted me this week, to say to you that I donít, I donít think you are losing your country. I think youíve lost your country. I think weíve lost at least one generation, perhaps two. And if we donít start immediately restoring the information and putting things back weíre not going to make it.
Mark Levin is a talk show host who has the number one non fiction book now for three straight weeks. And it is called The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic. Mark how are you sir?
MARK LEVIN: Iím good nice to meet you. How are you?
GLENN: Nice to meet you I was trying to, I asked this morning if we had ever met or even spoke to each other I donít think we ever have?
MARK LEVIN: We have never.
GLENN: Well, Iím glad to have you on the program.
MARK LEVIN: And I want your audience to know you sent me a very kind letter. And youíre a patriot and youíre fighting like hell and this is very, very important.
GLENN: Tell me about the amendments because you have at first of all, I donít think people understand what has been taken out of our constitution and how much we have been changed in the last, in the last hundred years people donít even understand the czars are not constitutional and everything that is, has happened. Youíre calling for a constitutional convention.
MARK LEVIN: We live what I call a post-constitutional period. And youíre well familiar with Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive movement. We have to accept the fact that they won. They did win and this utopian statism and constitutional Republicanism cannot coexist. And they donít coexist. And the circle of liberty around every individual is shrinking and shrinking and shrinking. People think Iím prone. I can go to movies, I can go bowling I can get my IPhone. Thatís not what weíre talking about. Youíre not free to pick your toilet. Youíre not free to pick your light bulb, yet youíre free to pick your rulers. This doesnít make any sense. And we have this pubic by at this time all powerful central government the federal government that exists today is not in the Constitution. So I start with that premise. And I start with the premise that the Supreme Court is constantly rewriting Constitution as is the President and Congress and this massive fourth branch the Government. This administrative state thatís not even in the Constitution. So if you believe in the Constitution, then you have to believe itís time to reestablish it.
And so, the framers gave us one way to reestablish the Constitution. Should the federal government become oppressive and thatís George Masonís own words that the Constitutional convention. And two days before the end of at that convention, in Philadelphia, he stood up and he said, look, what if Congress becomes oppressive. What if this new government becomes oppressive. Short of violence, what can the people do? Congress is not going to propose amendments to the states to fix itself. And so, he insisted that the States have the power to get together and propose amendments to all the states. Still requiring three-fourths ratification. And so, we can talk about the culture and you do and I do and we can talk about aspects like that. But when weíre talking about the Constitution, people say, I thought Levin he revered the Constitution, now you want to change it. No, I want to bring it back. And the book has some of my ideas.
GLENN: Hang on just a second. Are you talking about a constitutional convention because, I have heard people talk about a constitutional convention before.
MARK LEVIN: No.
GLENN: And that is a frightening prospect. Youíre talking about something entirely different.
MARK LEVIN: First of all, the Constitution doesnít talk about a constitutional convention. The article five talks about a convention of the states to propose amendments. There canít be a constitutional convention. The language that the framers in Philadelphia wrote, was two methods for amending the Constitution one led by Congress, the other led by the states. Either we believe in federalism or we donít. They did. Itís the states legislatures in particular. Not the governor, not the Court, the states legislatures.
GLENN: Do we need, how many dates do we need and do they all have to show up can one state start it and say, this is what we, this is what we propose we do. And then they try to sell it to other states.
MARK LEVIN: Thatís the way it would work. I mean, theyíre not going to say, hey, guys letís have a convention and amend the Constitution. No, states are going to start, what used to happen is states would have meetings. Thatís what they meant by convention. And they would talk and they try and work out their differences and they come up with agreements. And then they would sends them back to the states for approval. The Constitutional convention, itself, in 1787, people wrongly state, you know they were there to amend the articles of confederation. Well I looked at the, at the commissions and thatís what they recalled. That were given the delegates to the Constitutional convention and they were not there ten out of the 12 states to amend the Articles of Confederation. They were there to draft a constitution.
And so, people attack our constitution as some kind of bastardized process. There wasnít a bastardized process. And as you know Rhode Island didnít even send delegates to the convention. So, what weíre talking about here, the language is limiting within article five. But weíre talking about here I a convention of the states for proposing amendments and still requiring three-fourths of the states to ratify. What the Ė
GLENN: Whatís the most, where would you say you start?
MARK LEVIN: In terms of the amendment.
GLENN: That you could win? And that are you saying that you do all of them? Or are you saying we start with one and get that passed and then do another? How does this work, Mark?
MARK LEVIN: The way it works is, that the state Legislature would decide how many one, 10, three, subjects will be raised at this convention. The state legislatures picked the delegates, as many as they want. Each state gets a vote. We know this from past practice. One vote. Each state. At the, at this convention. And they can bring up multiple subjects. They can bring up one subject. The State legislatures can withdraw their delegates this their delegates are out of control and the states in the end, three-fourths of them have to decide if what comes out of this convention is acceptable or not.
GLENN: I see, I mean, the things that you spell out in the book, I happen to agree with. Term limits on Congress. Term limits the Supreme Court. The super majority can override the Supreme Court rulings. Make the U.S. senate a voice for the States again. Amen. However, you and I both know, the game that we have all been duped to some level or another, the people we thought were on our side, are not really on our side. The GOP is a nightmare. And perhaps a bigger nightmare than the Democrats, because they are, their people are awake, their people that support them are saying, no, we are electing you to do these things. And then they go in and say theyíre going to do them but for instance, you know, the universal health care they voted 41 times against this they say. Theyíre not going to defund it.
MARK LEVIN: No theyíre not. And thatís why this is the recourse. Because it by passes Congress. It by passes the GOP establishment. It bypasses the Supreme Court, the President, the bureaucracy. This is completely bottom up. The people working with state delegates and state senators, itís states legislatures.
Letís me tell you this, Glenn. In this system doesnít work,weíre done. That means itís over. Because the top down system, the Progressives placed in the Constitution, with a centralized authoritarian ubiquitous government. We canít get anywhere with that. We can argue, we can win an election here and there, we may get arrested for four years or eight years.
GLENN: No, if you think Mitt Romney, I was not for Mitt Romney. He was my last choice. And Iíll never go down the GOP road again Iíll never do it again Iím not going to listen to that argument ever, ever, ever again. And if you think that Mitt Romney would not have been going into Syria and making a similar case, I mean he was making it during the election.
GLENN: So what do we do about it?
MARK LEVIN: Well, you a, donít go down the party road and you donít listen to the GOP anymore. And I think one of the things we do, is we look at the framers. And the framers said, this sort of thing likely to happen. George Mason said itís going to happen. And he said there has to be a way out. And the way out that they provide us with, thatís for some reason people fear the State legislatures. Look, I know thereís dark blue states out there. Thereís all over the place. I donít believe in static economics and I donít believe in static politics. Things get worse and they are going to get bad. Because you can see what their fighting over. Theyíre fighting over crumbs in Washington this government almost wrote the way it operates now, it keeps moving in one direction. At some point in some way they have spent a hundred years or more driving us over the cliff. We need to spend, 20, 25 years, some period of time, trying the process with the framers gave us. Use th Constitution to save the Constitution.
PAT: Mark, once of the arguments against the convention route has always been once you open it up you open it up to everything and they can change things like, maybe they make that, maybe they try to make the Second Amendment about militias only and not the rights of the individual. So, how do you, how do you address that concern, do you just believe that you wouldnít get 37 states to, to adopt that amendment?
MARK LEVIN: In advance, the states have to decide what the subject matter is, where theyíre going to go with it. I donít believe thereís going to be two-thirds of the State that say, states legislatures that say letís abolish the second amount amendment. But if they do, itís over. In other words, where do we go? If thatís the position of the federal government, and the position of a super majority of the State governments, itís over, isnít it?
PAT: Yeah, it would be.
MARK LEVIN: Bottom line is, if the people want to surrender to tyranny. Itís over either way. If you want to surrender to tyranny, then itís tyranny they get.
GLENN: Youíre making a very good case here, Mark. Iím really at that points to where look if this is what you want, Iím never going to make a part of it. Iím not going do go, I wonít play your game. I would go on my dying breath fight for freedom as I understand it and fighting for the Constitution of the United States of America. And I will instill it in my children. But if thatís what you want to do, just letís be open and honest about it. Thatís what you want, thatís what youíre voting for, good. Go for it. Take it.
MARK LEVIN: But the thing is, the reason the left has never gone through this approach, never, and the reason they would fight this approach, is they are getting damn near everything they want tomorrow down. Theyíve not going to wants to work bottom up. And letís keep something in mind. There are tens of millions of us who still love this country. Who still love the Constitution. Who still revere our heritage. And weíre looking for ways to deal with this. And we can keep beating our heads against the wall, elect more Republicans. Well, we had six years of Bush in the House and senate and other than Obama, it was the profligate out of control periods in federal recent federal history. So we can do that. But.
GLENN: Look at all the people in the house. They have the chance to stop the universal health care. They have the chance to stop it right now. And theyíre not doing it. And those are Republicans.
MARK LEVIN: Iím with you, thatís why I wrote this book. Iím with you.
MARK LEVIN: What Iím saying is, look, hereís the thing. People arenít perfect, our institutions arenít perfect. Thereís no absolute 100% foolproof system or proposal that can be made. Countries are not guaranteed perpetual existence. They are just not. When people say what can we do, what can we do. I rack my brain and I do what I usually do. I go back and look at our founding and I look at our history and even before then. And the framers, even though they set up this magnificent constitution, they were concerned that if would be breached. If you donít have people of virtue in these positions then you have what, over tyranny. So, this, this is the approach that they left us. I just thought it was time to remind people about it. To make the case for it. I mean ó I hear all the mights. I hear, you know, the convention can be hijacked. Hhjacked by whom. Theyíre not going to get three-fourths of the states to abolish the Second Amendment. And as I said, if we do itís over we have to look somewhere else I guess, but thatís not going to happen. Because the Legislatures decide who the delegates are. They can pull them back. And youíll always can have 13 states stop anything. Stop anything. If we canít find 13 states to stop something, do you know right now,13 states canít stop the Supreme Court. They canít stop Congress. They canít stop an imperial president. In other words, itís not like we have this magnificent constitution thatís being complied with. We donít. Itís not being complied with. So, whatís the alternative? If somebody else has another plan, I would love to see it.
GLENN: Mark, I have to tell you, thereís, I think people expect that everybodyís going to come up with the answer and, and you know, people I get people yelling at me all the time. Why are you doing this, why are you doing that. Well, because I play my role in the ó I donít have all the answers. I have no idea. Iím not a constitutional scholar. Iím not a attorney. I know my role. And my role is to try to effect the culture. Thatís where I am headed and that I think is an important piece. But we all have to understand that we each play a different role. Each of us. And you know, just like the founders, I mean, I am always, Iím always amazed at how Thomas Payne and George Washington, got together and if it wasnít for those two men, each of them, coming with their own special talents, the American experiment wouldíve never happened. Never happened.
And yet, they died hating each other. And oneís an atheist and one reveres God. They couldnít be two more different. Men that there were there. And you look at Sam Adams and, I mean all of them. Each of us play a role and I have to thank you for playing your role. Really, really good case. Really good case. And maybe youíre onto the answer. Somebody needs to figure out how to fix Washington. And I certainly donít know how the hell to do it because itís a mess. Good job.
MARK LEVIN: Well thanks, Glenn. I donít know that I have the answer. Iím just trying to remind people what the framers argued for and itís certainly worth taking a look I think God bless you and your staff there.
GLENN: Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Mark Levin, the Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic. I am so busy reading other books right now, on other topics, but I donít know if that wasnít a case to read this book, I donít know what is. Pat and Iíve been talking about the Constitutional convention. We talked about it for years and Pat said, no, no, no. I think thereís something to this case. And I think, I think Mark just made that case. Itís the Liberty Amendments. Restoring the American Republic available everywhere books are sold.
"I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."
September 19th, 2013†08:38 PM
The reality is this: Virtually everyone in this country is not motivated to undertake this effort. There will be no groundswell support for anything resembling a Constitutional Convention until people have no food and no shelter. We're a long way from that. The American people never do anything until absolutely forced to do so. That time is still a long way in the future. Talk of a CC or similar is interesting but just not realistic anytime in the near future. We have to completely, utterly destroy our nation before we'll see the average guy on the street ready to fight to fix it. Until then, it's not going to happen.
September 19th, 2013†09:05 PM
Unfortunately, You may be correct.
"I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."