Poll: Would you consent to a search during a routine traffic stop? - Page 2

Poll: Would you consent to a search during a routine traffic stop?

This is a discussion on Poll: Would you consent to a search during a routine traffic stop? within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Well, it would be hard for an officer to search my motorcycle, but even if it was a cage, the answer stays no....

View Poll Results: Would you consent to a search of your vehicle during a routine traffic stop?

Voters
204. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    43 21.08%
  • No

    161 78.92%
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 121

Thread: Poll: Would you consent to a search during a routine traffic stop?

  1. #16
    VIP Member Array SammyIamToday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,087
    Well, it would be hard for an officer to search my motorcycle, but even if it was a cage, the answer stays no.
    ...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller


  2. #17
    Senior Member Array dunndw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    1,123
    no. I carry 5 toolboxes in my Rodeo, and usually at least two computers. You want to fish...find another pier. I've got too much stuff back there that could be damaged, lost...or "lost" depending on the situation

  3. #18
    Senior Member Array BruceGibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest Florida
    Posts
    938
    Real world story on this topic. A couple years ago we had a guy driving his daughter's car. He was speeding and got pulled. FHP trooper wrote him a citation for it. She then asked him if she could take a look in the trunk. He consented...no big deal.

    Unbeknownst to him (as far as we know), the trunk is where his daughter kept her stash, and her notebook listing all of her customers. Turned out his little girl was quite the entrepreneur/freelance pharmacist.

    He got charged with possession with intent, paraphernalia, and two or three others. He was also within a thousand feet of a school when he was stopped which is an enhancement here.

    The search was consensual. We did manage to get the charges dismissed, but it took almost a year, and his attorney fee was (if memory serves) $15,000 plus costs. I don't remember what his bond was, but it was substantial. I also don't recall if we got the vehicle back, but it was seized and went through forfeiture (it was a real nice Lexus).

  4. #19
    Member Array grapeknutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    20
    Gots no problem with it!

  5. #20
    VIP Member
    Array CopperKnight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Spokane area, WA
    Posts
    6,742
    I voted "no", like most, for the principle of it. I'm not rude or disrespectful and I have nothing to hide, but still "no".
    eschew obfuscation

    The only thing that stops bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. SgtD

  6. #21
    Distinguished Member Array 4my sons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Out side of Richmond, VA
    Posts
    1,637
    I'd have to ask "why" no good answer, then no, If it's a traffic stop, for speeding , expired tags etc, not a chance, If it's a road check and they are looking for a missing child or etc, they can open the trunk, and look in or under anything that might hide a child, other than that, nothing to hide, no reason to look, search the next car.
    "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [Warren v. District of Columbia,(D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)]
    If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand

  7. #22
    Member Array ms.k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    somewhere
    Posts
    78
    As long as the cop wasn't acting suspect himself, I wouldn't care. I'd say yes.

  8. #23
    Ex Member Array Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,570
    Depending on the situation, I feel most LEOs wouldn't ask me anyway. But if asked I would grant permission.
    All they will find is one roll of shop towels, two cans of insect repellent, a first aid box and some pens. I keep a tidy truck.

  9. #24
    VIP Member Array packinnova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    4,340
    Absolutely NO WAY NO HOW in any circumstances. I understand they may have a legitimate reason and they have a job to do which doesn't get easier by me mucking it up. Hell, I'm even friends with some LEO's, but when push comes to shove...An LEO is NOT your friend once they ask to search. They are not asking to be your friend. They are not asking to help you. They ARE trying to find ANYTHING on you, whether or not it can stick...As far as they're concernced that's for the court to decide.
    "My God David, We're a Civilized society."

    "Sure, As long as the machines are workin' and you can call 911. But you take those things away, you throw people in the dark, and you scare the crap out of them; no more rules...You'll see how primitive they can get."
    -The Mist (2007)

  10. #25
    Member Array plblark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    284
    Nope.

    Officer, I understand you'd like to look around but barring any articulate reason, for which you could get a warrant, I'll respectfully decline on principle.
    For MN specific carry information and a great shooting community, check out forum.twincitiescarry.com

  11. #26
    Member Array K-Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    310
    I voted no. Have nothing to hide, but there's no need to search a vehicle if you're being stopped for speeding, and there's no other PC for a search.

  12. #27
    Senior Member Array MilitaryPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    976
    I think I'd have to say no for MOST situations. Like said before, it is the principle of the matter. The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution protects us from "unlawful search and seizure". In this situation, It would be unlawful for the officer to search my vehicle without my consent. Would I consent? Probably not. What is the probable cause? It had better be good. Now a Terry search is another thing.

    Use your rights or loose them.
    Gun control can be blamed in part for allowing 9/11 to happen.
    "Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum" (Latin)- "If you want peace, prepare for war".

  13. #28
    Administrator
    Array SIXTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    20,177
    Let me step in a minute and say this is not a 4th amendment issue, other than you have the right to say no... you are being asked to give consent to a search. It is not unlawful in anyway.
    "Just blame Sixto"

  14. #29
    Distinguished Member Array Stetson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Augusta,Maine
    Posts
    1,609
    No way!!

  15. #30
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    45,313

    I Have Nothing To Hide...

    But without a valid reason, definitely not. They can call the 'dog' if he/she desires to make me wait, but if it entails more than 15 minutes, I'm going to write a letter.

    I do not participate in illegal activities, so nothing will be found...for me it is a matter of principle...however, I will be overly friendly, and courteous...with a firm "NO, but thanks for asking!"

    I have no record...I don't go to bars...I don't drink and drive...I don't do drugs...He!!, I'm just an old fart, a polite one, but old, never the less...just don't waste my time, or yours, on some silly search routine!

    Stay armed...stay safe...my $.02...

    ret
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Officer Killed -- Routine Stop
    By DaveH in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: November 11th, 2010, 01:01 PM
  2. It doesn't need to be a so-called Routine Traffic Stop
    By DaveH in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: June 25th, 2010, 03:44 AM
  3. Traffic Stop
    By Spade115 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: January 29th, 2010, 04:31 PM
  4. first traffic stop with a gun in the car
    By beaker in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 14th, 2010, 09:40 AM
  5. Declaring CCW on a Routine Traffic Stop?
    By Black Nov in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: August 16th, 2009, 02:59 PM

Search tags for this page

must you consent to body search during routine traffic stop

,

routine traffic stop unlawful search

Click on a term to search for related topics.