Goose attack = $75 lawsuit
This is a discussion on Goose attack = $75 lawsuit within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; http://www.wvrecord.com/news/207858-employee-sues-csx-over-run-in-with-goose
Employee sues CSX over run-in with goose
2/12/2008 1:26 PM
By Chris Dickerson -Cabell Bureau
HUNTINGTON - A CSX Transportation conductor is trying to ...
-
February 19th, 2008 02:24 PM
#1
Member
Array
Goose attack = $75 lawsuit
http://www.wvrecord.com/news/207858-employee-sues-csx-over-run-in-with-goose
Employee sues CSX over run-in with goose
2/12/2008 1:26 PM
By Chris Dickerson -Cabell Bureau
HUNTINGTON - A CSX Transportation conductor is trying to goose his employer in federal court after he was attacked by a goose in a railyard.
Aaron E. Richards filed a FELA lawsuit Feb. 4 in U.S. District Court in Huntington against CSX.
On April 23, 2005, Richards says he was working as a conductor at the Keyser Receiving Yard near Ravenswood and was performing a brake test on a CSX train.
"As plaintiff performed the required inspection, a goose which was previously known by defendant to have nested in its yard area, suddenly jumped out from under one of the railcars, striking plaintiff, and causing him to fall," the complaint states.
Richards claims his injuries were caused by the negligence of CSX.
He lists injuries as past and future pain, past and future medical treatment, loss of earnings and impairment of future earning capacity and loss of enjoyment of life.
Richards seeks damages in excess of $75,000 as well as costs and other relief. He seeks a jury trial.
Richards is represented by Huntington attorney W. Michael Frazier and William Kvas of the Minneapolis law firm of Hunegs, LeNeave & Kvas. The case has been assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers.
U.S. District Court case number: 3:08-0079
Ok...Questions:
So this guy is a wuss...that being said...
(I recognize that this is a VERY GENERAL question, but just go with it)
To what extent if any does an employer have a responsibility of protecting its employees from wild animal life?
IMHO, IANAL, the answer is none. Think about it, if you are a park ranger, you are prob. employed by the state/feds...are they supposed to protect you from the possibility of bear attacks? No. But even if so, how could they?
Wouldn't logic dictate that if the scope of your work involves being outdoors at all, then there is an inherent "risk" associated with a possible encounter with animal life?
I have to believe that there are protections in place to protect employers. Going by this logic, if one gets in a car accident on their way to work, then the employer should be at fault...
You legal folk...help!
Next question...in the event you are being attacked by a goose, what is the best way to defend yourself? I do not care if I kill it or not.
-
February 19th, 2008 02:24 PM
Remove Ads
-
February 19th, 2008 02:30 PM
#2
Member
Array
Gander
Well lets not get our gander up. IMO, this case will most likely get thrown out by the judge. Geese will run from you if you confront them. If you show them you are afraid, you lose.
-
February 19th, 2008 02:40 PM
#3
VIP Member
Array
I've heard of somebody getting goosed before,but 75,000 for a bruise or scrape that guy wouldn't want me sitting on the jury
-
February 19th, 2008 02:45 PM
#4
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
charmincarmens
Well lets not get our gander up. IMO, this case will most likely get thrown out by the judge. Geese will run from you if you confront them. If you show them you are afraid, you lose.

I agree except for geese running from you. The Canadian Geese that fly through the area I live in, WILL attack and will NOT run until injured. Mean buggers they is.
"Wise people learn when they can; fools learn when they must." - The Duke of Wellington
-
February 19th, 2008 02:56 PM
#5
VIP Member
Array
Grab it around the neck spin 5-6 times, add a good side dish and a glaze. on the grill at 350 for 1 hour.
GUN CONTROL= I WANT TO BE THE ONE IN CONTROL OF THE GUN
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.
-
February 19th, 2008 03:01 PM
#6
Senior Member
Array
Didums' fall down and go boom????
Did that nasssty gooses scare the poor little guy????
Man up, already. If he really injured himself on the job, worker's comp ought to handle it, goose or no goose. Other than that, he's not owed a dime. Throw the bum out!
Liberty is an inherently offensive lifestyle. Living in a free society guarantees that each one of us will see our most cherished principles and beliefs questioned and in some cases mocked. It's worth it.
-
February 19th, 2008 04:14 PM
#7
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
nkanofolives
Richards seeks damages in excess of $75,000 as well as costs and other relief. He seeks a jury trial.
He's just trying to feather his nest. JMO.
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliott
The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
Albert Einstein
-
February 19th, 2008 04:31 PM
#8
Ex Member
Array
Pitiful. With a sum that large and a possible jury trial---I'm almost sure there will be a settlement. I'm also sure someone's banking on just that. Sick though---really sick.
-
February 19th, 2008 04:37 PM
#9
Member
Array
my "tiger claw" will beat "goose bite"...sorry to many Bruce Lee movies.
-
February 19th, 2008 04:46 PM
#10
Distinguished Member
Array
Yea, but just think how many guns $75,000 would buy. Here goosey, goosey. This guy is probably a
Psalms 144:1
Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.
Senior Instructor for Tactical and Defensive of Texas
http://www.tac-def-tx.com/
CHL INSTRUCTOR
Retired LEO
NRA member
TCHA member
-
February 19th, 2008 04:58 PM
#11
Moderator
Array
Story update...
The CSX Goose has handed the case over to the AFLAC Duck using the 'old' pigeon drop pass off...
More later...
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
-
February 19th, 2008 05:02 PM
#12
VIP Member
Array
I think this story is for the birds. He should have ducked out of the way.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch; Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
-- Benjamin Franklin
-
February 19th, 2008 07:41 PM
#13
VIP Member
Array
One of my wishes is that I live long enough to see our Tort laws changed so that if a Plaintiff loses they automatically become liable for the Defendant's legal expenses.
Hoss
Sig 239 SAS 40 S&W / Sig 239 9mm / Kahr PM-9 / Walther PPS .40 / Sig P-245 / Ruger LCP
Beretta Tomcat / Walther PPK / BDA 380 / Taurus 85 / Kel-Tec PF-9 / Am. Derringer 357
NRA Life Member
My Web Site
-
February 19th, 2008 09:17 PM
#14
Moderator
Array

Originally Posted by
retsupt99
The CSX Goose has handed the case over to the AFLAC Duck using the 'old' pigeon drop pass off...




Originally Posted by
cvhoss
One of my wishes is that I live long enough to see our Tort laws changed so that if a Plaintiff loses they automatically become liable for the Defendant's legal expenses.

Yea! The current system justs cooks my goose.
NRA Life Member
"But if they don't exist, how can a man see them?"
"You may think I'm pompous, but actually I'm pedantic... let me explain the difference."
"Carry the battle to them. Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive and don't ever apologize for anything."
-
February 19th, 2008 09:24 PM
#15
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
cvhoss
One of my wishes is that I live long enough to see our Tort laws changed so that if a Plaintiff loses they automatically become liable for the Defendant's legal expenses.
Hoss
Agreed. There's nothing worse than taking unpaid time off of work to sit on a jury for some frivolous lawsuit. A frivolous appeal is even worse. Ask me how I know. I lost a month's pay because I thought I would be 'serving my country'. The lawyers still made their money though.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By jzattack in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Replies: 51
Last Post: August 30th, 2010, 06:31 PM
-
By ErnieNWillis in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Replies: 4
Last Post: June 17th, 2010, 10:26 AM
-
By Sheldon J in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Replies: 21
Last Post: April 23rd, 2009, 03:55 PM
-
By archer51 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Replies: 22
Last Post: November 25th, 2008, 12:19 AM
-
By paramedic70002 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 4
Last Post: September 29th, 2006, 04:52 PM
Search tags for this page
can you defend yourself against a canadian goose in indiana
, canadian goose attacks
, defend against a goose
, defending oneself goose attack
, defending yourself against a goose
, geese attack defending
, geese attack defense
, goose attack on bike how to defend against
, how to defend against a goose
, how to defend against geese
, how to defend yourself against a goose
, how to defend yourself from a goose
, powered by mybb aflac regional office
, powered by mybb attack
, powered by mybb kansas city regional office