September 29th, 2005 06:06 PM
1952 - 2006
To Prevent A Life Of Crime, Buy Your Kid A Gun
Commentary From Vin Suprynowicz
It's called propaganda: Simplify your lie down to an easily recalled slogan, repeat it often enough, and people will eventually get it down by heart and accept it as fact.
Take: "The cause of all these school shootings is the easy availability of guns."
Prior to the National Firearms Act of 1933, there was no law to discourage a veteran of the Great War from keeping a fully- operational souvenir machine gun in the bedroom closet. There were few towns in America where the local lads didn't know the location of at least one such weapon. Yet none was ever used in a "school shooting."
As late as the 1960's it was not unusual in rural America for young boys to carry their .22 rifles to school with them, parking them in the principal's office until needed for the target matches after school. At 49, I am no doddering old-timer, but I can remember young lads walking the country roads of Ohio and Connecticut after school with their rifles (or bicycling home with the weapons across their handlebars), hoping to pick off some predatory bird with the full encouragement of the area farmers. A neighbor might chide you about watching where your bullets went if you missed, but no one ever called the police to report "the Jones boy is heading down the road with his gun; come arrest him!"
When I went away to Eaglebrook School in Massachusetts in 1962 at the age of 12, I took my rifle. We fired for accuracy at the range on Saturdays. I daresay we could have snuck them out of the lockers down at the gym for some mayhem if it ever crossed our minds ... but it never did.
The violent media? Today's TV offers nothing like "The Rifleman" or "Wanted Dead or Alive," programs of the early 1960's in which Chuck Conners and Steve McQueen ended every episode by mowing down some reprobate who had kicked the town dog or insulted Millie down at the general store, in McQueen's case using a sawed-off Winchester which it's now a federal felony even to recreate for a museum.
This focus on "the availability of guns" -- ignoring the fact they were far more accessible only 40 years ago, when you could order a 20-m/m Lahti anti-tank gun through the mail from an ad in the back of a comic book -- is intended not only to advance the prior agenda of those who want a disarmed and enslaved citizenry, but also to distract us from asking what it is about the mandatory behavior modification labs (public schools) which creates such rage and frustration in our incarcerated adolescent males.
It also diverts attention from the perfectly relevant question of how many of these shooters had been on drugs known to affect the judgment, like Ritalin and Luvox, prescribed and administered by their government wardens.
In the face of all this misdirection, isn't it too bad the government has never conducted an actual scientific study on how it affects a child's likelihood of committing crimes if his parents buy him a gun?
Um, actually ... it has.
The study was conducted from 1993-1995 by the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Child psychologists tracked 4,000 boys and girls aged 6 to 15 in Denver, Pittsburgh and Rochester, NY. Their findings?
Children who get guns from their parents don't commit gun crimes (0 percent) while children who get guns illegally are quite likely to do so (21 percent).
Children who get guns from parents are less likely to commit any kind of street crime (14 percent) than children who have no gun in the house (24 percent) -- and are dramatically less likely to do so than children who acquire an illegal gun (74 percent).
Most strikingly, the study reports: "Boys who own legal firearms have much lower rates of delinquency and drug use (than boys who own illegal guns) and are even slightly less delinquent than non-owners of guns."
This wouldn't have surprised anyone before the rise of the modern welfare state. It used to be common knowledge that the best way to get kids to act "responsibly" was precisely to give them some "responsibility." Why would we assume a child taught by his parents to use a gun responsibly wouldn't also be more responsible in his other behaviors?
Want to dramatically reduce the chance that your child will commit a gun-related crime or -- heaven forbid -- go on a shooting spree?" asked the national Libertarian Party in a May 21 news release detailing these study results. "Buy your youngster a gun."
"Politicians are apparently more interested in demonizing guns than they are in facts," commented LP national director Steve Dasbach, himself an Indiana government schoolteacher. But, "The evidence is in: The simplest way to reduce firearm-related violence among children is o buy them a gun and teach them how to use it responsibly."
Vin Suprynowicz, assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, is author of the book "Send in the Waco Killers." E-mail email@example.com
Heroes are people who do what has to be done, when it has to be done, regardless of the consequences
"I like when the enemy shoots at me; then I know where the ******** are and can kill them."
DE OPPRESSO LIBER
September 29th, 2005 06:25 PM
September 29th, 2005 06:43 PM
+1 Kids need to be given responsibility to keep them on the straight and narrow
September 29th, 2005 07:18 PM
Excellent Bob - preaching to the choir here quite naturally.
Just wish real common sense would prevail ''out there'' instead of distorted conjecture and emotional hype. A look at history is often useful - they say there is much to be learned from it. But only if folks pay heed and let themselves learn.
The anti's really have only one mantra - ''guns are bad'' - no qualification just that - ''guns are bad''. So therefore remove all guns and all is well - QED!
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.
"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."
- a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.
September 30th, 2005 02:54 PM
I think that if I hadn't have been given responsibility, both with guns and money, I could have very well turned out different.
I won't lie but I am predisposed to violence. Not because of my home or my childhood (I grew up middle class and with more than enough food in my belly) but because it's a family gene on my dad's side.
I am willing to say that having guns as a child actually saved my life as well as the quality of life.
September 30th, 2005 03:38 PM
I bought my first gun, a Remington .22 rifle, when I was 17 at a hardware store. Boy have things changed.
September 30th, 2005 04:24 PM
That was a good thought provoking article. Really makes you wonder were we went wrong. Sometimes it seems like after about 225 years of this country we've really gone downhill in the last 25 or so.
EOD - Initial success or total failure
By riseforms in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: December 2nd, 2008, 02:36 PM
By foreveryoung001 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Last Post: March 23rd, 2008, 06:55 PM
By CT-Mike in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: March 10th, 2008, 08:58 PM
By paramedic70002 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: November 16th, 2006, 09:09 AM
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors