This is a discussion on Forum Members & Those W/ Kids - Get Educated On Vaccines within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Originally Posted by QKShooter Interesting Question: Why would hospitals routinely vaccinate newborn infants against Hepatitis B using a vaccine that contains a Mercury compound as ...
I'll watch the VID later as I am on work NetZero dial-up which is slower than an elderly snail super-glued to the back of a turtle stuck in quicksand.
After saying all this I will admit I am not very knowledgeable about all the vaccines because I am not in the position right now to have to decide if a loved one or myself should take one. My company was kind enough to distribute Tamiflu to all its employees and families in case they came down with the disease and since it has shown positive results that is going to be my game plan.
In Winter on a glacier with a strong headwind.
Meanwhile back to the H1N1 - Why are they developing this vaccine NOW?
They never start making any yearly flu vaccine this early because they never know exactly what strain of flu is going to eventually hit the U.S.
It's all always only a yearly educated best guess as to what Flu strain will hit anyway.
And at this point in time they do not yet know how H1N1 will ultimately mutate.
Many years AKA normal Flu Season ~ They get it wrong and people get vaccinated for the wrong strain of Flu which is exactly the same has having not been vaccinated at all.
So what's the rush to whip up all this vaccine right now for a Pandemic that is NOT a Pandemic and a Flu that has only killed 3,000 so far worldwide - which is at least 120,000++ LESS than the # of people that normally die each year from a yearly Flu or direct complications of a typical Flu?
I'm not wearing a Tin-foil hat BUT, there ARE serious questions that need serious answers because ....this entire Swine Flu thing just smells mighty funny.
When I get a gut feeling that something ain't right. Usually something ain't right.
OK Fact Time.
The vast majority of folks to date that have actually contracted documented/tested H1N1 Flu have only suffered mild "flu-like symptoms" and have "got over it" fairly easily and minus any vaccine and minus any permanent ill effects to their health.
So either they KNOW that H1N1 is going to mutate into something extraordinarily deadly and we're not being told about it....and we're not being given that information - or the intention is to "create" a pandemic health crisis in keeping with the already publicly stated (by this administration) "Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste." - as that philosophy directly relates to moving forward a specific agenda under the guise of a catastrophic emergency that can only be solved by government.
Regarding the 1976 incidents: "The unfortunate outcome was that the 1976 vaccine led to a 1 per 100,000 incidence of Guillaine-Barre Syndrome, which is something no other flu vaccine before or since has done."
If 30,000 people die from a flu epidemic each year that means you have a 1 in 10,000 chance of dying from the flu, or a 10 fold higher chance of dying from flu than of getting Guillaine Barre. Guillane Barre is not nice, but it is treatable and many if not most will recover. I don't know the mortality rate for Guillaine Barre. I do know that you have about a 1 in 10,000 chance of getting it from any of several common infectious diseases and there is always an underlying rate of the illness without regard to flu vaccines or to influenza; e.g., 1 in 10,000 who contract Campylobacteriosis will develop Guillaine Barre or something similar called Miller-Fisher Syndrome. About 2 million per year in the US contract Campylobacteriolosis.
Now, I have to agree that each year's vaccine and epidemic is different and it is not possible to guarantee that the odds are similarly favorable for the vaccine taker as they were in 1976. But, you can get Guillane Barre from the flu too. So you need to factor that in as well.
We had a lady in our office who developed Guillaine Barre a few years back from contracting a flu like illness. She had a bad time for awhile, but did recover. It is not a highly fatal disorder. Everything in life is balancing risk and benefits. The balance should be based on fact, on real data, and not on fear.
Look no further than the HPV vac. Garadisil the "health experts" rammed that one down our throats. I believe more than 30 young girls have died from it so far and the pushers are still in denial. Sure I trust our government.
While people are saying "Peace and safety," destruction will come on them suddenly, ... and they will not escape. 1Th 5:3
As for your dad getting vaccinated and getting the flu: That happens two ways. 1) When you have been exposed to the flu close in time to when you got the vaccine; 2) there are "flu-like illnesses" which are mistaken for flu but aren't really the real deal influenza.
Actually, too, the vaccine is not 100% effective. But, what you have no way of knowing is to what extent the vaccine may have reduced the severity and duration of your dad's flu, if he actually had the real deal.
I think what bothers me about some anti-vaccine attitudes this time around is that the at risk group appears to be adolescents. They need an adult to make a decision to protect them. Moreover, even if there were truth to the link between autism and vaccines, that has nothing to do with adolescents. So, what is the excuse for not protecting your kids? Fear of Guillaine Barre is rational, but the relative risk of that v flu is heavily in the direction of the flu being the more dangerous of the two.
I'm not an expert in flu stuff, but my wife is. She recently had to attend a mandatory meeting at our local hospital regarding this. When I asked her "what's the plan" she said, "wash your hands"
BTW: Mercury was banned in vaccines a while back. The only kid shots left with mercury are the ones in supply (They didn't recall the old stuff with mercury in it).
Don't believe what you hear and only half of what you see!
Everything in life is balancing risk and benefits. The balance should be based on fact, on real data, and not on fear.
Risk and Benefit, Risk and Benfit, Risk and Benefit. Exactly the correct answer.
Oh! To be an Actuary...............so CPA's could tell jokes about you........
Hopyard, you have summarized many things exactly and concisely, and this is yet another.
"He went on two legs, wore clothes and was a human being, but nevertheless he was in reality a wolf of the Steppes. He had learned a good deal . . . and was a fairly clever fellow. What he had not learned, however, was this: to find contentment in himself and his own life. The cause of this apparently was that at the bottom of his heart he knew all the time (or thought he knew) that he was in reality not a man, but a wolf of the Steppes."
I don't understand what all the paranoia here is. If there's a vaccine available I'll get in line. If there isn't, I won't.
If there's a genuine national emergency, everyone and their uncle is going to be climbing over each other to get the vaccine. They're not going to send UN troops to your house to inject vaccines into your heart. At most, your school might make vaccination a precondition of attendance, just like they already do for a bunch of other vaccinations. If you don't like it, homeschool your kid. Lots of people do.
I just see people getting worked up about political fears of big government, not about any actual rational risk of forced vaccination programs.