New bill to get more ranges!

New bill to get more ranges!

This is a discussion on New bill to get more ranges! within the Off Topic & Humor Discussion forums, part of the The Back Porch category; New Bill Promoting and Creating Target Shooting Ranges S. 1702 Washington, DC --(AmmoLand.com)- The expansion of America’s urban and suburban areas has crowded out many ...

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: New bill to get more ranges!

  1. #1
    Member Array UnklFungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    441

    New bill to get more ranges!

    New Bill Promoting and Creating Target Shooting Ranges S. 1702

    Washington, DC --(AmmoLand.com)- The expansion of America’s urban and suburban areas has crowded out many shooting areas and made it increasingly difficult to find a place to shoot. On September 24, 2009, Senators Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and James Risch (R-Idaho) introduced S. 1702, a bill that would help remedy this problem by promoting the construction and maintenance of target ranges on public lands.

    The bill would amend the Pittman-Robertson Act, a 70-year-old federal law that uses federal excise taxes on firearms and ammunition to fund wildlife conservation programs and the construction of shooting ranges.

    The bill’s improvements to the Pittman-Robertson Act would allow the states far greater ability to purchase land, build new target ranges, and improve the ranges that currently exist. Currently, Pittman-Robertson only allows the federal government to use these funds to pay 75 percent of the cost of building or maintaining a range. S. 1702 would change the funding requirements under Pittman–Robertson to allow the federal government to finance up to 90 percent of target range construction and maintenance with Pittman Robertson funds.

    This change would allow states greater latitude in the allocation of Pittman-Robertson funds and provide an incentive for the use of these funds for the construction of target ranges.

    The bill would also provide new authority for states to use Pittman-Robertson funds to acquire lands to use for target range development. Under S. 1702, a state could use its share of Pittman-Robertson funds to finance up to 90 percent of the cost of land acquisition. This is a vital change, as it would allow the states for the first time to use Pittman-Robertson funds to buy land for target range construction. In addition to providing an incentive to the states to develop new ranges, this change would provide greater flexibility to the states in allocating these funds to the projects that are the highest priority for sportsmen.

    The bill would give the states up to five years to use Pittman-Robertson funds for range projects and land acquisition. This would allow the states to accumulate funds during a five-year period, to provide more latitude to build range projects or purchase land. Presently, states have only two years to “use or lose” the funds apportioned to them.

    Another important provision of S. 1702 is a provision that would protect the federal government from legal liability in relation to the construction and operation of shooting ranges. Despite the fact that such lawsuits have been very rare, the threat of legal action that might result from an accident at a range funded by federal money or located on federal land pprevents federal agencies from authorizing areas of public land fore recreational shooting. S. 1702 would provide immunity from civil lawsuits or money damages for any injury caused by activity at a public range located on federal land or constructed or maintained using Pittman-Robertson funds.

    About:
    Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America’s oldest civil rights and sportsmen’s group. Four million members strong, NRA continues its mission to uphold Second Amendment rights and to advocate enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation’s leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the military.
    “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”

    Patrick Henry
    Quote Originally Posted by UnklFungus
    If it is ok to disarm legal citizens to reduce crime, then doesn't it stand to disband the military to prevent war?


  2. #2
    Senior Member Array NYcarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Upstate
    Posts
    517
    Sweet, bring on the money!

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Pensacola, FL Ranges?
    By MSteve in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 8th, 2010, 06:00 AM
  2. NC rifle ranges?
    By TomEgun in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: September 7th, 2009, 08:03 PM
  3. Age ranges of permittee's
    By ppkheat in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: June 6th, 2009, 09:50 AM
  4. Houston gun ranges
    By jkvan87 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: March 12th, 2009, 04:51 PM
  5. CC and gun ranges
    By Huzar in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: August 1st, 2006, 02:55 PM