This is a discussion on going armed in terror of the public within the Open Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Quote "Per the news articles posted, he had a prior arrest and conviction in Ohio for pulling a stunt in which he displayed a gun ...
Quote "Per the news articles posted, he had a prior arrest and conviction in Ohio for pulling a stunt in which he displayed a gun inappropriately."
The article I read (in the link above) said he was arrested but later released and not charged.
You gota watch out for those ham radio enthusiasts though, most of them are sort a goofy.
"scope formulas found" I think the proper term is "dope". They might even be able to find some reloading data in my vehicle, so what?
The kid did nothing illegal, unless being a $hit magnet is illegal. He should have kept it concealed or left it in his vehicle - no one would have known he was a goofy ham radio operator with a gun.
Kudos to the law enforcement peeps who in the nick of time foiled another crime that clearly never was going to happen.
He is only guilty of using poor judgment.
I just wonder how often a misdemeanor carries $100,000 Bond?
seems a tad high... and I have never seen a Pontiac Grand Prix police car either...
But the point I made basically stands. He has been arrested now twice. Something isn't right. How many folks here have been arrested twice for unrelated events and been innocent, had the charges dropped, both times.
In some off topic threads OPFOR likes to play with probabilities. He presents some interesting games and math puzzles. Well the probability of being arrested twice and being completely innocent is quite low. I'll leave the calculations for a different thread.
In my 67 years I have never been arrested and received only one traffic ticket. This kid is doing stuff that is over the top.
It is also problematic to my mind as to why he wasn't charged in OH. It seems as if he should have been. The story describes an extremely inappropriate display of a firearm. Here it would be the crime of intentional display.
That action is why the police were called to the scene in Ohio. Maybe they just dropped the charge on a deal that he will leave the state?My old boss, described well. :)You gota watch out for those ham radio enthusiasts though, most of them are sort a goofy.
Next: Due process--never taken to court...innocent until proven guilty.
I do think he did exhibit poor judgment in his attempt to see the President with a firearm. Plus, I would like to know the details of the Ohio incident....for all we know, he could have been carrying concealed and had the wind open his jacket and someone called MWAG.....or...maybe not. We don't know be cause he wasn't brought to trial for us to know the facts.
As far as revoking his permit....for what exactly? What criminal law did he break? The airport issue will probably get him a trespass order. He didn't confront anyone with his firearm, nor (according to the police in the article) did he communicate a threat to the President...
I just hope none of us are ever caught up in the wrong place, wrong time sweepstakes...
Magazine <> clip - know the difference
martyr is a fancy name for crappy fighter
You have never lived until you have almost died. For those that have fought for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know
The day ANY of us here are too damned stupid to realize if WE were armed in an airport area, near the president, with a record of an incident in OH, acting like a wannabee with 4 antenna swayin' and telling the feds we want to see the president, then we would DESERVE to be in the wrong place, wrong time...
I dunno, I don't think I, nor hopefully anyone here, would be THAT friggin', ridiculously stupid....
Stop acting like we're fightin' for "freedom". We are ALREADY....free.
I agree with some here who point out that each individual component of this guy's acts might have an innocent explanation and be perfectly legal. OTOH, charges get sustained all the time on circumstantial evidence; the totality of the picture.
Here the whole picture looks bad. Especially when you know about the prior incident-- which fortunately for the kid, a jury will not be allowed to find out.
Without the prior, I think it is possible he won't be convicted, though there is still a circumstantial case that seem pretty strong. We have the luxury of knowing about the prior, and that info sure makes the guy look like uh, not quite right and up to no good. He might actually be innocent of anything but being stupid, but it will, as someone else stated, take a good jury and a discerning judge for him to walk from this one.
"Intentional display"? Is OC illegal where you live?
EDIT: Never mind, I just saw that you live in Texas...with the silly "no OC" law.
Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound.
-- L. Neil Smith
Hey Ya'll from NC. The truth is in NC if you open carry most folks don't care. If someone does complain, the LEO will identify you and ask you why you are carrying. If you seem rationale they will tell you someone complained but that is all. If you are dressed in Gang colors, or insisting the martians are coming or hanging out near the US President you will probably go to jail.
The problem with this scenario is that unless he was waving the gun around or making threats he was not GATTTOTP. So they arrested him, set an unusually high bail, and the feds asked that he not be ALLOWED to post bail for a questionable charge. Yeah, there is a lot of circumstantial evidence in the situation. But if they were looking to charge him with something and make it stick they seem to have screwed that up. I can't think of anyone I have seen get convicted of GATTTOTP that was not actively threatening someone with a gun. And it usually seems to get tossed for other charges anyway. If this gets tossed and he sues, it will be Asheville that has to pay dearly and the feds that seem to have pushed the issue will not pay a dime.
Oh, and has anyone actually read that he was OC? I understand the officers saw the firearm. But he could have been poorly concealed as well. I have heard nothing for sure on that issue.
I prefer to live dangerously free than safely caged!
"Our houses are protected by the good Lord and a gun. And you might meet 'em both if you show up here not welcome son." Josh Thompson "Way Out Here"
But yes is should be a given that OC will often generate more attention
Abort the Obamanation not the Constitution
Those who would, deny, require permit, license, certification, or authorization for me to bear arms are as vile, dangerous & evil as those who would molest, abuse, assault, rape or murder my family
Ninety-eight percent of the ugliness could simply be avoided by handling it at the point of the 911 call, allowing that legal and non-threatening activities don't justify heavy-handedness. It's not nervous-nellie-fear enforcement ... it's LAW enforcement. There shouldn't continue to be a question about that, with the folks we hire to help keep crime under control.
Is it a law written explicity giving one permission to carry, or is it that there is just no law prohibiting OC. Is OC a right given by a written law, or simpy one exercised in the absence of a law prohibiting it? Causing a public alarm is a law enforcable by penaltys. There are no rights or privilages that do not have restrictions. My state is either OC or CC. However I prefer to CC. Even in the old west many towns banned the open carry of firearms. Expect to see more negative attention on guns as more idiots like this attemt to make a statement just because they are trying to make some kind of point. Discreetness and common sense would serve us better than an just because I can agenda.