Should a free citizen be required to accept an inconvenience for the sole purpose of making Governments job easier? Should a free citizen be required to show proof on demand of his compliance with the law? Or as some radical types believe should the Government only detain a person if they have a reasonable belief that a crime is or has been committed?
Originally Posted by Wolf357
In a State that requires a permit to carry, how is a LEO to know if someone carrying a handgun in plain sight possesses a valid permit to do so if they don't politely ask to see it?