This is a discussion on Man who carried AR-15 on his back inside mall says charges not warranted within the Open Carry Issues & Discussions forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Man carrying gun on his back in mall is charged with a crime I dunno. Why ask for trouble?...
Man carrying gun on his back in mall is charged with a crime
I dunno. Why ask for trouble?
Preparing for the Zombie Apocalypse or Rapture....whichever comes first.
Just because you can doesn't mean that you should. Regardless of legality, open carrying an AR inside a mall breaks a social norm. OC the same gun out in the woods or near a range, and nobody would care.
I'm curious if people dressed in traditional Middle Eastern apparel were arrested for inciting panic after 9/11. After all, they should know that lots of people were afraid of Muslims because of the attack. They shouldn't have rocked the boat; why didn't they just dress like everyone else?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Though defensive violence will always be a sad necessity in the eyes of men of principle, it would be still more unfortunate if wrongdoers should dominate just men -St. Augustine
Appears to have been in southeast Texas (Beaumont), where the only OC lawfully allowable is a rifle, and about the only manner of carrying it in a clearly non-threatening manner is the way shown in that photo.
According to police he was charged with "disorderly conduct because he displayed a firearm "In a manner calculated to alarm." It'll be interesting to hear them attempt to identify a manner of carrying that wouldn't be "calculated" (likely?) to alarm some. It's not as though gripped in both hands before him would be taken as anything but deploying the weapon. Slung over the shoulder or back can hardly be construed to be deploying it, not even by the most knee-jerk of "authorities."
To me, this charge is simply a variant of the GATTTOTP statutes. They're too darned vague to be supportable, when simply going about a normal and customary manner of carry. IMO, such situations should be taken as such, so long as it's lawful and the person is clearly not acting in a threatening manner in any way.
No defensive use for this fire arm with his hands full and all. IMO I think the charges will be dropped, but still a silly thing to do.....
Don"t let stupid be your skill set....
Hobbit lives matter....
Never be ashamed of a scar. It simply means, that you were stronger than whatever tried to hurt you......
he was asking for it.. I wish they did an open carry walk here in colorado though that sounds interesting!
Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet. – Gen James Mattis USMC
While not the smartest action, and one that most would reasonably anticipate a negative result (albeit public perception, police hassle, etc.) I find it hard to believe he would be convicted of "disorderly conduct because he displayed a firearm in a manner calculated to alarm." Carrying it on his back facing barrel down and his hands not even on the gun hardly seems disorderly or a manner calculated to alarm. Now, if it were on his front with his hand on the grip and other hand on the forward stock, perhaps. In any event, do something to get attention and don't be surprised when you get it.
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
Actually, I wish people like him would stop doing that. It's hard enough with all the anti-gunners looking for any excuse to ban us from everything.
When we got on the plane, I spoke with the captain, he was in tears. He had watched the entire thing and he said the looks they were giving me behind my back was priceless. So they moved my seat so i could sit closer to them on the plane.
I am not always an A-hole but it does come easy to me.
To the original post. That dude is not smart enough to own an AR. Anyone that tells me that taking an AR to the mall in the US is acceptable needs to pull their head out and take a deep breath.
My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon.
NRA Life Member
GOA Life Member
Behave Like Someone Who is Determined to be FREE!
His case is one Id like to have. I believe, depending on the statutes, that he can win that case.
A right not exercised is a right lost. I think CC actually has hurt the gun rights issue.
People dont know that they are around good people with guns all the time, as they are concealed. That leaves only images of BGs, psycho killers, and LE as those with guns, and most good folks dont want contact with any of those groups.