Crimson Trace question

Crimson Trace question

This is a discussion on Crimson Trace question within the Related Gear & Equipment forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I recentl purchased a Smith and wesson 340 J-frame. I want to put on some CT grips. My friend has LG-305s on his they are ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Crimson Trace question

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array jwhite75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    5,319

    Crimson Trace question

    I recentl purchased a Smith and wesson 340 J-frame. I want to put on some CT grips. My friend has LG-305s on his they are oversized tacky rubber. The thing I dont like is the oversized part. I have been looking at the LG-105 also but they are hard polymer. I know the rubber serves to aid in felt recoil reduction. My question is who has shot or knows about both of these to tell me the difference in felt recoil between the two. This will be a pocket gun and want to keep it as small as possible.
    Friends don't let friends be MALL NINJAS.


    I am just as nice as anyone lets me be and can be just as mean as anyone makes me. - Quoted from Terryger, New member to our forum.


  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Array TX-JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    5,739
    The LG-105's are the same material as the standard "boot grips" that comes on the 642, I believe... can't comment on the recoil difference...
    "Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas!".... Sam Houston

    Retired LEO
    Firearms Instructor
    NRA Life Member

  3. #3
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,924

    Post

    Have you looked at the LG-405 ?
    They are the compact rubber overmold for the S&W J-frame.
    Here is the link to that page on the Crimson Trace website.

    Laser sights for Smith and Wesson Handguns | Crimson Trace Lasergrip Laser Sights

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array jwhite75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by QKShooter View Post
    Have you looked at the LG-405 ?
    They are the compact rubber overmold for the S&W J-frame.
    Here is the link to that page on the Crimson Trace website.

    Laser sights for Smith and Wesson Handguns | Crimson Trace Lasergrip Laser Sights
    Yes I have....and as dumb as it sounds I just dont like the look of them. They look like a balloon half inflated on the gun. Silly I know...but thats just me.
    Friends don't let friends be MALL NINJAS.


    I am just as nice as anyone lets me be and can be just as mean as anyone makes me. - Quoted from Terryger, New member to our forum.

  5. #5
    Member Array Hill Country's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    51
    I think the main difference between the 305's and the 405's is that the 305 is a longer grip which allows/needs less of a "grip filler". The shorter 405's need the fatter/fuller stock to wrap your fingers around. (That make any sense?)

    I carried a (non-airweight) model 36 for years. Wasn't rated for +P, but did fire a few stout handloads. Never thought much about the recoil.

    A couple of years ago my DW gave me an airweight 638 for Christmas. It was basically the same as my 36 without a rust or pocket snagging problem and I could still fire SA if desired. But right from the first I found it unpleasant to fire. I shoot enough to stay proficient, but no more and I can't say I enjoy it.

    Not the same kind of boom and muzzle flip of a magnum, more like having the palm of the hand slapped with a ruler kind of unpleasant - different from the 36.

    I added the LG405 laser grips, not expecting it to reduce the sting (although I'm sure it helps), but because I found the 638 much less accurate than my 36. May have been the sights are off, or my old(er) eyes, flinching, or just the damn short sight radius, but they make a huge difference in accuracy.

    And the bottom line is I chose the 405's over the 305's because they are more concealable. If the recoil is really objectionable, I'd suggest some mild target loads for proficiency at the range. Save the +P's for the real thing when recoil will be the last thing on your mind.

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Crimson Trace fit in VM2?
    By gogamecocks in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 15th, 2010, 02:57 AM
  2. M&P 40c w/Crimson Trace?
    By ajgranda in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: September 19th, 2009, 08:18 PM
  3. LG-405 Crimson Trace; LOP question...
    By Gideon in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: December 6th, 2008, 02:08 AM
  4. Crimson Trace Question
    By JPP in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: December 28th, 2007, 02:44 PM

Search tags for this page

crimson trace 305 recoi?
,
crimson trace 305 reviews
,
crimson trace 405 review
,
difference between crimson trace lg-405 and lg-105
,
difference between crimson trace lg105 and lg405
,
difference between lg 105 and 405
,
difference between lg-305 and lg-405
,
difference between lg105 and lg 405
,
does a 105 laser grip have a sticky surface like a 305
,
lg-105 crimson trace review
,

smith and wesson 638

,
whats the difference between the crimson trace 105 and the 405
Click on a term to search for related topics.