Kansas Governor Signs Castle Doctrine Clean Up Bill
This is a discussion on Kansas Governor Signs Castle Doctrine Clean Up Bill within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Monday, April 19, 2010
Today, Governor Mark Parkinson (D) signed Senate Bill 381 into law. This bill, more commonly known as “castle doctrine” legislation, will ...
-
April 20th, 2010 02:16 AM
#1
Member
Array
Kansas Governor Signs Castle Doctrine Clean Up Bill
Monday, April 19, 2010
Today, Governor Mark Parkinson (D) signed Senate Bill 381 into law. This bill, more commonly known as “castle doctrine” legislation, will make important corrections to Kansas’ current self-defense statute.
The recent Kansas Supreme Court Ruling in State v. Hendrix stated that if a person threatens force instead of actually using deadly force, the individual is not entitled to a self-defense jury instruction and could be charged with aggravated assault. The ruling was applied to an individual who threatened force (but never discharged the firearm), when his fiancée was assaulted and was subsequently charged and given a felony conviction. He is now a prohibited person for exercising his God-given right of self-defense.
NRA has diligently worked with the legislature in both chambers to make sure that Kansas citizens’ self-defense rights are clearly articulated to minimize the chances that the State Supreme Court will misinterpret the legislature's intent.
NRA-ILA :: Kansas: Governor Signs Castle Doctrine Clean Up Bill
http://www.kslegislature.org/bills/2010/381.pdf
I believe that this is the State v. Hendrix case that the judge used as a guideline for his ruling....
http://www.kscourts.org/Cases-and-Op...1023/97323.pdf
-
April 20th, 2010 02:16 AM
Remove Ads
-
April 20th, 2010 08:59 AM
#2
VIP Member
Array
I am glad to hear that this matter has been resolved! Anyone living in Kansas could have been in the same situation and would have been convicted as a felon as poor Hendrix was for defending his fiancee and for sparing the life of the perpetrator. Lunacy! Thank God the governor had common sense and did the right thing by signing this bill.
God bless our troops!

-
April 20th, 2010 12:37 PM
#3
VIP Member
Array
That's pretty bad if you can get out of a shoot situation without shooting and then get shafted for it. I guess they figure it's better all around if you shoot the BG.
-
April 20th, 2010 03:16 PM
#4
Senior Member
Array
Two other things that the Gov should do is fully pardon Hendrix and get that judge off the bench. Oh yeah, FIRE the Deputy prosecutors who brought the case; IMMEDIATELY! (I guess that makes 3 things the Gov should do.)
-
April 20th, 2010 03:44 PM
#5
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Rob P.
Two other things that the Gov should do is fully pardon Hendrix and get that judge off the bench. Oh yeah, FIRE the Deputy prosecutors who brought the case; IMMEDIATELY! (I guess that makes 3 things the Gov should do.)
Yeah seriously.....
Hendrix was seriosuly wronged by the system. In fact I think he should take it to the Federal level appeals process if he has too.
-
April 20th, 2010 08:59 PM
#6
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Rob P.
Two other things that the Gov should do is fully pardon Hendrix and get that judge off the bench. Oh yeah, FIRE the Deputy prosecutors who brought the case; IMMEDIATELY! (I guess that makes 3 things the Gov should do.)
The Legislature made the law "retroactive", which means any cases which someone was convicted on that basis, will have their cases reviewed and reversed. I applaud them for including that.
I agree that no DA should have filed charges if someone pulled a wepaon due a threat, and the threat terminated at that point as a result. It shows the importance of looking at what the law doesn't say and does say, and not read into it what we think it it is implying.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By Eagleks in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 19
Last Post: November 24th, 2012, 02:07 AM
-
By DaveH in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 4
Last Post: February 3rd, 2010, 08:45 PM
-
By mstarn in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 12
Last Post: June 12th, 2006, 03:10 PM
-
By toytek065 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 3
Last Post: May 4th, 2006, 06:24 PM
-
By Rock and Glock in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Replies: 12
Last Post: March 5th, 2006, 11:51 PM
Search tags for this page
bills 2010 381 kansas
, castle doctrine in kansas
, castle doctrine kansas
, castle law kansas
, does kansas have a castle doctrine
, does kansas have a castle law
, does kansas have castle doctrine
, does kansas have the castle doctrine
, does kansas have the castle law
, kansas castle doctrine
, kansas castle doctrine 2010
, kansas castle doctrine law
, kansas castle doctrine laws
, kansas castle law
, kansas senate bill 381