Michigan passes "Castle Doctorine"

Michigan passes "Castle Doctorine"

This is a discussion on Michigan passes "Castle Doctorine" within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Self Defense bills 5142-43,5153 and 5548; and Senate Bills 1046 and 1185 have all been passed by the Senate as of today June 7,2006 Michigan ...

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Michigan passes "Castle Doctorine"

  1. #1
    Member Array glockman31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ypsilanti, Michigan
    Posts
    67

    Michigan passes "Castle Doctorine"

    Self Defense bills 5142-43,5153 and 5548; and Senate Bills 1046 and 1185 have all been passed by the Senate as of today June 7,2006


    Michigan Senate approves self-defense bills
    6/6/2006, 5:28 p.m. ET
    By DAVID EGGERT
    The Associated Press

    LANSING, Mich. (AP) The state Senate approved legislation Tuesday aimed at fortifying and clarifying self-defense rights in Michigan.

    The bills would allow people to use deadly force, with no duty to retreat, if they reasonably think they face imminent death, great bodily harm or sexual assault. They could use deadly force on their property or anywhere they have a legal right to be.

    The legislation also would protect people from civil lawsuits if they have used force in self-defense.

    The six-bill package is backed by the National Rifle Association but opposed by anti-gun groups. The Senate voted 28-10 and 30-8 to pass two bills, and plans to send the other bills in the package to the House Wednesday.

    Critics said the legislation is dangerous and not needed because prosecutors already don't charge a person who has justifiably used deadly force to protect themselves.

    "We're creating a wild west mentality in this state and I oppose it," said Sen. Liz Brater, an Ann Arbor Democrat who voted against the bills.

    But Sen. Alan Cropsey, a DeWitt Republican and sponsor of one bill, cited a case where an Eaton County woman was sued after defending her husband during an attack. She won the suit but incurred legal expenses.

    "This type of nonsense needs to end," said Cropsey, adding that much of the legislation codifies existing judge-made law.

    One bill would require judges to award attorney fees to those who are sued when it's determined they had reasonably used force to act in self-defense.

    Another bill would create a "rebuttable presumption" a legal advantage that assumes, unless there's strong proof to the contrary, that people honestly and reasonably believe they face death, rape or great bodily harm when someone breaks into their home.

    The presumption, however, would not apply in certain domestic violence situations, disputes involving family members or the police, and if the person using force is breaking the law.

    The House already has approved earlier versions of some bills.

    Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm has expressed concerns that the scope of the House legislation is too broad. But spokeswoman Liz Boyd said Tuesday the governor is leaning toward supporting the legislation after Senate changes.

    Supporters say the legislation is needed partly because current law requires people to first retreat, which supporters say puts them at a disadvantage.

    Critics worry the legislation could spark a shoot-first, ask-questions-later mentality that winds up with innocent people getting shot.

    One Republican Shirley Johnson of Troy and nine Democrats voted against a bill allowing deadly force to be used in self-defense: Brater, Irma Clark-Coleman of Detroit, Gilda Jacobs of Huntington Woods, Burton Leland of Detroit, Bob Emerson of Flint, Hansen Clarke of Detroit, Martha Scott of Highland Park, Buzz Thomas of Detroit and Gretchen Whitmer of East Lansing.

    Eight of them not including Whitmer and Jacobs voted against the bill creating a rebuttable presumption.
    Eric


    There were NO Guns used to take over the flights on 9-11, IT STILL HAPPENED

    Wake up Americans - GUN CONTROL - Means WE LOOSE


  2. #2
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Good news.

    Critics worry the legislation could spark a shoot-first, ask-questions-later mentality that winds up with innocent people getting shot.
    They want to check out FL - where no rivers of blood have occurred as a consequence!
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  3. #3
    Distinguished Member Array ArmyCop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Chickasaw, AL
    Posts
    1,841
    Ours (Alabama) just recently passed - very similiar to yours. Hey, Florida hasn't had any problems with theirs & have had it long enough now that if it were gonna be a problem it'd already be a problem by now.
    For God, Family and Country!

  4. #4
    Distinguished Member Array RSSZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,843
    Hey Michigan, good on ya. Another state added to the list of, "if your a GG,....then your a GG,that simple".

    No blood flowin' in the streets down here in Flah-Dah or Al-Bama. Not a single ok corral type shootout either. Imagine that !!

    Congrats Michigan. Hard work pays off. ------

  5. #5
    VIP Member
    Array Miggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Miami-Dade, FL
    Posts
    6,258
    Hooray Michigan! And echoing RSSZ's comment, no OK corrals anywhere down here in SoFla..... Suddenly lots of polite people though...
    You have to make the shot when fire is smoking, people are screaming, dogs are barking, kids are crying and sirens are coming.
    Randy Cain.

    Ego will kill you. Leave it at home.
    Signed: Me!

  6. #6
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Away - Health Problems
    Posts
    17,352
    Sweet

  7. #7
    Member Array toytek065's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    wisconsin
    Posts
    35
    Just Got A Letter From My Wisconsin State Rep Concerning All The Calls Me And My Wife Made To His Office When Our Castle Doctrine Bill Was Being Cosidered. He Regreted To Inform Me It Did Not Even Make It To The Discussion Stage And That It Would Have To Wait Till The Next Session. Not Even Discussed, Can You Beleive How Unimportant This Issue Seems To Be To Some People? Till It Changes, I'm Supposed To Run And Try To Hide First. I Guess We'll Take Our Chances With The System Till They Get It Right.

  8. #8
    VIP Member Array Tubby45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Making ammo.
    Posts
    3,054
    Little hard to read when the first letter of every word is capitalized.

    In WI, there is common law no duty to retreat, same as MI. They are now just trying to take that common law and make it into statutory law and add immunity for civil liability, which the common law doesn't.

    Right now, in WI, I personally think getting concealed carry passed is the number one priority. This has been a 14 year struggle and trust me, the "castle doctrine" can wait. CCW is #1.
    07/02 FFL/SOT since 2006

  9. #9
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,222
    Alright. Glad to see my state coming around to common sense thinking. Seems WI is where MI was about 7-10 years ago
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. FL Castle Doctorine test cases
    By socuban in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: May 15th, 2008, 09:06 AM
  2. Castle Doctorine & Deadly Force or "Please Don't Shoot Me On Duty!"
    By Mark Garrity in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: August 9th, 2006, 08:53 AM
  3. Alabama "Castle Doctrine" Law Signed
    By dr_cmg in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 4th, 2006, 09:58 PM
  4. Georgia House Passes "Castle doctrine" Statute!
    By Rock and Glock in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 25th, 2006, 05:18 PM
  5. Oklahoma "Stand Your Ground" Bill Passes
    By Rock and Glock in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 15th, 2006, 05:22 PM

Search tags for this page

bills 5142-43

,

gun-defense bills are house bills 5142-43

,

michigan castle doctorine

,

michigan castle gun

,

michigan house bills 5142-43

,

michigan senate bills 1046 and 1185

Click on a term to search for related topics.