Brady Center joins fight over state gun rights

This is a discussion on Brady Center joins fight over state gun rights within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Brady Center joins fight over state gun rights - State & Regional - Wire - TheState.com Tuesday, May. 18, 2010 By MATT GOURAS - Associated ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Brady Center joins fight over state gun rights

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array Patti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Show Me State
    Posts
    2,644

    Brady Center joins fight over state gun rights

    Brady Center joins fight over state gun rights - State & Regional - Wire - TheState.com

    Tuesday, May. 18, 2010
    By MATT GOURAS - Associated Press Writer

    HELENA, Mont. -- The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence is joining the federal government's fight to stop states that want to exempt themselves from national gun control laws, arguing the effort threatens public safety.

    The gun control advocates and the U.S. Department of Justice both filed new arguments Tuesday in the ongoing legal battle over federal gun control and states rights.

    The issue was sparked with the "firearm freedoms act" first enacted in Montana last year and subsequently in several other states, and is leading to a constitutional showdown over the reach of Congress into state borders.

    The states argue they should decide which rules, if any, would control the sale and purchase of guns and paraphernalia made inside their borders. The state would then be exempt from rules on federal gun registration, background checks and dealer-licensing.

    Attorneys general in Montana, Utah, Alabama, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Wyoming and West Virginia subsequently signed on to help the gun advocates who launched the lawsuit last fall.

    The Brady Center said that the effort is misguided, and threatens public safety by making it easier for dangerous people to get guns and potentially allowing "the sale of virtually untraceable firearms."

    The group was joined by other gun control advocates, including the Montana Human Rights Network, who all argued that states with loose gun laws could allow the sale of guns to criminals who could then take them across state lines.

    The Justice Department argued that the courts have already decided Congress, with its power to regulate interstate commerce, can set standards on such items as guns. It pointed to a case where the court ruled federal ban on marijuana pre-empted state rules.

    "That concern is no less important here, where an illegal market for firearms exists across state lines," the federal government's court brief said in asking for a quick dismissal. "In essence, Montana will create weapons that are readily accessible to those who seek to avoid a background check, with no record of transaction and no traceable markings."

    It said the firearms freedom acts would stimulate the illicit interstate market in firearms.

    The gun advocates previously argued in court filings that that authorities could freely prosecute those who cross borders with guns bought under the state rules. They pointed out it would be illegal to take a made-in-Montana gun outside of that state.
    Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. Winston Churchill

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Distinguished Member Array Tally XD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    1,831
    Ahhh yes, the Brady Bunch. I guess they have to do something to continue getting Federal funding.
    I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.
    - Barack Obama Chicago Tribune, April 27, 2004

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array Eagleks's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    7,724
    I hope Montana wins this one, I think it's key that limitations be put on the Fedl Govt's forcing States into things... based upon the interstate commerce clause. This is only one of them. Healthcare, is another.

  5. #4
    VIP Member Array hogdaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    N/E Florida
    Posts
    3,289
    The Brady Bunch, Wish they would get a DIVORCE!!
    H/D
    A Native Floridian = RARE


    IT'S OUR RIGHTS>THEY WANT TO WRONG
    H/D

  6. #5
    Member Array CenterOfMass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    140
    The Brady Campaign being involved is a good thing! Everything they touch turns against them! They are obviously on the wrong side of this issue and more importantly, on the wrong side of history!

    Stay vigilant!
    EDC - S&W M&P .45

    "The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take." Thomas Jefferson

    http://www.gunrightsreport.com

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Brady Center fundraising total to combat OC falls a little short
    By paramedic70002 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: July 1st, 2010, 02:09 AM
  2. Brady Center fails Better Business Bureau test
    By paramedic70002 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 28th, 2010, 10:40 PM
  3. Zero correlation of Brady Center scores with (preventing) violence
    By dnowell in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 29th, 2010, 05:02 PM
  4. Brady Center at it again
    By jahwarrior72 in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: December 5th, 2008, 09:46 AM
  5. Brady center trains LEOs?
    By paramedic70002 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: September 17th, 2007, 04:45 PM