A. The lower court puts the smack down on Chicago, based on the SCOTUS decision, resulting in further refinement/enhancement of the Right.
B. The lower court finds some convoluted way to waffle or be wrong, leaving us all hanging, waiting for SCOTUS to revisit.
C. The lower court drops the case since Chicago capitulated with new laws.
D. The lower court incorporates the new Chicago laws into the case.
D. 1. Case is decided favorably to the 2A, enhancing the Right.
D. 2. Case is decided unfavorably to the 2A, restricting the right.
D. 3. Case is decided favorably to the 2A with a rubber stamp, no further interpretation.