POLITICALLY CORRECTED Glossary of Terms

This is a discussion on POLITICALLY CORRECTED Glossary of Terms within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; by Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America Part One -- The Concept Certain words hurt you when you\'re talking about your rights. People who ...

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: POLITICALLY CORRECTED Glossary of Terms

  1. #1
    CHPBill
    Guest CHPBill's Avatar

    POLITICALLY CORRECTED Glossary of Terms

    by Alan Korwin, Author
    Gun Laws of America

    Part One -- The Concept

    Certain words hurt you when you\'re talking about your rights.

    People who would deny your rights have done a good job of manipulating
    the language so far. Without even realizing it, you\'re probably using
    terms that actually help the people who want to disarm you.

    To preserve, protect and defend your rights in this critical debate, you
    need effective word choices.


    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    PRO GUN

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    PRO RIGHTS

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    GUN CONTROL

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    CRIME CONTROL

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    ANTI-GUN MOVEMENT

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    ANTI-SELF-DEFENSE MOVEMENT

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    SEMIAUTOMATIC HANDGUN

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    SIDEARM

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    CONCEALED CARRY

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    CARRY or RIGHT TO CARRY

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    ASSAULT OR LETHAL WEAPON

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    HOUSEHOLD FIREARMS

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    SATURDAY NIGHT SPECIALS

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    RACIST GUN LAWS

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    JUNK GUNS

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    THE AFFORDABILITY ISSUE

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    FULL CAPACITY MAGAZINES

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    SECOND AMENDMENT

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    BILL OF RIGHTS

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    ANTI GUN

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    ANTI-GUN BIGOT or ANTI-GUN PREJUDICE

    ====================================

    They want you to say (and you lose if you say):
    ANTI GUN

    It\'s better to say (and they lose if you say):
    ANTI RIGHTS

    WHEN THEY SAY
    Guns kill

    YOU SAY
    Guns save lives

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    Guns cause crime

    YOU SAY
    Guns stop crime

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    Guns are too dangerous to own

    YOU SAY
    Then you should take a safety class

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    Guns are too dangerous to own

    YOU SAY
    Then don\'t trust the boys and girls in
    the military and police with them

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    People shouldn\'t have guns

    YOU SAY
    You shouldn\'t be required to have one

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    The only purpose of a gun is to kill

    YOU SAY
    The main purpose of a gun is to protect

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    People shouldn\'t have guns

    YOU SAY
    Only the good people should have the guns

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    Guns should go away

    YOU SAY
    Then you should personally sign up to never
    have a gun in your life, under penalty of felony
    arrest, as you would ask of me.

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    They should take all the guns away

    YOU SAY
    Bad guys first

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY:
    We need more gun laws

    YOU SAY:
    Everything criminal about guns is already illegal

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY:
    Why would anyone want to own a gun?

    YOU SAY:
    You\'re kidding, right?
    You mean you really don\'t know?
    Well, why do you think the police have guns?

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    We\'re not really against people having guns

    YOU SAY
    What sort of guns do you think
    people should have, and why

    ====================================

    WHEN THEY SAY
    Do you really have a gun?

    YOU SAY
    Of course, don\'t you?

    Then just give it a rest and watch where it goes. You\'ll hear their
    litany, replete with flaws. Don\'t rebut, seize the moment, listen hard
    and learn -- then just raise an eyebrow and think, \"How \'bout that.
    Feller doesn\'t even own a gun. It takes all kinds.\" Then talk about
    something else. And boy, does the disjoint hang in their craw.



    -------------------------------------------------
    Part Two -- THE GLOSSARY
    Part Two -- THE GLOSSARY



    PRO RIGHTS
    A more accurate, and far more compelling term than the common \"pro
    gun.\" The reverse term, which describes them, is \"anti rights.\"
    Misguided utopian disarmament advocates love the phrases \"pro gun\" and
    \"anti gun\", because they automatically win when they\'re used. They
    believe the righteous path is to be anti gun, because only devils would
    be pro gun. You flat lose if you allow a debate to be framed that way.

    The debate is really between people who are \"pro rights\" and \"anti
    rights\" (and then you automatically win), because the righteous choice
    between pro rights and anti rights is obvious. You\'re pro safety; pro
    self defense; pro freedom; pro liberty; pro Bill of Rights (correctly
    casting them as anti safety; anti self defense; anti freedom; anti
    liberty; anti Bill of Rights). This is an accurate depiction of people
    who would restrict, repress and flat-out deny civil rights you and your
    ancestors have always had in America.



    ANTI RIGHTS
    A more accurate, and far more compelling term than the common \"anti
    gun.\" The reverse term, which describes you, is \"pro rights.\" Fight
    the desire to cast repressionists as \"anti gun,\" (and by so doing
    casting yourself narrowly as \"pro gun\"). Instead, always refer more
    broadly to the \"anti-rights\" posture they take. Make them argue rights,
    not guns.



    CRIME CONTROL
    What \"gun control\" used to mean, and a generally good idea (the phrase
    \"gun control\" has morphed to mean \"disarm the public\" and thus should be
    avoided, more on this later). Everyone basically agrees there should be
    crime control, so it is good grounds for détente. A common sense and
    reasonable proposal. Includes forcibly disarming criminals. Emphasizes
    the differences between criminals and an armed public.



    GUN BIGOT
    A person who hates guns. Typically has little or no personal knowledge
    of guns, may never have even fired one, certainly doesn\'t have any.
    Would subject innocent people to defenselessness without compunction.
    An elitist. One with an irrational and morbid fear of guns that is
    ignorant and immoral. Spews bile and venom at guns, gun owners,
    gun-rights advocates, gun-rights associations, pro-Bill of Rights
    legislators. Striking similarity and direct parallels with racial
    bigotry before (and even after) the civil rights efforts of the 1960s.



    GUN BIGOTRY
    The notion that you can only own a gun if it is expensive, or passes a
    drop test, a melting point test, a consumer products test, a government
    design test, a caliber size, an ammunition capacity, a lock test, etc.
    The notion that only idiots, miscreants, red necks, dim bulbs and other
    nasty-named people would own guns. The notion that you can only vote,
    oops, I mean have a firearm, if you pass a test run by your government,
    and pay the tax, often called a \"fee.\" The notion that anyone who fails
    the tests -- or any other qualifications -- automatically forfeits their
    rights \"for the common good.\" An inability to distinguish honest people
    from criminals.



    GUN PREJUDICE
    Discrimination against honest people merely for their legal ownership or
    possession of firearms. A common occurrence in society today. A
    violation of your constitutional and natural rights. Gun prejudice
    appears to be a federal civil-rights offense, punishable by prison and
    fine. Now there\'s a thought. Repressionists have attempted some very
    novel court challenges to laws that protect our liberties. Turnabout\'s
    fair play. If there were, say, a city bank somewhere that refused
    customers simply because they legally handled firearms...



    AFFORDABLE FIREARMS
    Anti-rights bigots curse these as \"junk guns\" and \"Saturday night
    specials,\" racial epithets you should never use. The racist goal of
    outlawing guns unless they\'re expensive is self evident and
    reprehensible. A woman who eats inexpensive food and drives an
    inexpensive car doesn\'t lose her right to protect her family because she
    can only afford an inexpensive gun.



    SIDEARM
    Or would you rather use the complex and dangerous sounding (though
    accurate perhaps) \"semiautomatic handgun,\" a term which many people
    think means machine gun, according to Handgun Control (who recommends
    use of the term \"semiautomatic handgun\"). Unfortunately, \"handgun\" has
    been vilified beyond usability, and needs to be retired or at least
    back-burnered for now. Remember, it was the so-called Brady \"handgun\"
    law that federalized all retail sales of rifles and shotguns.



    PISTOL
    Or would you rather use the complex and dangerous sounding (though
    accurate perhaps) \"semiautomatic handgun.\" A basic, reliable, standard
    type of pistol, a regular pistol, an ordinary pistol, the same kind of
    pistol anyone would normally own. A basic, reliable, standard type of
    sidearm, a regular sidearm, an ordinary sidearm, the same kind of
    sidearm anyone would normally own.



    HOUSEHOLD FIREARMS
    The type any household is likely to have. All the firearms you own,
    despite constant name-calling from the media, are just household
    firearms.



    GOVERNMENT GUN
    The only kind you can now buy in America at retail.



    BASIC SELF-DEFENSE GUN
    Any type of firearm that could save your life in an emergency.



    CARRY
    Expunge the word \"concealed\" because so many people hear it and believe
    only a criminal would conceal something. It implies you have something
    to hide. Because being discreet is a common sense, reasonable measure,
    there\'s no need to demean it with an ugly adjective (in this use anyway)
    like \"concealed.\" \"Carry license,\" not \"concealed-carry license.\"



    LETHALITY
    The quality of a gun that makes it useful as a crime-stopping,
    life-saving, defensive tool. A point that is attacked subtly in most
    anti-rights arguments. When met head on, the issue works against the
    anti-rights position. Caliber and capacity restrictions reduce
    lethality and your ability to save yourself or the state. Reducing
    lethality costs lives. Why should police need more capacity than you,
    when you both face the same criminals. How few bullets may a person use
    against an attacker, and how small should they be.

    Guns are dangerous. They\'re supposed to be dangerous. They wouldn\'t be
    any good if they weren\'t dangerous. Anything that makes them less
    dangerous by reducing lethality puts you (or police officers) at
    unacceptable risk.



    ANTI-SELF-DEFENSE MOVEMENT
    People who believe you have little or no right to defend yourself if
    attacked, because social order may only be imposed by an authority, and
    that such authority is superior to your right to exist (if push comes to
    shove). Also sometimes referred to as socialists. Sometimes expressed
    as your right to keep a cell phone handy to dial 911. The
    anti-self-defense movement is often deceptively portrayed as the
    \"anti-gun movement.\" Never let them hide behind their comfortable
    disguise as anti gun.



    POLITICALLY CORRECTED
    Language that does not automatically bias a debate about the Bill of
    Rights against individual liberty and freedom. Opposite of \"politically
    correct\" language, which is basically socialist in nature. We all
    recognize that \"political correctness\" is \"incorrect,\" and then we sneer
    and dismiss it. We do this at great peril, however, for PC statements
    treated that way don\'t just go away, they fester and insidiously modify
    the paradigm, and bend our thinking into acceptance of that which we
    have verbalized as \"correct.\"

    You want a good example of neurolinguistic programming and
    transformational grammar on a national scale, there it is to a tee.
    It\'s how we get to the Orwellian point where war is peace, freedom is
    slavery, ignorance is strength.



    BILL OF RIGHTS
    More broadly appealing and less polarizing than \"Second Amendment.\"
    Sure, I like the Second Amendment, and talk about it all the time. But
    saying \"Bill of Rights\" protects you from malicious stigma and
    stereotyping as a gun nut. Much more difficult to oppose, slows the
    bigots down. All the rights count, don\'t they, and they\'re all under
    attack. Bill of Rights Day. Pro Bill of Rights. I support the Bill of
    Rights, don\'t you? Actually, even virulent gun haters and gun bigots
    champion the First Amendment and other parts of the BOR, which, if
    you\'ll recall, was a single amendment (with separate articles) to the
    Constitution.



    SUNSHINE GUN LAWS
    Laws that encourage gun safety training and responsible firearms
    ownership, as opposed to repressive laws that criminalize honest gun
    ownership and infringe civil rights. Civil rights.



    THE FIRST AMENDMENT
    Stop saying Second Amendment so much, since the other side tunes this
    out immediately, and marginalizes you as a gun nut. Say \"First
    Amendment\" instead, and make your comparisons there -- does the
    government jeopardize your First Amendment rights? You betcha! Should
    you be concerned? Of course! What would you think of Internet
    censorship, government approved religion, font size limits, restricted
    word choices, acceptable word counts, licensed writers, training and
    testing before publishing controversial editorials, and tests for
    accuracy -- now there\'s a nice parallel.

    People on all sides recognize there are threats to free speech,
    religion, privacy and more from our friends, the government. The same
    root problems affect the whole Bill of Rights, gun rights are no
    different than other rights under attack.



    GUN-SAFETY CLASSES
    Something that, with all the accidents reported in America, all
    Americans should be taking -- from the tens of thousands of trainers out
    there. Always encourage people on both sides of a debate to take a real
    class. Why wouldn\'t an honest person take a gun-safety class? Going
    out for some wholesome and relaxing target practice, with friends.
    Getting good at marksmanship. Target practice. Marksmanship. These
    words have not been defiled and cast a good light, use them. Privately
    promoted gun-safety training days. Talk up the goal of \"National
    Accident Reduction\" through education and training. Private enterprise
    should vigorously swell to fill the gaping theater called, \"We need more
    safety.\"



    ROWANITES
    Anti-rights bigots who secretly own guns themselves, rely upon armed
    guards for security, or live inside communities with private security
    forces, but decry your right to arms. Closet gun owners. Named in
    honor of Carl Rowan, a vicious anti-gun bigot whose syndicated newspaper
    column vilified guns and gun owners for years, to a vast audience, until
    he one day fired at a trespasser near his home.



    GUN BUYUPS
    Gun buy back programs are misnamed. You cannot buy back something you
    didn\'t own in the first place. Since the Brady law prohibits dumping
    such guns into criminal lairs (gun buyers must be certified by the FBI
    these days), there is no longer justification for destroying firearms
    collected in buyups. That\'s right, there is no longer any justification
    at all for destroying firearms collected in buyups. When buyups are
    government funded, meltdowns are therefore wanton destruction of a
    public asset, and someone deserves to be held liable. Tax dollars are
    buying legal property simply to destroy it, when the only way to sell it
    is to certifiably law abiding individuals. What an outrage.

    Where I live, savvy collectors have set up shop at widely publicized gun
    buyups to make competitive bids and cherry pick the merchandise,
    pre-smelter.



    DEMOCIDE
    Murder committed by government. The most prevalent form of murder,
    responsible this century alone for 170 million deaths. Regime-ocide.



    GUN CONTROL
    Now generally synonymous with \"disarming the public.\" Using the phrase
    \"gun control\" in its currently twisted form distorts the debate and
    should be avoided; it is the other side\'s rallying flag, bolstered every
    time the words leave your lips; argue about gun control and you\'ve
    already lost. Use \"crime control,\" \"accident reduction\" and \"disarming
    the public\" to distinguish issues and preserve accuracy.

    Listen hard when you hear the term \"gun control\" in the news. You\'ll
    notice they\'re basically not talking about controlling crime. They\'re
    talking about controlling you.

    Always start by asking what a person means when they say this phrase,
    then shut up and see. Often, people who think of themselves as being
    anti gun, unwittingly adopt the position that only the rulers should be
    armed (cop and army guns OK, but not you; such a person isn\'t anti gun
    at all, they\'re simply anti rights -- your rights).

    When a \"gun-control law\" regulates or demeans honest people in the false
    name of controlling crime, that\'s actually tyranny. When \"gun control\"
    controls your right to have a gun, that is people control. The phrase
    \"gun control\" is a dangerous misnomer (some would say euphemism) for an
    agenda now actively pursued by a segment of society -- that would
    consolidate power solely in \"official\" hands.

    Help seize the metaphor back:

    1. Drop into conversation how your gun control at target practice
    recently was better than usual, or how you have pretty good gun control
    but you still need some lessons. Invite someone to your gun-control
    class at the range next Tuesday -- free style target practice. A well
    advertised gun-control class might attract some pretty interesting
    neighbors. Jokes about gun control (\"a steady hand\") are
    neurolinguistically challenged and don\'t help. Say something else funny
    if you must be funny.

    2. When reporters and others inevitably ask, \"Are you in favor of gun
    control?\" they often don\'t realize their question is as biased as, \"Are
    you still beating your wife?\" So it\'s up to you to show them. They\'re
    looking for a pro or con answer, and then a question of how much. Don\'t
    play into it. Instead, try responding, \"Well me, I\'m in favor of crime
    control. How about you?\"

    3. When you write about so-called \"gun control\" or so-called
    \"gun-control laws\" always put it in quotes, to disparage it.



    THE HENIGAN/BOGUS THEORY
    Named by Dave Kopel in honor of its two leading proponents (Dennis
    Henigan and Carl Bogus). This is the notion, first arising a few
    decades ago, that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual
    right. It stands in opposition to the fact that \"the people\" means all
    of us, and is responsible for the widely armed population we observe
    today. Covered more thoroughly in an earlier article of mine, The Big
    Lie (posted under Position Papers at http://www.gunlaws.com). Kopel\'s
    recent paper on this, for the St. Louis University Public Law Review, is
    nothing short of brilliant. David can be reached at
    http://www.independenceinstitute.net.



    COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
    A tool for reaching closed minds. The use of questions to point out
    fundamental illogic, which can then topple the notions a person builds
    on that flawed base. An application of the Socratic method. The mental
    awareness that forms when a simple question challenges fundamentally
    held beliefs. Here are many. One at a time is usually enough for most
    minds.

    If a registration list makes sense for the Second Amendment, would it
    make sense for the First Amendment?

    Are criminals and an armed citizenry the same thing?

    So why do people these days carry guns anyway, and does it ever work?

    Should it be against the law to defend yourself?

    If a person can\'t have a gun, why should the police have them?

    So if you are allowed to defend yourself, how many bullets can you use?

    Shouldn\'t we disarm the criminals first?

    Why haven\'t we disarmed the criminals?

    Why don\'t they arrest all the Brady criminals they find?

    Are you against an armed citizenry?

    Do you believe that only the rulers should have guns?

    Now let me see if I understand this; when you say \"gun control,\" do you
    mean \"stop crime\" or \"disarm the public\"?

    Now let me see if I understand this; when you say you\'re anti gun, do
    you mean you want to disarm the police and the armed forces?

    If you don\'t want to disarm the police and military, you\'re not really
    anti gun at all. You\'re anti private gun. Why is that?

    You know, after listening to you for a while, you\'ve convinced me that
    you should never own a gun.

    I\'m against the idea that you should be forced to own a gun, and I would
    stand up for your right to not be armed.

    Maybe you could sign up to be permanently disbarred from ever owning a
    gun. Would you do that (as you would ask me to do)?



    Closing Note:

    This article doesn\'t end here. In attempting a document like this, I
    know I can never reach its ending. It defines a path which simply
    stretches forward.

    If I wait until I have this evolved to my satisfaction it will never
    wrap. These ideas are too important to let wait that long. Consider it
    an early peek at a work in progress.

    Alan.



    \"Social balance has evolved into a war of the metaphor --
    neurolinguistic programming meets George Orwell.\"
    -- Alan Korwin

    ---------------------------------------------
    Alan Korwin is the author of seven best-selling books on gun law,
    including \"Gun Laws of America -- Every Federal Gun Law on the Books,
    with Plain English Summaries,\" and gun owner guides for AZ, CA, FL, TX,
    VA. This paper is part of an ongoing series, click Position Papers on
    the home page, or write or call for copies.



    BRAND NEW --
    \"Licensed to Carry\" by Greg Jeffery
    Check out this 30-State Shall-Issue License Guide,
    find out what it takes to get a carry license in each state.
    Use the link below.

    ALSO --
    50-State Traveler\'s Guide to the Gun Laws
    Use the link below.

    LOOK AT \"GUN LAWS OF AMERICA\" YOURSELF --
    If you knew all your rights you might demand them.
    Use the link below.

    AVAILABLE AT LAST:
    Gun owner guides for New York and Utah.
    Use the link below.

    Contact:
    Alan Korwin
    BLOOMFIELD PRESS
    \"We publish the gun laws\"
    12629 N. Tatum #440
    Phoenix, AZ 85032
    602-996-4020 Phone

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Member Array Gunzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    22
    Thank you Alan,

    Once I began reading this post I could not take myself away. Suddenly I don\'t feel so alone! I intend to print this post and keep a copy with me in my travels.

    Once again,

    Thanks.:kay:

  4. #3
    VIP Member
    Array Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The Old Dominion
    Posts
    5,050
    Thanks for posting that Bll.

    Something along these lines I did to a friend\'s very anti-rights wife. I asked her if she would call the police if someone was breaking into her house. She said yes. I asked her why. She said because they would protect her. I asked her how they would do that. The light went on at that point. She has an irrational fear of guns, and I haven\'t been able to change it in more than a few years. Go figure.

  5. #4
    Senior Member Array GoodSamaritan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Central Kentucky
    Posts
    790
    Good topic!

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. The most fun, most politically incorrect event of the summer...
    By Siafu in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: June 27th, 2010, 02:13 PM
  2. Politically Corrected.....Very good reminder!
    By CaptOFD92 in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 22nd, 2008, 07:32 PM
  3. Bullet Glossary
    By Captain Crunch in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 12th, 2006, 06:59 PM