A teacher would like some help!
This is a discussion on A teacher would like some help! within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I am currently a student teacher at a public high school, and I will have the opportunity this week to teach about the Second Amendment. ...
8Likes
-
May 30th, 2011 05:43 PM
#1
Member
Array
A teacher would like some help!
I am currently a student teacher at a public high school, and I will have the opportunity this week to teach about the Second Amendment. While I am certainly capable of planning a lesson, I thought I would seek the wisdom of the forum for further suggestions regarding:
-Resources. Know any good high school appropriate videos that I could show in class? Other resources?
-Approach. I want to impart knowledge without becoming preachy (which would likely get me in trouble with parents and administration). Should I focus on the history and intent behind it (play it safe), or focus more on current issues (more interesting, but more risky)? What about CCW? What has worked best in your experience?
Thanks in advance for your help. I will be checking on this later, but right now I need to finish my Work Sample!
Current armament:
Ruger 10/22
Remington 870 Express 20ga.
S&W M&P40c
S&W 642
-
May 30th, 2011 05:43 PM
Remove Ads
-
May 30th, 2011 06:31 PM
#2
Distinguished Member
Array
I would think that you may want to cover the Bill of Rights as a whole, so as not to appear that your intent was to only teach about the Second Amendment.
Good luck on your commendable endeavor!
"Historical examination of the right to bear arms, from English antecedents to the drafting of the Second Amendment, bears proof that the right to bear arms has consistently been, and should still be, construed as an individual right." -- U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings, Re: U.S. vs Emerson (1999)
-
May 30th, 2011 06:58 PM
#3
VIP Member
Array
Don't forget to bring your .50 BMG for show-and-tell!
Trust in God and keep your powder dry
"A heavily armed citizenry is not about overthrowing the government; it is about preventing the government from overthrowing liberty. A people stripped of their right of self defense is defenseless against their own government." -
source
-
May 30th, 2011 07:00 PM
#4
VIP Member
Array
I'd start with the historic view and intent behind it, and then move into current issues surrounding it. For the current views I'd focus on DC vs. Heller and McDonald vs. Chicago, Supreme Court decisions. I's stay away from the concealed carry aspect, since in theory it is completely separate and not directly related to the 2A.
Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.
USAF Retired
NRA Life Member
-
May 30th, 2011 07:20 PM
#5
VIP Member
Array
Avoid the topic. As a former public school teacher I know this will not end well for you. Wait til the bureaucracy gets their hands on you. I was that history teacher who'd cover controversial topics and I'd end up in the principals office too often.
I don't carry a gun to look for or start a fight. I carry one to finish a fight I never wanted to be in.
-
May 30th, 2011 07:28 PM
#6
Senior Member
Array
2nd Amendment
While we all propound our 2nd amendment rights daily, you may wish to start with the Federalist Papers which discusses the founding father reasoning in adopting our Constitution for our Republic. Authored by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay.
If time is short, the Bill of Rights in total is another welcome thought as mentioned by a previous post.
Sigmund Freud associates retarded sexual and emotional development not with gun ownership, but with a fear and loathing of weapons!
-
May 30th, 2011 07:49 PM
#7
Senior Member
Array
I think you should cover the history and intent of the 2A, along with its application (and the whole BoR) to the states via the 14th amendment. The Heller opinion would be nice, too.
Here is a link to the exact page of The Congressional Globe which quotes John Bingham (principal framer of the 14th Amendment) speaking in Congress, less than 2 years after the 14A's ratification, about its purpose and intent to apply the Bill of Rights to all the states.
Since you are a member here, I assume you have a CHL. I would avoid the subject altogether, knowing what happens to teachers in Oregon who have CHLs.
-
May 30th, 2011 08:06 PM
#8
Member
Array
Just a bit of clarification: this lesson is a part of a whole unit on the Bill of Rights. Last week we spent a day and a half on the First Amendment, and I will be teaching the Second and Third Amendments on the same day.
I was figuring that I'd avoid the CCW aspect, but it was nice to get some affirmation on that point. I'll need to work on deflection tactics, as I am almost certain it will come up. The kids like controversial issues (a couple are surprisingly political already as sophomores), so it will take a little doing. Thanks for the input so far. Keep it coming!
Current armament:
Ruger 10/22
Remington 870 Express 20ga.
S&W M&P40c
S&W 642
-
May 30th, 2011 09:35 PM
#9
VIP Member
Array
I'm most likely not qualified to answer this question, but to play it safe, I would say steer clear of discussion about CCW and just stick with the facts about the 2nd Amendment itself as written, maybe the cases of DC vs. Heller and McDonald vs. Chicago, and the Supreme Court decisions. If the kids bring up CCW, then the ball is in your court. You can play it risky and discuss, or you can play it safe and just advise them that that is not the issue up for discussion at this time and you won't be getting into that.
NRA Member
Kahr PM9 Glock 19 XD9sc
Kahr CW9 Glock 26
Ruger LCR Ruger LCP
-
May 30th, 2011 09:39 PM
#10
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
rammerjammer
Avoid the topic. As a former public school teacher I know this will not end well for you. Wait til the bureaucracy gets their hands on you. I was that history teacher who'd cover controversial topics and I'd end up in the principals office too often.
And this is why our country is falling apart starting with the youth, because teachers are afraid to teach what MATTERS. But alas its your choice, and your respected recommendation.
"I believe that the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms must not be infringed if liberty in America is to survive." - Ronald Reagan
-
May 30th, 2011 09:41 PM
#11
Ex Member
Array
Man you are really rocking the boat here, Can't you talk about normal Government school stuff like same sex marriage or transgender equality or something like that? Geez....
-
May 30th, 2011 09:45 PM
#12
Senior Member
Array
Can you "steal" some stats form Gary Kleck (FSU)? He is a life-long Democrat, but is honest in present his findings.
-
May 30th, 2011 10:52 PM
#13
Member
Array
One thing that I think it's important to point out is what type of rule the founding fathers were coming from. People forget about the historical context of the 2A and focus on the literal words.
For example, the concept of a militia was distinct from that of a standing army and was actually intended to be a protection from a standing army. The founders had witnessed the local militias in England being disbanded and disarmed so the standing British army would be able to control the populace without any interference. It is the people that were to bear arms under 2A, not the government so the argument that they were talking about an army isn't accurate.
The free state that is mentioned in the 2A was in contrast to a tyrannical state. The stress is on the word "free" not the word "state." They weren't attempting to protect the state from outside invasion. Instead, the militia was considered a protection from the government itself. They were extremely worried about seeing the U.S. quickly returning to tyrannical rule if the populace was disarmed.
Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.
- Mike Tyson
-
May 31st, 2011 01:37 AM
#14
VIP Member
Array
Some good quotes to work with here. Particularly James Madison's, since he penned it.
Quotes* See the Founding Fathers quotes on gun rights and freedom.
"A people armed and free forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition and is a bulwark for
the nation against foreign invasion and domestic oppression."
James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President
My hat's off to you for taking this on! It's much needed these days. 
To add to Gruntingfrog. The "free state" was literally the state's themselves. And the thought that Armed citizens of the state could defend themselves against an out of control federal Government.
"Suppose that we let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal: still it would not be going to far to say that the State governments with the people at their side would be able to repel the danger...half a million citizens with arms in their hands"
James Madison, The Federalist Papers
Last edited by chiefjason; May 31st, 2011 at 01:40 AM.
Reason: add link
I prefer to live dangerously free than safely caged!
"Our houses are protected by the good Lord and a gun. And you might meet 'em both if you show up here not welcome son." Josh Thompson "Way Out Here"
-
May 31st, 2011 07:34 AM
#15
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Dleavitt
I am currently a student teacher at a public high school, and I will have the opportunity this week to teach about the Second Amendment. While I am certainly capable of planning a lesson, I thought I would seek the wisdom of the forum for further suggestions regarding:
-Resources. Know any good high school appropriate videos that I could show in class? Other resources?
-Approach. I want to impart knowledge without becoming preachy (which would likely get me in trouble with parents and administration). Should I focus on the history and intent behind it (play it safe), or focus more on current issues (more interesting, but more risky)? What about CCW? What has worked best in your experience?
Thanks in advance for your help. I will be checking on this later, but right now I need to finish my Work Sample!
Depending on your students' demographics and your own interests ("race" relations is my field of research), you might want to watch the following two-part video, titled "No Guns For Negroes":
Part 1.
Part 2.
It explains the Jim-Crow-era origin of anti-gun legislation and "may issue" policies. In addition to giving you some background, parts of the film would be appropriate and of interest to high-schoolers. If the topic sparks your interest, I would be glad to recommend some peer-reviewed journal articles covering the same racialist origins of modern "gun-control" statutes.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
i would rather live dangerously free than be safely enslaved.
, i'd rather live dangerously free than safely caged
, i'd rather live dangerously free that safely caged
, legislator teachers need guns
, peer review articles on teachers carrying guns
, teacher
, thomas jefferson i prefer to live dangerously free than safely caged