This is a discussion on Baltimore(MD) Police Issue 2nd Amendment Decal Warning within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I guess a burrito decal on the rear bumper is a warning that approaching this vehicle an officer could be overcome with skillfully deployed chemical/biological ...
I guess a burrito decal on the rear bumper is a warning that approaching this vehicle an officer could be overcome with skillfully deployed chemical/biological air dispersed agent
"Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country,"
--Mayor Marion Barry, Washington , DC .
HTC Thunderbolt....4G Lightning Speed
These stupid type of bulletins come out all the time for a lot of different subject matters. Its nothing new. Its just some do gooder thinking up stupid ideas and thoughts to make themselves feel like they actually do something worth while.
"Just blame Sixto"
Here's the real deal on Maryland and the Second Amendment (although I feel sure thee is more to the story here):
A man shot and killed a pit bull in Severn Sunday after the dog and the man’s pit bull began fighting, according to Anne Arundel County police.
Police are also investigating whether the father was properly licensed to carry the firearm.
Unless I missed something during a comercial, it sounds to me like the wrong dog owner shot the wrong dog. His was the one off the leash and initiated the attack and he shot the dog that was leashed??? Hmmmm
I agree with "gigamortis" just avoid states like Maryland, Illinois, Wisconsin, and California, if I can't defend my life, then they can't have my money...not for gas, or food, or products, or merchandise, or especially taxes. I refuse to support stupidity!
"The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it".
Anyone want to bet whether they got permission to reprint the photo used off the website? Copyright infringement?
Not the best article for giving all the information . It does not say if the shooter was on his own property and I am still confused about which dog he owned. Again the dogs were fighting from the articles account and no dog was attacking a human.
We tend to be straying from the original OP's subject matter.
Some kids were walking a pit, unleashed, and they came across a lady and girl, walking another pit, which WAS leashed.
The dogs began to fight, one boy runs home, tells his dad, and the dad comes running up and shoots the ladys LEASHED pit.
Crazy, but sounds like the city and the lady will take legal action against trigger happy pappy.
^^^^^^^^^^I agree with your comment^^^^^^^^^
And would also submit Canada and Mexico as well.
No it did not ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
indicate in the article that any dog was attacking a person.
I don't understand why the moron did not subdue and take control of his own animal.
I would be willing to wager, a Judge in Maryland will be asking him that very same question shortly.
I would rather die with good men than hide with cowards
If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy."
M&Pc .357sig, 2340Sigpro .357sig
So, they may like this shirt either, huh.....
2A NOT for Huners White T-Shirt by rightthings- 10423488
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --- Will Rogers ---
Chief Justice John Roberts : "I don't see how you can read Heller and not take away from it the notion that the Second Amendment...was extremely important to the framers in their view of what liberty meant."
There was an incident a year or so ago when an off-duty federal police officer (Pentagon?) shot a dog at a dog park. I seem to recall he was investigated/prosecuted because he was not authorized to carry off-duty, thus he was not authorized to be carrying in the state of Maryland.
It is, quite simply, a very gun unfriendly state.