Liberal Courts Still Gunning Against Second Amendment Rights
This is a discussion on Liberal Courts Still Gunning Against Second Amendment Rights within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by Gene83
The arguments already being made somewhere although I can't recall where. If reciprocity passes that means that people who would not ...
October 20th, 2011 08:06 PM
Not at all. There is nothing to prevent a state from not honoring a non-resident permit for its own residents. The reciprocity bills only say that a state must honor the permit a visitor to that state has from his own state.
Originally Posted by Gene83
As for the other embedded issues, plenty of states already honor permits for their own residents which are issued by other states. PA being a famous example given all the confusion in the minds of the Philadelphia police on the matter.
The reciprocity bills would put an end to some of the goofy court rulings as it would be clear that Congress has taken a position on citizen's right to carry and how that can be accomplished.
As it is, neither Congress nor the SC has spoken on the matter outside of the LEOSA legislation; and that is a tad different because if pertains to a specific population and not to all honest citizens with clean records.
If the Union is once severed, the line of separation will grow wider and wider, and the controversies which are now debated and settled in the halls of legislation will then be tried in fields of battle and determined by the sword.
October 20th, 2011 11:15 PM
It was quoted from the Forbes article, but i believe you are correct on the case upon future review.
Search tags for this page
commentary: liberal courts still gunning against second amendment rights
gunning against meaning
if the courts members shift to a liberal side will second amendment be challenged
leosa and states not honoring it
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors