Texas "Castle Law" (ennacted 2007)
This is a discussion on Texas "Castle Law" (ennacted 2007) within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Find a way to pay for your CHL as soon as possible.
If you have to make some temporary sacrifices to do so, it will ...
January 9th, 2013 01:09 PM
Find a way to pay for your CHL as soon as possible.
If you have to make some temporary sacrifices to do so, it will be worth it.
This is an investment in your personal safety.
Texas CHL Course = $99.99
50 rounds of ammunition for CHL proficiency test = $14
Texas CHL Application Fee = $140
Electronic Fingerprinting = $9.95
Photos for your I.D = $10.99
Total cost = $274.93
Getting your Texas CHL = Priceless
To get started click here: TxDPS - Concealed Handgun Licensing
NRA Life Member
GOA Life Member
Behave Like Someone Who is Determined to be FREE!
January 9th, 2013 01:15 PM
Yikes. That's expensive.
Originally Posted by 1MoreGoodGuy
In Oregon, it's a straight $65 for application/processing fees ($50 for renewal), and that's it.
January 9th, 2013 01:46 PM
Something to keep in mind:
Originally Posted by Xader
Oregon plus 17 States
Texas plus 34 States
NRA Life Member
GOA Life Member
Behave Like Someone Who is Determined to be FREE!
June 21st, 2013 05:02 PM
Be careful in Houston
I just got off the phone with a Houston LEO. He said once you enter city limits of Houston, the bullets need to be separate from the handgun if you do not have a CHL. This is an ordinance that some cities may have.
Originally Posted by buttercups
June 21st, 2013 05:25 PM
I thought the CHL for Texas was high,but,i'm hearing they are tryimg to raise S.C. to a 100.00..But i would try to afford it,especially,IF what GuitarTex said,is true...You have to have bullets separate from the gun,once you enter in the city?.That's a really stupid law.smh.It makes no sense.
June 21st, 2013 06:29 PM
I'll let someone more definitively knowledgeable respond to post 19 by Guitar Tex. I think his information
is not correct because of state preemption. However, I can also imagine some weasel way in which
the City could have skirted the state law.
What we do know from the past is that Houston has been less than enthusiastic about some of what
our state legislature has done on gun matters, and that lots of stuff that isn't right can be defended via
word-craft by a DA. That said, I think post 19 is plain wrong.
@ Guitar Tex, as a new poster here you'll learn that many here are very skeptical of almost anything posted
and want to see the code, not a third hand opinion about it. And even when we have code in front of us, we'll
often debate what it really means.
So, back to the original poster's concerns and my suggestion. Obtaining the CHL would free our OP from
most concerns about local LEOs and DAs making up their own rules or misinterpreting existing rules. It still can happen of course,
because we are using the English language and some are using their creative intellect. But your greatest safety
from being falsely accused would be to have the CHL. Save some money and some time and just do it if at all possible.
If the Union is once severed, the line of separation will grow wider and wider, and the controversies which are now debated and settled in the halls of legislation will then be tried in fields of battle and determined by the sword.
June 21st, 2013 06:43 PM
Actually, and I don't mean to put varob on the spot, I think that is the wrong thought to have 'need a gun to defend yourself'.
Originally Posted by varob
PEOPLE, we don't carry guns to defend ourselves, we don't have guns in the car to defend against other drivers, we ONLY have a firearm to keep us or our loved ones from being KILLED by an armed predator who is targeting us. We don't have a firearm to defend others (strangers) or to be a sheepdog (you are not a policeman, you do NOT know the circumstances well enough to insert yourself).
Having a firearm may give you more courage not to just run away from a crime like a startled bird, allowing you to be a good witness and to call 911. It may give you enough of an illusion of safety to go out at night should you need to, especially single females or the elderly - if so, great.
It's clear that the majority of firearm users are only interested in target shooting 99% of the time. Having a firearm is, to them, like having seatbelts, or a fire extinguisher, or a smoke detector or it's a tool like a cell phone. It's not a 'license to insert yourself into a dangerous situation'. What good is it if you go to jail for shooting someone (or the wrong person in an altercation) and your loved ones are at home unprotected?
We have a great responsibility, just like driving a car, and must operate and deploy our firearms as a method of not dying at the hands of an armed predator and as a last ditch method for staying alive. That's the CONCEPT that keeps us safe, while protected to a degree.
A firearm must not be your FIRST solution, it is not the solution to every situation. That's why I say don't think of it as a 'self-defense' solution.
Now having said that you CAN use it to keep from being grievously injured from a disparity of force attack or keep a woman from being raped, and so forth. But the best way to 'defend' against those things is not to be in bad places with bad people at bad times. Have a layered defense.
OTOH, if you do carry outside the house (and I recommend it for the elderly, females, weaker, smaller individuals, the disabled - those who can't really escape or run) have umbrella insurance. It's extremely cheap. Have legal counsel on speed dial. KNOW the laws in your area. Keep your car in good repair and up to date and drive within the speed limit so you don't get stopped. Be super courteous to everyone. Remember, you don't know whether that the person you were just nice to is a serial killer and he's decided not to focus on you.
These ideas should just be one's attitude. Every dangerous situation is different. We all want to go home alive, nobody wants the burden of harming or killing anyone least of all the wrong person.
These concepts are a bit divorced from reality, just as handgun use is (for example we know that 1 million potential attackers are dissuaded from attacking in the US each year simply by producing your firearm which is brandishing in many places and is illegal - yet, to me it's better than shooting someone's 20 yo kid with 'issues').
Just learn the laws, have umbrella insurance, keep your mouth shut if you have to shoot, only shoot in the gravest extreme, and have a lawyer on speed dial. 99.99% of us who like firearms will never have to use them other than to perforate paper targets, and really, that's all we want to do. You shoot someone and kill them and I guarantee your love of going to the range is going to be gone if you have a conscience.
June 21st, 2013 11:26 PM
No true. Read 46.02 below where it says "on or about his or her person". Just don't get out of the vehicle with it on you.
Originally Posted by Tundra03
PC §46.02. UNLAWFUL CARRYING WEAPONS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if the person is not:
(1) on the person's own premises or premises under the person's control; or
(2) inside of or directly en route to a motor vehicle or watercraft that is owned by the person or under the person's control.
(a-1) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun in a motor vehicle or watercraft that is owned by the person or under the person's control at any time in which:
(1) the handgun is in plain view; or
(2) the person is:
(A) engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic or boating;
(B) prohibited by law from possessing a firearm; or
(C) a member of a criminal street gang, as defined by Section 71.01 (C)
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
July 17th, 2013 04:01 PM
[QUOTE=Yoda;2225046]The cost a CHL overall is under $400 (not including gun), while that is a pretty penny for some people it is definitely worth it.
Lets take this to the next step.....this is for 4 years on the first application, and the renewal drops to less than half of that. So if you figure the cost of a license over a 9 or 10 year period, (which you hve to do, because no one is getting a license for just one year) the cost per year is somewhere in the $30 to $60 range, excluding cost of ammo and weapons.
July 17th, 2013 05:09 PM
The problem with a firearm that can not be taken out of the car except at home is the firearm is vulnerable to theft.
CHL will fix this in most cases and allow you to be legal.
As far as Houston is concerned, leaving that _______ ______ place was best thing I have done for my self in a long time.
NOT LIVING IN FEAR, JUST READY!!!
I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness,
nor the arrow for its swiftness,
nor the warrior for his glory.
I love only that which they defend.
July 17th, 2013 05:52 PM
Any Texas Lawman that doesn't know about this law should turn in their badge.
July 27th, 2013 11:43 AM
You can also legally carry in your recreational vehicle, travel trailer, camping trailer, truck camper, motor home, and horse trailer with living quarters.
Originally Posted by mcp1810
July 27th, 2013 11:52 AM
No permit required at all in WY. National Constitutional Carry and National Castle Doctrine ftw.
Originally Posted by Xader
July 27th, 2013 12:10 PM
Well, that is not exactly correct that you can only take your gun out at home. You can take your weapons out at the shooting range, at your business, your second apartment for your girlfriend(boyfriend), at the ranch, deer lease, barn, and also at the motel when travelling. There may be others, but that all I can think of off hand.
Originally Posted by searcher 45
July 27th, 2013 12:43 PM
All law enforcement know this law, but, No need to print off 65 pages of laws. Just print off PC 46.03, which specifically allows carry in a vehicle being driven on a public road.
Originally Posted by charles1951
Search tags for this page
can i carry a gun in my car in texas
can i carry a gun in my car in texas without a chl
can you carry a gun in your car in texas 2012
castle law texas vehicle
texas castle law car
texas castle law vehicle
texas gun law in vehicle 2012
texas gun laws 2012
texas gun laws 2012 in car
texas gun laws in vehicles 2012
texas handgun laws in vehicle 2012
texas vehicle gun laws 2012
Click on a term to search for related topics.