Post By ANGLICO
Post By Chesafreak
Post By Hopyard
Post By oldrwizr
Post By GeorgiaDawg
Post By Cook74
May 31st, 2012 11:17 AM
Despite ‘Castle Doctrine,’ defendant is convicted in slaying - PA - Philly
By Mensah M. Dean
Daily News Staff Writer
Philadelphia Daily News
Posted: Wed, May. 30, 2012, 8:51 PM
...............The case underscores how uncertain the claim of self-defense can be, even in a state that revised its "Castle Doctrine" last year to give an individual the right to use deadly force in self-defense anywhere in which a person has a legal right to be. The revised law also eliminated the duty to retreat before using that force. Lowe’s case was featured in March in a Daily News article about the revision of that doctrine. (note: this is a paragraph down in the article that I pulled up front = out of order).
Current Ruling: ........A PHILADELPHIA JUDGE said Wednesday he was convinced that a disabled, retired Marine was being attacked in the moments before he fatally stabbed a man last October, but he concluded that the stabbing was still a criminal act rather than self-defense.
Common Pleas Judge Benjamin Lerner then convicted Jonathan Lowe, 57, of voluntary manslaughter and possession of an instrument of crime. The judge found him not guilty of the more-serious charges of first- and third-degree murder.
"When he had his hands around my neck, I pulled out my knife and started stabbing him," Lowe testified Wednesday.
Stretton noted that Lowe stayed at the scene and cooperated with police, believing himself to be the victim.
Stretton said case law barred him from introducing Manning’s 18 criminal convictions at trial because Lowe wasn’t aware of them and most of them were too old, the most recent from 2002. According to court records, Manning was awaiting trial for allegedly knocking out a woman’s teeth while robbing her two years ago Thursday.
My Comments: It's Philly, and we know who runs the machine there. Might as well be D.C. or Chicago. Also... Sounds like the guy needed a much better Attorney! A non-Jury Trial....?..........bad decision on this one in my opinion (which is not wort spit).
Read more (and turn on your Pop Up Blocker First) at: Despite ‘Castle Doctrine,’ defendant is convicted in slaying
May 31st, 2012 11:34 AM
The rest of the story is slightly different. The DA says there was evidence of him chasing the robber down stabbing him in the back and trying to stab him again while he was down. If he was down and no threat or fleeing the ruling may be accurate. I don't know the facts of the case. Only what was written.
Still seems like justice in this case was not served.
May 31st, 2012 12:00 PM
He was most llikely found guilty becuase he stabbed the BG in the back twice, taunted him, and tried to stab him some more.
Naylor seized on inconsistencies between the testimonies of Lowe and the students, including where the stabbing took place. She argued that before the students came upon the struggle, Lowe stabbed Manning from behind before both men ended up on the ground.
She noted that two stab wounds were in Manning’s back. She also said Lowe showed intent to kill with malice because after Manning fell mortally wounded, Lowe taunted him and even tried to stab him some more.
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson
May 31st, 2012 12:03 PM
Good, Bad guy dead!
Bad, good guy goes to jail!
May 31st, 2012 12:11 PM
Not a good guy if some of the comments above about chasing the BG down and stabbing him in the back are accurate.
Originally Posted by ericb327
That pretty much makes this the same sort of situation as that Pharmacist in Kansas who was convicted of murder.
As for the comment that he had a bad lawyer, maybe, maybe not. If you think the law is on your side
it is sometimes better to have a bench trial.
Philly isn't as bad as many folks including myself in the past think it is. It is different, and interesting,
and the Center City area seems to be improving. Also, nice interesting ethnic neighborhoods. Can't beat the
If the Union is once severed, the line of separation will grow wider and wider, and the controversies which are now debated and settled in the halls of legislation will then be tried in fields of battle and determined by the sword.
May 31st, 2012 12:14 PM
Based on what I've read, that's not real Castle Doctriney-type material there. More like two thugs getting their jollies.
May 31st, 2012 12:39 PM
It's incidents like these that are helpful for the average Joe to consider regarding home defense. Just because you are attacked in your residence doesn't mean you have the right to do whatever you want to do to the intruder. You have the right to defend yourself and stop the attack, not go all-out on them if they try to get away. Once the attack is stopped, you have to let the police take it from there.
"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast." - Ephesians 2:8-9
“The purpose of the law is not to prevent a future offense, but to punish the one actually committed” - Ayn Rand
May 31st, 2012 12:41 PM
This judge is very liberal in all his rulings in the past so I am not too surprised. I can understand the vet was probably high on adrenalin after a fight but I can't fathom him "going after the BG" using his wheel chair... BG had several convictions prior but not admissible??? BS
Hopefully, his appeal will work out for him...
RSO, WA. XDMc 9mm, S&W 642CT & 442 38 sp, 1947 Savage 99 300,
1972 Marlin 336 RC .35, 1922 Walther Model 4, 1933 Walther DSM 34, High Standard 1954 22LR
I prefer to be judged by 12 then carried by 6
May 31st, 2012 01:42 PM
Sounds like the guy needed a much better Attorney! A non-Jury Trial....?..........bad decision on this one in my opinion (which is not wort spit).
I second this
May 31st, 2012 04:45 PM
Can't imagine having such a thing tried by judge, and not by jury.
Seems to be conflicting information in the news reports, regarding the trial. From our vantage point, we don't have the full record of evidence and testimony, so it's hard to know. Still ...
A guy with a pacemaker and heart condition gets chased, as confirmed by witnesses, beaten with a metal pipe/pole, pinned and choked. According to at least one witness, they were on the ground for as much as 2mins. According to Lowe's testimony, he was accosted by three assailants, assaulted by one violently, and he used his own knife to fend off the attacker.
Unfortunately for him (Lowe), the knife wounds he ended up inflicting were all on the assailant's posterior (instead of anterior) surfaces, and he reportedly was heard by witnesses to have spoken the words: "Die, [expletive], die! This is what you did! You’re going to die!"
Even if all the prior information were true, in the mind of many those words could make it hard to claim victim status. Had he instead been heard to exclaim things like "Stop attacking me ... call the police ... I don't want to hurt you / stay down," I'm betting that claims he was the violent attacker would have fallen on deaf ears.
Whatever else, this case shows something very clearly, at least to me: it's not enough to merely be the victim; but it's just as important to be seen/heard to be the victim, so that the attacker is seen for what he/she is.
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
self defense (A.O.J.).
How does disarming
the number of victims?
Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos)
NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.
May 31st, 2012 05:01 PM
I work in Center City all day.
yes. yes it is. exactly as bad as many folks including yourself in the past thought it was.
-You know Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help.
-Susie, if you want to see your doll again, leave $100 in this envelope by the tree out front. Do not call the police. You cannot trace us. You cannot find us. Sincerely, Calvin
May 31st, 2012 06:01 PM
Re-read the story. Lowe was the one who was chased down, not the person killed.
Originally Posted by Hopyard
The stab wounds in the back don't bother me at all, they are rolling on the ground fighting, he stabs when he can, if his arm goes behind the guy and stabs him in the back, no different than a person turning to run just as you pull the trigger and end up shooting him in the back.
Two Temple University students said Manning was chasing Lowe and trying to hit him with a metal pole before he caught him. Manning then pinned Lowe to the ground, they said.
Mr. Lowe made 2 BIG mistakes. #1 was going with a bench trial versus a jury trial. #2 was living in Philly.
Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.
NRA Life Member
Search tags for this page
california castle doctrine
california castle doctrine 2012
castle doctrine pa
castle doctrine philadelphia
jonathan lowe philadelphia
lowe denied the castle doctren , philadelphia pa
mensah m. dean
pa castle doctrine
pa castle law
pennsylvania castle doctrine
philadelphia castle doctrine
the castle doctrine in nc knife pulling
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors