This is a discussion on Bloomberg: Working With Existing Gun Laws 'Just Preposterous' within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is he too stupid to understand? The Founding Fathers did not put ANY exceptions in the 2nd Amendment ...
What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is he too stupid to understand? The Founding Fathers did not put ANY exceptions in the 2nd Amendment and as such, ALL of the "laws" that came after it related to guns are blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL, regardless of what any legislate-from-the-bench judge might CLAIM. This includes NFA34 and GCA68. We need to take back our country from the liberals!
Even the folks on our side have a problem trying to determine what is or is not an infringement. We have members here who claim that banning machine guns is not an infringement on your right to keep and bear arms so long as you are able to keep other types of firearms. They claim that as long as they can carry or own their weapon of choice then no rights have been taken.Originally Posted by WilliamDahl
What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is he too stupid to understand?
If our side cannot agree on the meaning how can we expect the other side to understand what it means either.
Speaking of infringment, artilery has been mentioned when speaking of if there is a line to be drawn. Frankly if you can afford it then why not? The kind of people who would use artilery for war crimes already can afford it and nothing stops them. So if you can afford a howitzer, I think you should go ahead and buy one.
Understand that I am not a fool. Well not all of the time. I dont think anyone has the need to privatley own nuclear weapons. So that infrindgment is worthwhile, IMHO.
"The thing about quotes on the internet is that you can not confirm their validity."
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky. dangerous animals."
Nothing new about this sort of hypocrisy. Politicians demonize the "rich" when they are the rich. They want to take away our right to have firearms while they have them, themselves, and/or have a security detail that has them. They even want to ban our yummy food while eating that yummy food, themselves. You know what they say about politicians and diapers...
"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast." - Ephesians 2:8-9
“The purpose of the law is not to prevent a future offense, but to punish the one actually committed” - Ayn Rand