2nd Amendment misunderstood intentionally
This is a discussion on 2nd Amendment misunderstood intentionally within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; In a message dated 9/28/2006 1:21:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, email@example.com writes:
Thanks for the note.
I suggest you take a close look at my ...
September 28th, 2006 03:08 PM
September 28th, 2006 05:55 PM
US Paratroopers give the enemy maxnimum opportunity to give his life for his country
September 28th, 2006 07:39 PM
Oh Absolutely. They have already messed around with the original intent of the PA Constitution far too much.
Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ
October 2nd, 2006 02:15 AM
Isn't the Government representative of the people? When is it not? Who defines when an unjust infringement on 'The people' is made by the government? What defines the people? Example, if the government goes after a few people (perhaps 100-1000 wackos) that interpret the government is stepping out of bounds and infringing upon 2A rights, could these armed people not be considered a well maintained militia ensuring government does not infringe upon rights? Looks pretty gray to me. I'd like some clarification as this has always confused me. These 'freedom fighters' could also be categorized as terrorists. I suppose I would like to see where the line is drawn on infringement of rights and where the majority of consensus doesn't rule.
Originally Posted by ccw9mm
Question 2: can the 2A not be changed if the majority ask for it?
"J.C. -His pain, our gain" !!
October 2nd, 2006 01:53 PM
Partially in response to stever,
I do not believe the Constitution actually contains any "gray areas." Written in the language of the time, with all the supporting documents, it's intent was to be quite clear.
It is only the desire by people who wish to bend and twist it to suit their own notions of what they think it should have been, that has caused the confusion, essentially casting a dark shadow across plain, simple black and white, creating these so-called "gray areas."
None of our rights were granted by the Constitution, they were known to be pre-existing. The document enumerated some of them in order to guarantee their inviability for the future generations. As much is said in the document, itself.
Last edited by madmike; October 2nd, 2006 at 01:55 PM.
Political Correctness has now "evolved" into Political Cowardice.
By DaveH in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: May 14th, 2010, 11:10 PM
By TheShadow in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: March 9th, 2010, 10:21 PM
By aznav in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: October 19th, 2009, 03:53 PM
By heph in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: May 9th, 2009, 11:04 AM
By BigDaddy5 in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
Last Post: June 9th, 2006, 05:34 PM
Search tags for this page
2nd amendment is misunderstood
2nd amendment misunderstood
how is the second amendment misunderstood
is the second amend misunderstood
madison 2nd amendment misinterpreted
misunderstand the second amendment
secodn ammendment misunderstood
second amendment constitution misunderstood
second amendment misunderstood
second amendment misunderstood quotes
the 2nd amendment misunderstood
the constitution of the commonwealth of pennsylvania, as established by the general convention elected for that purpose,
the right to bear arms is intentionally misunderstood
Click on a term to search for related topics.