Progress, one county at a time. - Page 2

Progress, one county at a time.

This is a discussion on Progress, one county at a time. within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by HotGuns There will always be much argument about discretional enforcement, mostly by people that dont understand the concept or have never had ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 21 of 21
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Progress, one county at a time.

  1. #16
    Lead Moderator
    Array pgrass101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Quote Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
    There will always be much argument about discretional enforcement, mostly by people that dont understand the concept or have never had to use it. Its not something to be taken lightly, because at some point in time you'll have to justify your actions to people that can fire you if they dont happen to agree with your reasoning.
    I guess that is just one more check, the officer (or DA) can be fired or replaced
    A real man loves his wife, and places his family as the most important thing in life. Nothing has brought me more peace and content in life than simply being a good husband and father.

  2. #17
    Lead Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    I guess that is just one more check, the officer (or DA) can be fired or replaced
    Thats one way to look at it.

    I happen to think that the mayor,city council, or whoever made an illegal or unconstitutional law or allowed it to happen should be fired. That would take care of that, and any other politician that replaced those that were fired might take note and think about the responsibility that they are charged with before acting on their own.
    Universal Background Checks...the next step towards registration and confiscation.

    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...

  3. #18
    Distinguished Member Array BigStick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Gig Harbor, WA
    My first thought is "Awsome, win for the constitution!" Then my mind jumped to Obama's executive order giving amnesty to illegal aliens. Do we want law enforcement/legislators choosing which laws to enforce?

    I think I understand both sides of the argument. If it is unconstitutional, then it is an invalid law. But then, we have a legal process to bring the law to the courts for verification that it is illegal and then revocation. If you just choose to ignore it, it stays on the books and when you get a new prosecutor/etc. it can be enforced again. How about a middle ground where you initiate the process to get the law overturned, and while the law is being debated in the courts, you have more justification for not enforcing it since it is being challanged.

    I don't know. I don't have the legal background, or know the applicable state/federal laws that impact constitutionality issues, but just choosing to ignore it doesn't seem like the right course of action.

    I realize Obama's amnesty plan and this gun control issue are not the same, since being here illegally is most definitly not constitutionally protected, but I don't want to play by his rules.
    sigmanluke and pgrass101 like this.
    Walk softly ...

  4. Remove Advertisements

  5. #19
    Distinguished Member Array GunGeezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Apparently, states must be able to pass laws regarding gun control even though they seem to conflict with our 2nd Amendment rights. Otherwise, they would have been challenged from the get-go. Either they fall into that twilight-zone called states rights or the politicians and judges actually thought gun-control laws would actually keep guns out of the hands of criminals. It seems it only took about 200 yrs. for them to figure out that criminals don't obey laws and now some radical thinkers are questioning the Constitutionality of laws that only criminalize law-abiding citizens. That's progress for ya!

  6. #20
    VIP Member Array OldVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Hiding inside a bottle of Jim Beam Black in S. FL.
    Is this the state attorney's version of jury nulification?
    Retired USAF E-8. Curmudgeon at large.
    Lighten up and enjoy life because:
    Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... Buffalo Springfield - For What It's Worth

  7. #21
    VIP Member Array peckman28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    I like it. Unconstitutional is unconstitutional. The Constitution is written in plain English and it does not require "interpretation". It requires enforcement, and that includes enforcement of the Constitution against laws that are blatantly not permitted. The DA is doing his job, IMO.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search tags for this page

illinois law/rape in progress/shoot or not to shoot


jacksonville , illinois pellet gun laws

Click on a term to search for related topics.