Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever.

Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever.

This is a discussion on Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever. within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever. Published November 28, 2012. | By Bruce McQuain. Interested in seeing one of the dumbest attempts to counter an ...

Results 1 to 11 of 11
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Pro2A

Thread: Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever.

  1. #1
    VIP Member
    Array ANGLICO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    I'm the guy next door that is polite, but does not tell you crap.
    Posts
    3,589

    Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever.

    Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever.
    Published November 28, 2012. | By Bruce McQuain.


    Interested in seeing one of the dumbest attempts to counter an argument against reinstituting the “assault gun” ban?

    It’s, well, pretty pathetic, and, coming out of Media Matters, shouldn’t really surprise you.

    First the graphic that started it all:




    Read the rest: Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever. | Questions and Observations
    Socialism Kills! Time proven, with a very large body count! We are a Constitutional Republic....... not a Democracy, get it correct!

    Don't be mistaken for a Gecko45: http://lonelymachines.org/mall-ninjas/

    Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14qTdp-Dd30

    ANGLICO Images


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array nedrgr21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    3,675
    Yeah, when the ban first came out they did they same with a Marlin 60 .22lr b/c you could attach a folding, black, synthetic stock - idiots.

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array Smitty901's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,304
    They did not make a smart of truthful for argument the first time and it passed. It is all based on emotion not facts.
    This time it will not come to a vote, when the time is right An Executive order will be signed and put in place and enforced. Sure it will get to the Supreme court after a year or more of being up held by kangaroo courts. By then 1 new justice will have been appointed .Guess what 5 of 9 make all the rules has nothing to do with law ,right or wrong. It will not be allowed to go before the Court until one has been replaced.
    5 of 9 appointed Justices can over ride any law or right they choose. We held on last time by 1 vote.

  4. #4
    Ex Member Array Edward7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    middleboro, MA
    Posts
    153
    "Worst" implies some make sense.

  5. #5
    2xR
    2xR is offline
    Member Array 2xR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Boise
    Posts
    31

    Worst. Pro-Assault. Weapon. Ban. Argument. Ever.

    Quote Originally Posted by Edward7 View Post
    "Worst" implies some make sense.
    ROFLMAO - so true!!!


    Sent from my iPhone 5 - using Tapatalk.

  6. #6
    VIP Member
    Array msgt/ret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,407
    But it just feeeeeels so much more dangerous.
    When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
    "Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."

  7. #7
    Distinguished Member
    Array whoppo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    1,289
    Whatever you do, don't put a barrel shroud on that thing!
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    The Second Amendment *IS* Homeland Security
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------- Μολὼν λαβέ ----------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array bklynboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    584
    As usual the writer does not know what he is talking about. He claims that a collapsible stock is deadlier than a fixed stock because the fixed stock cannot be removed but the collapsible stock it can be removed. Yes, you can just slide off the collapsible stock but the mossberg fixed stock can be removed with one screw and replaced with a collapsible stock or a pistol grip in a matter of a few minutes

  9. #9
    Distinguished Member Array Pro2A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,933
    Quote Originally Posted by whoppo View Post
    Whatever you do, don't put a barrel shroud on that thing!
    Isn't that that shoulder thing that goes up?
    msgt/ret likes this.

  10. #10
    Member Array Sgt45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    262
    It's all about power and control over law abiding citizens who they deem as "stupid". If you aren't stupid then you are dangerous (to them) and need to be regulated to death. I can picture in my mind's eye, all progressives lined up against a wall... .

  11. #11
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27,083
    Quote Originally Posted by From the silliness
    The Tactical Persuader also has an adjustable stock that can be removed from the firearm completely, which allows the gun length to be shortened for increased concealability.
    Oh yeah! Adjustable LOP stocks allow me to easily stuff a ~32in monster down my pants. I think even a padded London Fog overcoat would have troubles covering up the fat butt on one of those bad boys.

    Hard to imagine the mentality that goes into such claims. Yes, shorter would make it more concealable, though nevermind the fact that it's hardly concealable anyway.

    I still laugh about the "barrel shroud" lunacy, to this day. Heat shields are the things that "go up," eh? Uh-huh ... every time I carry safely. But then, the whole thing points "up" at that point. Ah, me. Facts, facts, facts. Sticky little buggers, ain't they?
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

2nd amendment is the dumbest
,
assault weapon versus assult rifle reddit
,
dumbest pro gun ban argument ever
,
gun ban arguments
,

pro 2nd amendment arguments

,
pro assault rifle argument
,
pro assault weapon argument
,
pro assault weapons arguments
,

pro gun

,
pro gun pictures
,
worst arguments to ban guns
,
worst pro gun arguments
Click on a term to search for related topics.