More guns, more gun deaths - Page 9

More guns, more gun deaths

This is a discussion on More guns, more gun deaths within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Might I suggest a reading: A Piece of Wood, Ray Bradbury, 1978 While certainly the work of fiction, it makes an interesting, yet completely relevant, ...

Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 567891011 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 151
Like Tree99Likes

Thread: More guns, more gun deaths

  1. #121
    Senior Member Array Nebraska12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Omaha Metro
    Posts
    519

    Re: More guns, more gun deaths

    Might I suggest a reading:

    A Piece of Wood, Ray Bradbury, 1978

    While certainly the work of fiction, it makes an interesting, yet completely relevant, point....even with the barring or elimination of modern weapons, it will not erase the ill will, or hatred, amongst or created by man.

    Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk 2
    'Fortes Fortuna Juvat'
    NRA Member
    NRA Life of Duty Member


  2. #122
    Senior Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    15,034
    the 'big black gun' is not the problem.
    Actually the big black gun IS the problem. If you are are a ruler or a tyrant, that is precisley the gun that you dont want the unwashed masses to own. Why? Because it can be wickedly efficient at its job.

    So you do your best to convice people that it is in their best interests to not own it. Whether you do it buy buying politicians,Presidents, buying media outlets, chanting mantras or sponsering or funding organizations that are dedicated to bringing about its demise,manipulating statistics or even convincing your local priest to preach about them at Sunday Mass...how ever you do it is irrevelent as long as it works, because in their eyes the ends justifies the means.

    Make no mistake. Its not about the guns. It never has been and it never will be. Its about CONTROL.
    I would rather stand against the cannons of the wicked than against the prayers of the righteous.


    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...
    http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/

  3. #123
    Moderator
    Array Rock and Glock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Colorado at 11,650'
    Posts
    12,946
    Your Economist friend might appreciate this too:

    Why Not Renew the “Assault Weapons” Ban? Well, I’ll Tell You… Kontradictions

    You should well understand this:

    The fallacy of misleading vividness is when the thought, imagery or reality of something is so emotionally potent – positively or negatively – that you begin to overestimate the likelihood and frequency of its occurrence.
    Which would lead an economist (or any thinking person) to realize that a massive misallocation of resources is being foisted on the public by disingenuous and intellectually dishonest MSM and political class.


    The tyrant dies and his rule is over, the martyr dies and his rule begins. ― The Journals of Kierkegaard

  4. #124
    Member Array GunsAndViolince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    332
    That link on the Top 10 is really great. Regarding the top two: I wouldn't agree, but I could see the argument for banning tobacco, but banning doctors because of medical mistakes? That shows the absurdity of what we're facing in all the gun control talk quite nicely.

  5. #125
    Member Array oldtrucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Merritt Island ,Fl
    Posts
    24
    What really yanks my chain is that LESS than 2% of all people who own GUNS commit these heinous crimes! And of that 2% about half of those crimes ARE done with STOLEN GUNS THAT ARE STOLEN from LAW ABIDING citizens. BUT YET THE PUBLIC outcry to change the laws in a fashion that will make it ILLEGAL for the other 98% is just plain GOOFY. NEXT thing you know there will be an outcry to do away with traffic lights because people trying to beat the red light get in a crash. Does that make sense? No it doesn't because IF YOU RUN A LIGHT and get in a crash YOU ARE at FAULT. You made that decision No one made you do it. So before you get on the bandwagon to do away with guns REMEMBER that the person that pulls the trigger IS ALWAYS THE RESPONSIBLE party for doing so!

  6. #126
    Distinguished Member Array brocktice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    1,277

    Re: More guns, more gun deaths

    Quote Originally Posted by oldtrucker View Post
    NEXT thing you know there will be an outcry to do away with traffic lights because people trying to beat the red light get in a crash. Does that make sense? No it doesn't because IF YOU RUN A LIGHT and get in a crash YOU ARE at FAULT.
    This is actually true of red light cameras.

  7. #127
    Member Array Magnus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    22
    This threat doesnt really addres the issue. Our Bill Of Rights and the Constitution are attacked by liberal left constantly. Now its not legal to call someone a Lunatic for crying out loud. Enough....The UN Needs to stay out and our elected officials need to Honor our Heritage and the United States Consitution. The gun issue is that America Has their rights thats it....... educate the public but dont impose Communist rules......That Simple.

    Wake up

  8. #128
    Distinguished Member Array GlassWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    1,747
    The problem I really see is that logic has little to do with the final outcome in gun control. It's a party platform argument, so it doesn't matter if you prove the other side imbicilic or not, they'll "rationalize" their way around anything you present as an argument, or they'll cheat and play some race, or emotion card or try to change the topic or what have you. You can rarely if ever out-argue someone from another political parry, which is why Jefferson feared a two-party system so much. Never argue with a fool. He'll drag you down to his level, then beat you with experience.

    Our only hope in winning the 2A battle is in greater numbers, and using the law to our advantage, as we're fighting to keep our rights under the second amendment, not to gain some right we don't already have via the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Remember also, that an aggressor must vanquish to succeed. A defender need only survive. We need to survive the liberal onslaught.

  9. #129
    Distinguished Member Array RightsEroding's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,474
    I love how all these stats are thrown around.

    Q: What does 2+2= ?

    Accountant' s answer: What do you want it to equal?
    "When those who are governed do too little, those who govern can, and will, do too much." Ronald Reagan

    Do what you can; then do what you must

  10. #130
    New Member Array jcp907's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Seminole Cty, Fl
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktice View Post
    what about the argument that we shouldn't have the guns and the violence in the first place?
    It's a hypothetical question, so, my thoughts are below to the argument: If we didn't have the guns in the first place:

    Our ancestors may have starved to death, or have been killed by native Americans.

    If we were still here, we’d be driving on the left side of the road.

    We would be complaining about how much taxes we have to pay…to the Queen.

    We’d likely have violent crime rates that are much higher than they are now. The United States violent crime RATE was 403.6 per 100,000 population in 2010. England and Wales’ violent crime RATE was 4079.7 per 100,000 ADULTS in 2010.

    I am thankful that we have guns and have had violent times, so that we can be free.
    brocktice likes this.

  11. #131
    Distinguished Member Array zamboni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    North of the Line
    Posts
    1,216
    It seems that when the anti's start including statistic on gun violence, gun killings, gun shootings, etc. They link them all in together as one total number.

    There are several sub-tistics to consider. Justifiable shootings, those crime related by criminals only who were also committing a crime by simply HAVING a gun in their possession, and the those by LEO doing their job protecting their communities inline of their duty.

    It isn't just one number, there are too many variables to consider as well.

    Also, if you look long enough, and dig deep enough; statistics will say what-ever you want them to interpret towards avenging your personal case, personal cause, and will effectively support your essays topics of choice.

  12. #132
    New Member Array bhzrdtat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    jacksonville, fl
    Posts
    1

    I can agree with more guns per capita can increase gun related deaths.

    The chart originally posted, brings forth many questions.
    1. Are the guns being counted legal or illegally possessed weapons, doubtful they were able to count these weapons.
    2. Two, the US is in a unique situation, gun control being prominent in such places as LA and Chicago have a vastly different gun control than say places in Utah etc., and these seem to be where majority of gun crimes are commited, or "Gun free zones" as many call them.

    I would take this argument with a grain of salt, as other countries are all for or have no government control to support the situations that can occur in the US. We have a unique view on armament and positions from the anti gun movement, as we have a choice. From what I can see, the chart may have a valid point, but of course can not encompass all points of information needed to make the argument valid.

  13. #133
    Distinguished Member Array BigStick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Gig Harbor, WA
    Posts
    1,455
    Quote Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
    Actually the big black gun IS the problem. If you are are a ruler or a tyrant, that is precisley the gun that you dont want the unwashed masses to own. Why? Because it can be wickedly efficient at its job.

    So you do your best to convice people that it is in their best interests to not own it. Whether you do it buy buying politicians,Presidents, buying media outlets, chanting mantras or sponsering or funding organizations that are dedicated to bringing about its demise,manipulating statistics or even convincing your local priest to preach about them at Sunday Mass...how ever you do it is irrevelent as long as it works, because in their eyes the ends justifies the means.

    Make no mistake. Its not about the guns. It never has been and it never will be. Its about CONTROL.
    You hit on the core of the problem. The other side refuses to aknowledge this as a valid reason to own guns. They keep trying to trivialize the 2A with talk of "sporting purposes" and hunting. Once again, the reason for the arguments is a fundamental dissagreement in and disconect in what we are argueing. It is hard to decide who wins when you are playing different games by different rules.
    Walk softly ...

  14. #134
    Member Array dugo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    192
    Brocktice, with all due respect, your post (#114), above, seems to be a continuation of the "lawyeristic" rationalization I alluded to, that often obscures understanding rather than enhancing it. It kind of restates what you already said without moving forward, and I don't think it would help things to respond further.

    Below, Hotguns says, "Everything else is semantics." While I would caution that semantics has real and often intentionally prejudicial effects on thinking, I think hshe is mostly right.

    Hotguns' post looks like a good place to start in getting a better understanding of the purposes and effects of firearms on/in society. I would not be offended if you read my post over again a little more slowly, also.

  15. #135
    Distinguished Member Array brocktice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    1,277

    Re: More guns, more gun deaths

    Quote Originally Posted by dugo View Post
    Hotguns' post looks like a good place to start in getting a better understanding of the purposes and effects of firearms on/in society. I would not be offended if you read my post over again a little more slowly, also.
    I understand all of that. I've thought about it quite a bit. It's just a different level of discussion and sophistication than was relevant to my point, but whatever, I'll sleep on it and see if there's some way to rescue that portion of the conversation tomorrow. The funny thing is, now that I think about it and re-read, that I think the problem is really what we each mean by 'primary'. As I see it tonight, it's just totally orthogonal to the original purpose of the thread.

Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 567891011 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

book more guns more gun deaths

,

deaths from guns by country and per capita

,
powered by mybb british industrial revolution
,
powered by mybb dead people
,
powered by mybb drug detection times
,
powered by mybb drug list
,
powered by mybb find drug information
,

powered by mybb legitimate home based business

,

powered by mybb michigan state

,

powered by mybb noun

,

powered by mybb side effects of illegal drugs

,
powered by mybb who invented medicine
Click on a term to search for related topics.