Need help with Argument - Page 2

Need help with Argument

This is a discussion on Need help with Argument within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; When I said that a violent offender should be severely punished, his remark was something like, "why, you can't be sure he will ever do ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Need help with Argument

  1. #16
    Senior Member Array Double Naught Spy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    When I said that a violent offender should be severely punished, his remark was something like, "why, you can't be sure he will ever do this again".
    He is right. You can't be sure the offender will ever commit it again. Then again, you are NOT punishing the offender for future crimes anyway. You punish for the crime for which the offender was convicted.

    I am not sure by your statements if you are arguing that violent offenders need to be punished more severely because they are likely to be repeat offenders, but if so, then you are in error. You cannot punish for what you believe will happen in the future.

    With that said, I don't believe in cutting slack for folks simply because they are a first time offender.

  2. #17
    Distinguished Member Array 4my sons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Out side of Richmond, VA
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulG View Post
    He is a real paradox. He is really a caring and giving person. He has proven that he will give the shirt off his back to help people in need. So I am just as confused with his beliefs and he is with mine.

    I'm no psych Dr, but almost sounds like he is lonely and looking for attention, I guess kind of like the kid that dumps his bowl of cereal in the floor to get a reaction out of mommy. It's not the substance of the argument, but rather the fact that your attention is focused on him. Maybe ask him what flavor ice cream he likes, then tell him that that flavor sucks, and (pick any other) tell him that XXXXX is the only real flavor.

    FWIW, just a thought.
    "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [Warren v. District of Columbia,(D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)]
    If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Another sheeple argument
    By Jameso in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: October 8th, 2009, 06:21 PM
  2. Argument and a list
    By kbuck1984 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: December 14th, 2008, 05:27 PM
  3. Help me out with argument!
    By Chemistry08 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: December 5th, 2008, 02:24 PM
  4. It started an argument..
    By monky in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: January 31st, 2008, 06:11 PM
  5. Here is the old argument?
    By scott Laird in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: September 8th, 2006, 11:02 PM