Feinsteins proposed 2013 AWB - Page 6

Feinsteins proposed 2013 AWB

This is a discussion on Feinsteins proposed 2013 AWB within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Beeatch!!! Oh sorry couldnt contain myself....

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 104
Like Tree78Likes

Thread: Feinsteins proposed 2013 AWB

  1. #76
    VIP Member Array sixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    indiana usa
    Posts
    2,563
    Beeatch!!! Oh sorry couldnt contain myself.


  2. #77
    Senior Member Array wishyouwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The United Databases of America
    Posts
    626

  3. #78
    Sponsor
    Array SHTFGearLLC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,137
    Quote Originally Posted by Bark'n View Post
    Warning...

    We are serous about no discussion of illegal activities! The offending post has been edited. Several other posts have been deleted as they were responding to the post made about discussing an illegal activity.

    I apologize for not catching it sooner.
    Thank you

  4. #79
    Member Array randian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    201
    The lies are coming fast from Feinstein. From the summary page:

    Jeffrey Roth and Christopher Koper find that the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban was responsible for a 6.7 percent decrease in total gun murders

    Since "assault weapons" are not used in 6.7% of gun murders, how can banning them possibly be responsible for a 6.7% decrease in gun murders?

    reporters David Fallis and James Grimaldi write that the percentage of firearms seized by police in Virginia with high-capacity magazines dropped significantly during the Assault Weapons Ban. That figure has doubled since the ban expired.

    It's probably true that more people have such magazines now that they're legal. What on earth does that have to do with gun murders?

  5. #80
    Member Array randian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    201
    I'd bet that "suppressor mount" is one of the military characteristics. That makes this a back-door suppressor ban too. You can still buy the suppressor, but what's the point if manufacturing a gun you can mount it on is illegal?

  6. #81
    Member Array Kmcg1525's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    79
    Crazy thing about the registration idea of her's, legally criminals do not have to due to their 5th amendment rights. FindLaw | Cases and Codes

  7. #82
    Distinguished Member Array Once's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    1,629
    Wait until she tries to attach it to the fiscal cliff bill

  8. #83
    Senior Member Array rednichols's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by peckman28 View Post
    Wow. She needs to be thrown out of office for failing to uphold her oath. Seriously.
    Indeed she is the most-antigun politician in America; and sitting for office as she does in the liberal North of California, she seems to be welded in place.

    Our only hope is that NRA, and aligned (thinking) politicians will continue to throw their weight behind regulating the real cause of these shootings, which is the creation of a group of young sociopaths (look it up, esp. narcissism) who have been created by violent gaming and violent films (Jack Reacher features just such a mass shooting by a seeming sociopath, who turns out to be a psychopath). Personally I can't watch these sorts of films (I read the book, well before Childs [not his real name] came to notoriety), and indeed have had to walk out of many; e.g., Starship Troopers and Boogie Nights, because of the explicit violence.

    By the way, Childs writes about a fictional America; this from Wikipedia: "Jim Grant (born 1954), better known by his pen name Lee Child, is a British thriller writer." In that way, he's reaching across the Pond and wreaking havoc in our country, from the relative safety of his own country. That's a problem, in my view.
    Red (Richard) Nichols
    "Chief Holster Scientist"

    http://www.highnoonholsters.com/Red_.../about_us.html

  9. #84
    VIP Member Array Doghandler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Branch
    Posts
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Maximpactguns View Post
    Why aren't we taking this administration by storm? Are people afraid to fight for their freedoms maybe literally?
    You have a plan? Is now the time?

    For me personally it's a choice between spontaneous combustion or self immolation but who cares about a melodramatic poet.

    Just don't get me started on HotGun's burning stake.

  10. #85
    Distinguished Member Array sniper58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,631
    ONE military characteristic? Like a barrel, sights, trigger, slide lock, extractor, magazine well or any other part? Yeah, OKAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Robsmack likes this.
    Tim
    BE PREPARED - Noah didn't build the Ark when it was raining!
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    ________
    NRA Life Member

  11. #86
    VIP Member Array Doghandler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Branch
    Posts
    2,315

    Re: Feinsteins proposed 2013 AWB

    Like the power of Congress to make war? Yawn...

    ...
    Of all the absurd things I have ever written I like this one the most.
    There is a solution but we are not Jedi... not yet.
    Doghandler

  12. #87
    VIP Member Array Eagleks's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    7,874
    Remember "ONE" thing too, which Feinstien and the others haven't considered....... the only thing on an AR that requires a NICS check is the lower. A lot of folks own lowers, and nothing else. So, if someone sent in a picture or register it, it would only need to be the lower. There is no restriction or NICS check required on any other part of an AR .... nor illegal to own... nor that has a serial number nor requires a NICS check.

    I'm not advocating anything ..... other than fighting thru our representatives a total rejection of any bill to ban, confiscate, or create a registration of any of them...... e.g. Feinstien and Schumer type bills should be rejected.

    But, I can imagine there would be a lot of garage machinist and composite folks out there, that would soon be able to market one in no time within their state. Why would that be relevant..... some states DO have laws .... protecting anyone within that state of producing / manufacturing guns within the state that are made, sold and used within the boundaries of their states..... and consequently rejecting that they are subject to any federal control ..... as they do not fit the commerce clause. And in those laws include , that parts used in the guns do not all have to be made within the state itself and would not be subject to the Federal regulations. So, I think there would be a real challenge in the courts if someone used a lower, manufactured within such a state, that it was NOT subject to the Federal regulations.

    I believe Utah and Montana, both have those laws..... not sure what other states do. In our state, they have been considering such a bill .... and with the results of the November elections in our State, it would have an even higher chance of passing now.

    So, besides the 2nd Amendment challenge, and the basis of Heller "they cannot prohibit guns commonly used by the public", there are those states who say they will exercise the 10th Amendment as well .... when guns are manufactured, assembled, sold and used within the borders of their states.
    I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --- Will Rogers ---
    Chief Justice John Roberts : "I don't see how you can read Heller and not take away from it the notion that the Second Amendment...was extremely important to the framers in their view of what liberty meant."

  13. #88
    Distinguished Member
    Array accessbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,438
    Here's one for you -

    James Madison, in the Federalist Papers (#46): "To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it."
    peckman28 likes this.
    EDC - Glock 21C, M&P Shield .40 OR Ruger SR1911 CMD AND
    Ruger LCP in Desantis Pocket Holster (backup)
    Member - SAF, OFF,
    NRA Life Member

  14. #89
    Member Array Samwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Carolina, First to Secede
    Posts
    208
    I wonder if the bill contains a provision that will require gun owners to wear a yellow star with the words "gun owner" or will it just require a number be tattooed on our arms? </ sarcasm>
    Last edited by Samwolf; December 29th, 2012 at 03:07 PM.
    Samwolf

    "One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms."

    -- Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 1840

  15. #90
    Ex Member Array Doodle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Tomball TX
    Posts
    948
    I hope Texas does not stand for this, if it passes.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

120 guns on feinsteins list
,
120 named firearms list
,
120 specifically named firearms list
,
120 specifically-named firearms
,
120 specifically-named firearms list
,

2013 awb

,

2013 awb list

,
2013 awb proposal
,

awb 2013

,
list of 120 specifically-named firearms
,
what are the 120 named firearms
,

what are the 120 specifically-named firearms

Click on a term to search for related topics.