Your future is what you make it, or by inaction, allow it to become.
It seems to me that if an establishment denies me the right to protect myself in order to use an establishment open to the public, the establishment is accepting the responsibility for protecting me from injury due to a possible criminal attack. If I were to be injured by a criminal attack that I might have been able to resist if armed, then I should be able to sue the establishment for not protecting me. With people bringing suit for all manner of trivial matters why is this approach not being used to go after the theaters and malls that deny firearms but provide no other effective security?
I predict if we eliminate gun free zones the mass murders will end.We allowed teachers and professors to arm themselves we
haven't had a school shooting in a while.