I am not advocating ANY measure proposed by the Feinsteins as "reasonable restrictions"; what I AM saying is that reasonable restrictions are already in place, as set out in the Supreme Court's decisions (Haller and MacDonald; if you haven't read at least Haller, do so!) where sawed-off shotguns have been restricted for a very long time; perhaps longer than some posters on this forum have been living. What I AM saying is that the "reasonable restrictions" matter has already been decided, and should reasonably applied to every part of the Constitution, and that includes the rest of the Amendments, including the First.
The 2nd amendment does not call for nor allows so called "reasonable restrictions(infringements)". Yes the Supreme Court has ruled otherwise and they are wrong and know it.