NRA-ILA Too Quiet?

This is a discussion on NRA-ILA Too Quiet? within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; While I agree that the NRA-ILA is indeed a strong force on Capitol Hill, my logical mind tells me they are at a minimum not ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 16 of 16
Like Tree14Likes

Thread: NRA-ILA Too Quiet?

  1. #16
    Distinguished Member Array RightsEroding's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    While I agree that the NRA-ILA is indeed a strong force on Capitol Hill, my logical mind tells me they are at a minimum not doing enough and at worst, possibly making a grave error fighting a *new* war with old weapons and strategy.

    The ILA doesn't exist to wave the flag or go on public opinion escapades.
    Public opinion "escapades" is precisely what gets officials elected. Sad; but still true.
    Garnering public opinion is probably exactly what they need to be doing today.

    The ILA was formed in 1975; the atmosphere is far different in 2013. I sincerely hope I am wrong, but even our best military
    minds realize, as the nature of war changes, so must our battlefield strategy if we desire to win the day. Make no mistake, this current onslaught to the 2nd amendment (and other rights) by elected officials who no longer do the peoples bidding, coupled with deep media bias is a *New* type of warfare that was unknown in 1975 or even 2004 for that matter.

    It is nearly impossible to win "the hearts & minds" of the people, when the people are denied the truth.
    The truth is bought & paid for in the media by people who have unlimited resources to spew whatever they wish to advance any agenda
    that satisfies their desires; what ever they may be.

    I maintain, the NRA-ILA needs to win the "hearts & minds" of the American people through means far beyond the confines of Capitol Hill.

    Writing letters is great. Talking to neighbors etc is great. Grass roots movements in this current culture may garner minimal attention for a period; yet is now ineffective in the long term.

    From the ILA's web page:

    In 1986, the NRA and millions of gun owners nationwide applauded as the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan.
    President Reagan is no longer in office. We have the opposite in office. It's a *new* game with *new* rules.

    Resting on past laurels is dangerous.

    When restrictive “gun control” legislation is proposed at the local, state or federal level, NRA members and supporters are alerted and respond with individual letters, faxes, e-mails and calls to their elected representatives to make their views known.
    No longer enough.

    FOX News, presumably a conservative media outlet and claiming a larger viewership than other liberal networks combined, could and should run ads by the NRA to reach more Americans with the truth..NOT just gun owners. Perhaps FOX would give the NRA a rate discount if they (FOX) believe in this fight.

    4 million NRA members. I have no idea what the NRA's war chest looks like; perhaps it is financially not feasible... but I believe it would be money well spent.

    Yep. This is only my opinion. I hope I am wrong, but something tells me I am not when I look around and see how battles and wars are won in this period of history.
    Crowman likes this.
    "When those who are governed do too little, those who govern can, and will, do too much." Ronald Reagan

    Do what you can; then do what you must

  2. Remove Ads

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search tags for this page

are new gun laws gonna pass forum nra
ila treasure porn
nra gets quiet
nra hearts and minds

nra ila

nra too silent on
Click on a term to search for related topics.