Ridiculous Arguments for Gun-Control
This is a discussion on Ridiculous Arguments for Gun-Control within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by pittypat21
Over the past couple days I've had to argue with some pretty opinionated and ill-informed individuals about gun-control. I've heard, and ...
January 8th, 2013 04:46 PM
I like these arguments if they are good natured with no yelling and such. They usually come from people who have no real knowledge or very little. I have included a few points of my own.
Originally Posted by pittypat21
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.
January 8th, 2013 07:14 PM
Re: Ridiculous Arguments for Gun-Control
Those rebuttals are fine.. But, the quote from the Japanese officer is bogus. To a good anti, this negates all of your arguments.
Originally Posted by cmdrdredd
You must be prepared, with an anti, to make both factual, and emotional arguments. And your FACTS must be irrefutable, your emotional arguments based in fact.
It could be worse!
January 9th, 2013 12:38 AM
You are right, however, the quote from Yamamoto is actually quite factual.
Search tags for this page
abraham lincoln gun control
arguments for gun control
gun control arguments
gun control musket argument
gun control ridiculous
refuting anti gun control arguments
ridiculous arguments about gun control
ridiculous arguments for gun control
ridiculous gun control arguments
ridiculous gun laws
stevens barrel shroud
Click on a term to search for related topics.