Hey Connecticut = Only Flintlock Rifles in your future

Hey Connecticut = Only Flintlock Rifles in your future

This is a discussion on Hey Connecticut = Only Flintlock Rifles in your future within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 122 January Session, 2013 LCO No. 543 Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by: SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist. AN ACT ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
Like Tree16Likes

Thread: Hey Connecticut = Only Flintlock Rifles in your future

  1. #1
    VIP Member
    Array ANGLICO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    I'm the guy next door that is polite, but does not tell you crap.
    Posts
    3,972

    Hey Connecticut = Only Flintlock Rifles in your future

    General Assembly
    Proposed Bill No. 122

    January Session, 2013
    LCO No. 543


    Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY

    Introduced by:

    SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist.

    AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

    That the general statutes be amended to establish a class C felony offense, except for certain military and law enforcement personnel and certain gun clubs, for (1) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate, transport, possess or use any gun except one made to fire a single round, (2) any person to fire a gun containing more than a single round, (3) any person or organization to receive from another state, territory or country a gun made to fire multiple rounds, or (4) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate or possess a magazine or clip capable of holding more than one round.


    AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.
    Socialism Kills! Time proven, with a very large body count! We are a Constitutional Republic....... not a Democracy, get it correct!

    Don't be mistaken for a Gecko45: http://lonelymachines.org/mall-ninjas/

    Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14qTdp-Dd30

    ANGLICO Images


  2. #2
    Distinguished Member Array Exacto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,630
    So, the good guys will have a muzzle loader and the bad guys will have whatever they want........... Good luck with that.
    Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunder bolt...... Sun Tzu.

    The supreme art of war is to defeat the enemy without fighting........ Sun Tzu.

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array xXxplosive's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,839
    And the "Freak Show" continues.................

  4. #4
    VIP Member
    Array msgt/ret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,767
    Statement of Purpose:

    To reduce the use of guns for criminal purposes.
    As if a criminal would care what the law said.
    Rawah and ErnieNWillis like this.
    When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
    "Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."

  5. #5
    Member Array Harvester's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    90
    This is ridiculous... it’s like these clowns are trying to outdo each other on how silly they can make new laws.
    Last edited by Harvester; January 11th, 2013 at 01:46 PM. Reason: Because I can!!
    TX expat and Bark'n like this.
    Molon Labe

  6. #6
    VIP Member
    Array Hopyard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Disappeared
    Posts
    12,110
    Quote Originally Posted by ANGLICO View Post
    General Assembly
    Proposed Bill No. 122

    January Session, 2013
    LCO No. 543


    Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY

    Introduced by:

    SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist.

    AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

    That the general statutes be amended to establish a class C felony offense, except for certain military and law enforcement personnel and certain gun clubs, for (1) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate, transport, possess or use any gun except one made to fire a single round, .[/url]

    Re: Part in bold: So, vindication for my bad judgment. Apparently keeping my Remington Target Master was pretty wise.

    That won't go anywhere I hope. It would be the same as confiscation and there are way too many CT gun owners who don't
    live in Greenwich or Hartford who would be pretty upset.
    If the Union is once severed, the line of separation will grow wider and wider, and the controversies which are now debated and settled in the halls of legislation will then be tried in fields of battle and determined by the sword.
    Andrew Jackson

  7. #7
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,919
    But, I see a real problem with that. WHAT IF somebody had 11 flintlock rifles and quickly fired them one right after another???

    Wouldn't that be almost the same as having ONE gun with a magazine capacity of over 10 rounds???

    I say limit ONE flintlock rifle per household.

    Maybe I shouldn't give the childish brain dead idiots any fresh ideas.
    TX expat and eeeZnow like this.
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

  8. #8
    VIP Member
    Array RoadRunner71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    6,474
    I started to chuckle when I read that. I was thinking how ludicrous it sounded.

    Then I started to get scared. Laugh all you want. I'm going to keep an eye on this one.
    If you have never broken your gun or bled on your gun in training, you're doing it wrong!
    Train hard, live easy.

  9. #9
    Distinguished Member
    Array whoppo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    1,385
    ... with the full support of Deputy Barney Fife.
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    The Second Amendment *IS* Homeland Security
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------- Μολὼν λαβέ ----------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array DocT65's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    596
    Flintlock??? Don't you mean slingshot?
    "Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6"

    Flight Surgeon, USAF
    Law Enforcement Tactical Surgeon

    NRA Patron Member

  11. #11
    Distinguished Member Array ErnieNWillis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Willis, TX
    Posts
    1,230
    Anyone tired of this crap yet? Do you feel like you are being harassed?

  12. #12
    Distinguished Member Array dben002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Kernersville NC
    Posts
    1,388
    Would it be mandatory to carry your single round in your left front shirt pocket ?? would that be considered concealed ?
    There are two types of people who carry concealed weapons...Responsible ones and Irresponsible ones...which are you...

  13. #13
    Member Array CrowJS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Mathiston MS
    Posts
    135
    Don't laugh too much. Somebody is going to take this seriously. I think this is exactly what Sen Feinstein would like to see.

  14. #14
    VIP Member
    Array Rob99VMI04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NOVA...200 square miles surrounded by reality
    Posts
    3,568
    They are just throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks.
    “Are you a thermometer or a thermostat, do you reflect or become what is happening in the room or do you change the atmosphere, reset the temperature when you come into the room”?--Chuck Swindoll

    Its not about guns...Its about Freedom!

  15. #15
    Member Array Coltman 77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    406
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob99VMI04 View Post
    They are just throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks.
    Great point Rob.

    Run it up the flagpole...

    I think the colonists probably thought that their muskets were cutting edge technology about 250 yrs ago.

    Today AR 15's are our muskets. YMMV.
    "Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, you should never wish to do less".
    General Robert E. Lee

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

2nd amendment flintlock vs now
,
connecticut proposed gun law in 2013 bill 122
,
connecticut proposed senate bill 122 restrictions guns
,
ct ar 15 laws
,
ct sen meyer gun
,
flintlock guns connecticut
,
flintlock rifle connecticut
,
general assembly proposed bill no. 122
,
illinois flintlock rifle makers
,

proposed bill no. 122

,

sb 1066 rifle connecticut

,
where can i buy an ar15 in ct 2013
Click on a term to search for related topics.