Hey Connecticut = Only Flintlock Rifles in your future

[ANGLICO]

General Assembly
Proposed Bill No. 122

January Session, 2013
LCO No. 543


Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY

Introduced by:

SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist.

AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That the general statutes be amended to establish a class C felony offense, except for certain military and law enforcement personnel and certain gun clubs, for (1) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate, transport, possess or use any gun except one made to fire a single round, (2) any person to fire a gun containing more than a single round, (3) any person or organization to receive from another state, territory or country a gun made to fire multiple rounds, or (4) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate or possess a magazine or clip capable of holding more than one round.


AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

[DefensiveCarry.com]

[Exacto]

So, the good guys will have a muzzle loader and the bad guys will have whatever they want........... Good luck with that.

[xXxplosive]

And the "Freak Show" continues.................

[msgt/ret]

Statement of Purpose:

To reduce the use of guns for criminal purposes.

As if a criminal would care what the law said.

[Harvester]

This is ridiculous... it’s like these clowns are trying to outdo each other on how silly they can make new laws.

[Hopyard]

General Assembly
Proposed Bill No. 122

January Session, 2013
LCO No. 543


Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY

Introduced by:

SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist.

AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That the general statutes be amended to establish a class C felony offense, except for certain military and law enforcement personnel and certain gun clubs, for (1) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate, transport, possess or use any gun except one made to fire a single round, .[/url]

Re: Part in bold: So, vindication for my bad judgment. Apparently keeping my Remington Target Master was pretty wise.

That won't go anywhere I hope. It would be the same as confiscation and there are way too many CT gun owners who don't
live in Greenwich or Hartford who would be pretty upset.

[QKShooter]

But, I see a real problem with that. WHAT IF somebody had 11 flintlock rifles and quickly fired them one right after another???

Wouldn't that be almost the same as having ONE gun with a magazine capacity of over 10 rounds???

I say limit ONE flintlock rifle per household.

Maybe I shouldn't give the childish brain dead idiots any fresh ideas.

[RoadRunner71]

I started to chuckle when I read that. I was thinking how ludicrous it sounded.

Then I started to get scared. Laugh all you want. I'm going to keep an eye on this one.

[whoppo]

... with the full support of Deputy Barney Fife.

[DocT65]

Flintlock??? Don't you mean slingshot?

[ErnieNWillis]

Anyone tired of this crap yet? Do you feel like you are being harassed?

[dben002]

Would it be mandatory to carry your single round in your left front shirt pocket ?? would that be considered concealed ?

[CrowJS]

Don't laugh too much. Somebody is going to take this seriously. I think this is exactly what Sen Feinstein would like to see.

[Rob99VMI04]

They are just throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks.

[Coltman 77]

They are just throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks.

Great point Rob.

Run it up the flagpole...

I think the colonists probably thought that their muskets were cutting edge technology about 250 yrs ago.

Today AR 15's are our muskets. YMMV.