The Truth About "Assault" Weapons
This is a discussion on The Truth About "Assault" Weapons within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Prior to 1989, the term "assault weapon" did not exist in the lexicon of firearms. It is a political term, developed by anti-gun publicists to ...
Post By Crowman
Post By tdw63
January 14th, 2013 01:27 AM
The Truth About "Assault" Weapons
Prior to 1989, the term "assault weapon" did not exist in the lexicon of firearms. It is a political term, developed by anti-gun publicists to expand the category of "assault rifles"...
Handgun restriction is simply not viewed as a priority. Assault weapons...are the topic. The weapons' menacing looks, coupled with the public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.
The Truth About Assault Weapons
Last edited by Crowman; January 14th, 2013 at 02:36 AM.
"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation."
--Thomas B. Reed, American Attorney
Second Amendment -- Established December 15, 1791
and slowly eroded ever since What happened to "..... shall not be infringed."
January 14th, 2013 01:43 AM
Great format very informative.
January 14th, 2013 01:52 AM
Any AWB attempt is a precursor to banning all semi-automatic weapons including handguns.
According to Senator Feinstein, so-called assault weapons have been used in 385 murders since the AWB expired in 2004, or about 48 murders per year.
But there were 8,583 total murders with guns in the United States in 2011, meaning so-called assault weapons were used 0.6% of the time.
This represents a decrease in murders from so-called assault weapons compared to the decade when the AWB was in effect, even though such weapons are more common today.
The word is getting out.
Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting a citizen to repel force by force
when the intervention of society... may be too late to prevent an injury.
-Blackstone’s Commentaries 145–146, n. 42 (1803) in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
January 14th, 2013 11:59 AM
Very well done...
At Virginia Tech in 2007, Seung-Hui Cho once again showed the futility of regulating magazine capacity when he carried nineteen ten- and fifteen-round magazines in his backpack as part of a carefully planned massacre.
Cho used seventeen of the magazines and fired approximately 170 rounds—or ten rounds per magazine—from two handguns before killing himself.
Like Eric Harris before him, Cho demonstrated that a magazine's capacity was incidental to the amount of death and destruction an unopposed murderer could cause in a "gun-free zone".
It could be worse!
January 14th, 2013 12:15 PM
Thanks for posting. Very well done and easy to follow, especially for those who know little to nothing about firearms. I will be passing it around to many so-called intellectuals.
January 14th, 2013 12:31 PM
Thanks for posting, that was a great read!
January 14th, 2013 12:41 PM
Looks good. Not sure an anti would read through the whole thing, though.
Search tags for this page
1922 amendment on firearms
assault weapons are realt not
handgun restriction is simply not viewed as a priority
murders by assault guns united states
the truth about assault
the truth about assault weapons
the truth about assault weapons share on facebook
the truth about assualt weapons
tom reed and assault weapon legislation
truth about assault weapons
Click on a term to search for related topics.