Is the Dick Act of 1902 One of Our Safeguards....

This is a discussion on Is the Dick Act of 1902 One of Our Safeguards.... within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I would like to hear your thoughts on this Act...... "With over 300 Million guns in the United States, the federal CORPORATE government (federal gov’t ...

Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By dukalmighty
  • 1 Post By steffen
  • 1 Post By AngryBadger417

Thread: Is the Dick Act of 1902 One of Our Safeguards....

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array Crowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West Allis WI
    Posts
    2,761

    Question Is the Dick Act of 1902 One of Our Safeguards....

    I would like to hear your thoughts on this Act......

    "With over 300 Million guns in the United States, the federal CORPORATE government (federal gov’t defined as corporation under 28 U.S.C. Section 3002 (15) and the states are subdivisions of the corporation, 28 U.S.C. Section 3002 (10), cannot ban arms or stop people from defending themselves against a tyrannical government."
    Dick Act of 1902 Is One of Our Safeguards | Peace . Gold . Liberty
    "One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation."
    --Thomas B. Reed, American Attorney

    Second Amendment -- Established December 15, 1791 and slowly eroded ever since What happened to "..... shall not be infringed."

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Member Array TheConcealer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    315
    Seems as though it should be, but from the way King Obama works, and the way the libs think, they couldn't give a rat's BOOTY about any precedent or law that stands in their way.

    I mean heck, Bama doesn't even feel restrained by the Constitution, why should the Dick Act from "way back in 1902" matter?
    Living a life free from fear, means being able to protect it at all times.
    Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
    NRA

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array dukalmighty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    15,179
    M16/M4's and ammo for everybody that wants one
    WINTEJER000 and Bark'n like this.
    "Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country,"
    --Mayor Marion Barry, Washington , DC .

  5. #4
    Member Array steffen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    396
    Ask your local Sheriff. He can overrule the Obamanator.
    WINTEJER000 likes this.
    The problem with gun control is that drugs are already illegal.

  6. #5
    Member Array AngryBadger417's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Good ole West Virginia
    Posts
    322
    Quote Originally Posted by dukalmighty View Post
    M16/M4's and ammo for everybody that wants one

    I like the sound of that!
    WINTEJER000 likes this.

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array Richard58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Charlotte area of North Carolina
    Posts
    2,060
    They r wanting to change the Laws as they proceed to fit their agenda.
    The police are not there to protect you from crime, they are there to arrest the guy after the crime has been committed, assuming they find him. It is your responsibility to protect yourself and your family.

  8. #7
    Member Array WINTEJER000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Spokane, Wa, USA
    Posts
    316
    Interesting read but i doubt it they will listen to it
    “But now,” he said, “take your money and a traveler’s bag. And if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one!” Luke 22:36 (NLT)

  9. #8
    Moderator
    Array Bark'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    West Central Missouri
    Posts
    9,917
    Sounds interesting. I'm curious as to why the NRA or GOA isn't intimately familiar with it? I've never heard of the Dick Act mentioned by any of those organizations.

    I'll have to look into it a little deeper. I find it interesting that it can not be repealed. If true, that should give it some teeth, and I would think the NRA would be shouting it at the top of their lungs.
    -Bark'n
    Semper Fi


    "The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."

  10. #9
    VIP Member
    Array Echo_Four's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Land of the mostly free
    Posts
    2,829
    My thought is that people that don't understand the law ought not to write articles about it.

    Any Act can be repealed at any time. It does not violate any "bills of attainder and ex post facto laws" as the author suggested. To repeal all one would have to do is include in the ban that any provision of any prior legislation that conflicts with the bill is repealed. That doesn't make a criminal out of anyone. It doesn't make anything that you did yesterday illegal yesterday. It deals with what you can do from this moment forward. Even under their best scenario this isn't how we win. If they say that the 2nd Amendment applies only to the National Guard and that private ownership of firearms is no longer legal that means that from the date forward you cannot own them. It doesn't make you a criminal because you did own them. It means that you turn the gun in now or you are a criminal.

    Nice try, but I should have known better than to bother reading it once I saw what website it came from.
    "The only people I like besides my wife and children are Marines."
    - Lt. Col. Oliver North

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

2d amendment 1902
,

dickact1902

Click on a term to search for related topics.