Great link, thanks for posting.
This is a discussion on Lott on Guns in the WSJ within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; John R. Lott, Jr. in the WSJ: John Lott: The Facts About Assault Weapons and Crime - WSJ.com Ms. Feinstein points to two studies by ...
John R. Lott, Jr. in the WSJ:
John Lott: The Facts About Assault Weapons and Crime - WSJ.com
Ms. Feinstein points to two studies by criminology professors Chris Koper and Jeff Roth for the National Institute of Justice to back up her contention that the ban reduced crime. She claims that their first study in 1997 showed that the ban decreased "total gun murders." In fact, the authors wrote: "the evidence is not strong enough for us to conclude that there was any meaningful effect (i.e., that the effect was different from zero)."
Messrs. Koper and Roth suggested that after the ban had been in effect for more years it might be possible to find a benefit. Seven years later, in 2004, they published a follow-up study for the National Institute of Justice with fellow criminologist Dan Woods that concluded, "we cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation's recent drop in gun violence. And, indeed, there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence."If we finally want to deal seriously with multiple-victim public shootings, it's time that we acknowledge a common feature of these attacks: With just a single exception, the attack in Tucson last year, every public shooting in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed since at least 1950 has occurred in a place where citizens are not allowed to carry their own firearms. Had some citizens been armed, they might have been able to stop the killings before the police got to the scene. In the Newtown attack, it took police 20 minutes to arrive at the school after the first calls for help.
"He went on two legs, wore clothes and was a human being, but nevertheless he was in reality a wolf of the Steppes. He had learned a good deal . . . and was a fairly clever fellow. What he had not learned, however, was this: to find contentment in himself and his own life. The cause of this apparently was that at the bottom of his heart he knew all the time (or thought he knew) that he was in reality not a man, but a wolf of the Steppes."
Great link, thanks for posting.
NRA Life Member
Libtards don't care about facts...just their agenda.
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
He makes a rational argument, which means it will be completely ignored.
The problem with anti's is that if a study even suggests/hints at the thought that banning anything to do with guns works, any information that follows will be quickly dismissed as propaganda from someone with an agenda.
I would rather die with good men than hide with cowards
If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy."
M&Pc .357sig, 2340Sigpro .357sig