Post By Rock and Glock
January 19th, 2013 11:26 PM
Lott on Guns in the WSJ
John R. Lott, Jr. in the WSJ:
John Lott: The Facts About Assault Weapons and Crime - WSJ.com
Ms. Feinstein points to two studies by criminology professors Chris Koper and Jeff Roth for the National Institute of Justice to back up her contention that the ban reduced crime. She claims that their first study in 1997 showed that the ban decreased "total gun murders." In fact, the authors wrote: "the evidence is not strong enough for us to conclude that there was any meaningful effect (i.e., that the effect was different from zero)."
Messrs. Koper and Roth suggested that after the ban had been in effect for more years it might be possible to find a benefit. Seven years later, in 2004, they published a follow-up study for the National Institute of Justice with fellow criminologist Dan Woods that concluded, "we cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation's recent drop in gun violence. And, indeed, there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence."
If we finally want to deal seriously with multiple-victim public shootings, it's time that we acknowledge a common feature of these attacks: With just a single exception, the attack in Tucson last year, every public shooting in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed since at least 1950 has occurred in a place where citizens are not allowed to carry their own firearms. Had some citizens been armed, they might have been able to stop the killings before the police got to the scene. In the Newtown attack, it took police 20 minutes to arrive at the school after the first calls for help.
January 19th, 2013 11:37 PM
Great link, thanks for posting.
January 20th, 2013 01:38 AM
Libtards don't care about facts...just their agenda.
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.
January 20th, 2013 02:13 AM
He makes a rational argument, which means it will be completely ignored.
January 20th, 2013 11:16 AM
The problem with anti's is that if a study even suggests/hints at the thought that banning anything to do with guns works, any information that follows will be quickly dismissed as propaganda from someone with an agenda.
If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.
Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British, He shot them!
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy." -- Ernest Benn
January 20th, 2013 11:28 AM
Great post! Thanks for the link!
Search tags for this page
dan wood national institute we can't clear credit the weapons ban for 2004
with just a single exception jott lott jr
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors