This is a discussion on Gun liability insurance- optional, mandatory, pros and cons? within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by Frogman Are the criminals going to be required to carry this insurance too?? Oh, sure. Find 'em all, track 'em down, force ...
The only winner is the rip off insurance companies.
NO Salt,Alcohol, Smoking,Caffeine,Chocolate,Meat,Anything Spicy,Gasoline,Weapons Except Stun Wands By Police,Contact Sports,Sex Other Than Virtual,Abortion,pregnancy Without A License,Non Educational Toys,Bad Language,Exchanging Bodily fluids Including Kissing,Aggressive Acts,Freedom Of Speech
JMHO but Insurance should be a individual thing!
With that said, I do have NRA insurance for both my instructor biz and my conceal carry liability. I also belong to Armed Citizen Legal Defense Network. I also cover my business and personal autos, business general and professional liability which are required per my business contracts.
But again it should be your option and not a state mandate as they are trying to do in the New England region. Maybe they're trying to become more British up there and miss the kidney pies!
Sigmund Freud associates retarded sexual and emotional development not with gun ownership, but with a fear and loathing of weapons!
Er, um, yeah...
No, no, I don't think this is a great idea for all the reason you guys suggested. Not the least of which is this illusion we have that business never becomes political. Who were the next people after universities to pick up the whole debacle of the political correctness thing? Corporations! Sure, for them to embrace non-discrimination as a 'best practice' makes sense, but did they stop there? The world is mad, now, mad I tell you! And we've given up so much of our 1A rights to protect the possibility that someone might not like something that is said, even if it isn't said to them, in a different room, on a secured line, but they MIGHT just happen to 'overhear.' It's insane. Just think of how people absolutely crucify someone who is being persecuted on a PC 'violation,' never mind that it's sometimes nothing more than failing to embrace the political values of the 'pc mainstream.' Does big business come to their aid? Does it defend them when they are persecuted for nothing more than politely expressing their opinion? Almost never. Sure, real discrimination happens and should NOT be accepted or tolerated, but if you put your rights in the hands of people who either don't care about those rights, or have taken on the values of those who do not care for freedom, you are asking for a whole lot of grief. Trust me, this is a move we would deeply regret.
BillK01, thanks for the information, much appreciated.