44Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksssssshhhhhhhhhh, not so loud!Originally Posted by cmdrdredd
This is a discussion on Ammunition Background Checks within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by cmdrdredd The gun is worthless without ammo so... ssssshhhhhhhhhh, not so loud!...
Array
ssssshhhhhhhhhh, not so loud!
"I plan ahead. That way, I don't have to do anything right now!"
Array
...papers...gif to me your papers, plizz...
Array
The gun shop isn't going to ignore the cost of employees' time running the background check for a box of ammo. It costs them something to pay a clerk to run it, and that cost will be multiplied by X (profit margin) and added to the cost of a box of ammo. I for one think ammo is expensive enough already, especially lately!
Array
Whats your deal, are you a liberal spy?
More on point to your post, I believe this is already law in NY. So that's where it came from.
Living a life free from fear, means being able to protect it at all times.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
NRA
Don't know whether to laugh or cry. Looking at it from my vantage point as an old man, and thinking back on
the days when as a teen I could buy a brick of .22 ammo (and anything else in the way of ammo) at the local
hardware store, I find this whole conversation as mind bending as my iPhone, iPad, and iMac.
I don't think my poor old brain can take much more 'change' and I'm not talking politics.
"Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war."
John Adams. Second President of the United States.
Array
So the real agenda and hypocrisy of the government is both indisputable and transparent. Trying to convince any objectors using facts and logic is impossible because they are not interested in the facts, only in their agenda.
Think of it this way- how many children and entire families are killed every year due to alcohol. Where is the cry for mental health checks and registration for drinkers? Why doesn't a liquor store ask for an alcohol ID card to prove someone is a registered drinker, or do a quick background check at the register anytime somebody wants to buy a bottle of bourbon, perhaps to see if they have exceeded their govt imposed limit on how many bottles they can buy in one month?
The answer is simple. Drinking doesn't interfere with the behind the scenes govt agenda to put us under one world government ( world bank, UN troops, world court, etc). Btw I drink responsibly and don't have any problem with anyone else who does the same- just trying to show how absurd the whole gun thing is.
If the governmeny wants to be our nanny then perhaps every elected official should have a mental health check before and periodically while in office. Probably an intelligence test also. Now THAT I can get behind.
Either way no one is getting any guns, ammo or magazines I have- my rights are not afforded by government- they are inalienable.
Rant over.
Carry on :-)
Array
I've never seen a bullet kill anyone without first being loaded into a gun. Nuff said.
"The Second Amendment SHOULD be your concealed weapons permit" Ted Nugent
And it's a good thing, waiting 5 weeks to charge your battery would really suck!
NRA Life Member
"I don't believe gun owners have rights." - Sarah Brady
Reading this thread and reflecting. Does anyone else here believe that your right to self-defense is natural and that it exists regardless of the wording or interpretation of the Second Amendment? Saying that your right is "allowed" by the Constitution is an oxymoron. The reason we have a Constitution is to make sure our autonomy is not taken from us. Sadly, we seem to want to give it away.
If I've gone too far off topic, delete or move as deemed necessary. I'm here under my own volition.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." ~ P. J. O'Rourke
Array
The constitution simply reinforces the right and protects it from being taken away by laws.
Remember laws remove freedoms.
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
-Thomas Jefferson
Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.
Well, that makes two of us. I was beginning to worry with some of the comments I've come across.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." ~ P. J. O'Rourke
Oh, I dunno - there's always the taxation aspect.
Cars are registered to... ? Not catch speeders and criminals, but to tax their owners!
Smitty
NRA Endowment Member
Array
The day that checks are required to get a box of ammo, it's time for war
Array
-
Because one can always buy the individual components and make their own...and because those consitutionally protected firearms are rendered useless without them.
"Historical examination of the right to bear arms, from English antecedents to the drafting of the Second Amendment, bears proof that the right to bear arms has consistently been, and should still be, construed as an individual right." -- U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings, Re: U.S. vs Emerson (1999)
Array
They can check my ammo from the end of the gun that the ammo comes out of before I ever fill out any more forms that sadly I have to.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
