The Fight's in the Vocab.
We've all seen it. The side that is able to define the words being used is the side that will win the argument. With that in mind, it's time to redefine the arguments to better reflect what the meaning really is.
Gun-Control. Biden wants to redefine this as "Gun-safety." In reality, it's "Gun restrictions."
Assault Rifle. We all know that an "Assault Rife" is really a rifle with a round selector and as such, except for the lucky few with a class III license that may have gotten one of these, no civilian owns one. To call it what it really is, an "Assault Rifle" is a Civilian Defense Rifle.
High Capacity Magazines. No one has a clue what "Hi capacity" really is. Where's the limit? It needs to be labeled properly: Personal Defense Magazines.
Gun Lobby. Labeled properly, it's a Second Amendment Lobby.
Gun Ban. This should be linked specifically to what it is. Second Amendment Ban
Federal Assault Weapons Ban needs to be exposed for what it is, a Federal Civilian Defense Rifle Ban.
Gun Reform/Gun reform bill. No gun is being "reformed." This is a Gun-Rights Reduction bill.
Post this in every forum you're on, facebook, send it to your senators and congressmen, the NRA, etc. etc. If we stop letting those who want to reduce our right to bear arms define the argument by their use of terms, we'll make a great amount of headway in a very short time.
Before I send this out to my congressmen and post it on a few forums, I want some feedback. What do you all think about this??