Defensive Carry banner

What is Senator Feinstein's agenda??

3K views 27 replies 24 participants last post by  dV8r 
#1 ·
I think she eventually wants to outlaw most every type weapon. So in the end will be allowed to have a derringer and that's all. Only reason we would get that is so they can say we didn't take away your right to keep and bear arms.

 
See less See more
1
#4 ·
I fixed it.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad426
#3 ·
No hidden agenda, she wants to ban all guns. Ban the scary looking ones now (easier sell to the sheeple). When that is done b, ban the rest. Simple.
 
#7 ·
She wants to disarm the citizenry of the United States, yet, leave it legal for her, and her elite constituents, to remain armed. They are the only ones who are competent and deserving enough to own firearms. And, as stated above, it leads to control of the populace.
 
#8 ·
I whole-heatedly believe she is behind a bigger agenda than the bill that was proposed and shot down. You see, the anti-gun politicians (mostly liberal), and big government in general, know they have to push lightly against the public. People feel very strongly about their right to protect themselves and the 2A. They will go to great lengths to minimally get a grip on gun control - little by little.

For example: Operation Fast and Furious. What was it's agenda? According to some reliable sources: Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations - CBS News Investigates - CBS News Giving the guns to Mexican cartels was a way to ensure legislation of "Demand Letter 3"
That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or "long guns." Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.
I'm sure the current administration was very displeased when that exploded in their faces. Then came the shootings - and effort went to 100% gun control. They want you to forget the economy. Forget the fiscal cliff. Forget everything except that guns are bad. Not only do they get to push their agenda, they get to redirect the conservative attention to an unrelated, but extremely important topic while they push for other agendas in the background.

Fienstiens bill was designed to fail. It was so over the top, everyone knew it wouldn't pass. Even Harry Reid was vocally opposed. So why would they design a bill to fail? Well, now they can draft up a bill that is a compromise. They couldn't strip the country of everything they want (and don't be fooled, they want to strip all the guns from the public). So now they will make some "common sense" gun laws that only an extremist who "hates children" (like the victims of sandy hook) would oppose. Those measures, in all probability, will pass. Some republicans will concede. All the democrats will be on board.

It's scary to think that the government currently operates with such calculating deceit, but mark my words, it is the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1MoreGoodGuy
#10 ·
I whole-heatedly believe she is behind a bigger agenda than the bill that was proposed and shot down. You see, the anti-gun politicians (mostly liberal), and big government in general, know they have to push lightly against the public. People feel very strongly about their right to protect themselves and the 2A. They will go to great lengths to minimally get a grip on gun control - little by little.

For example: Operation Fast and Furious. What was it's agenda? According to some reliable sources: Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations - CBS News Investigates - CBS News Giving the guns to Mexican cartels was a way to ensure legislation of "Demand Letter 3" I'm sure the current administration was very displeased when that exploded in their faces. Then came the shootings - and effort went to 100% gun control. They want you to forget the economy. Forget the fiscal cliff. Forget everything except that guns are bad. Not only do they get to push their agenda, they get to redirect the conservative attention to an unrelated, but extremely important topic while they push for other agendas in the background.

Fienstiens bill was designed to fail. It was so over the top, everyone knew it wouldn't pass. Even Harry Reid was vocally opposed. So why would they design a bill to fail? Well, now they can draft up a bill that is a compromise. They couldn't strip the country of everything they want (and don't be fooled, they want to strip all the guns from the public). So now they will make some "common sense" gun laws that only an extremist who "hates children" (like the victims of sandy hook) would oppose. Those measures, in all probability, will pass. Some republicans will concede. All the democrats will be on board.

It's scary to think that the government currently operates with such calculating deceit, but mark my words, it is the truth.
I think you are probably right. The jewel they are looking for is Universal Registration. Once they have that, confiscation of ALL guns is easier.
 
#11 ·
Do you have any idea how many drive by bayonet attacks will be prevented by banning bayonet lugs?

Also, don't give me no sass about how you can tie a bayonet on the end of a long stick.
 
#19 ·
What is Senator Feinstein's agenda??




^^^^To go down in history^^^^^^^^

As the most ignorant and foolish Senator in the history of the United States of America.
 
#22 ·
I think she eventually wants to outlaw most every type weapon. So in the end will be allowed to have a derringer and that's all. Only reason we would get that is so they can say we didn't take away your right to keep and bear arms.
she'll come after derringers, too, once she decides that their barrels are too short
 
#27 ·
They are going to to ask that everyone register not the guns but the people....... then the guns. The whole point is that after a generation or 2 all guns will be gone. This is just a step in the program of disarming America. This country will eventually be a police state. Make no mistake these people want to effect real change in our government. They arent screwing around. life as we know it is going to be a thing of the past. We will all work for the gevernment. Pretty obviouse why she wants to keep all government people armed thats to control us. You have to look long term to see where all this is going. What will be the effects of her laws 25 years from now/ Get that picture in your mind. You think they care about the economy/ No! just look at how many firearm related bis. there is in your state they will all suffer if her laws get past us. Billions of dollars here and world wide.
R
 
#28 ·
Her agenda is much more than just banning guns and other weapons.
The agenda of all liberals is to turn this Free Republic into a Socialistic/Communistic dictatorship.

Getting rid of guns is generally one of the first steps toward this.

If this is not recognized by the majority of citizens soon it may be too late to stop.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top