November 9th, 2006 09:51 AM
Well, if it's on the Internet, than it has to be true
Originally Posted by ExSoldier
You know, I could quite possibly be the most pessimistic person on this board. Being such, I would just like to say that if gun control was a part of my agenda, and I wanted to make sure my officials (that zealously tote the party line) were to be elected, nowhere would gun control be mentioned during the election. Especially if there is a chance gullible gun owners can be swayed into voting democrat because of their disdain in Bush. Only after we've became the house majority, can we "spring the trap", as it were.
As I said before, mark my words, the next televised school shooting, the democrats will make the 2nd Amendment and gun control their new focus, especially with their new house speaker.
The 2nd Amendment gets away unschathed? Hardly... it's only a matter of time till all of their players are positioned, will they attack.
November 9th, 2006 10:00 AM
I trust the NRA and their ratings as far as I can pick up the HQ building and throw it. Quite Frankly the NRA doesn't care about your rights. They care about "hunting" and "sporting purposes". They cave way to often.
Originally Posted by Blackeagle
November 9th, 2006 10:05 AM
Actually I think I have you beat on the pessimism. I hate to think this way, but quite frankly I hope for the best and plan for the worst - hence as soon as I have more funds, I will add greatly to my "museum" via private sale.
Originally Posted by razorblade
November 9th, 2006 10:40 AM
Goawayfarm - Hey guy, don't sugar coat it, tells us what you REALLY think.
By the way, I agree with you 127%!
Whether things turn out bad or not, we need to plan for the worst. The liberal leadership hasn't changed its collective opinion about the Second Amendment, they have just been laying low.
I predict that during the next two years one of two things will happen: 1) the liberals will lay low so as not to jeapordize the 2008 election and then if they keep congress and take the Presidency, they will be back with a gun control vengence OR 2) they will return to the "sensible gun control" over the two years.
Either way, we CANNOT relax. In the same way we carry a firearm and hope we don't need it, we need to keep vigilent with regard to the Dems and hope we are wrong.
Stay safe out there.
November 9th, 2006 10:58 AM
goawayfarm is right. The NRA and several pro-gun folks were deceived this time by wolves in sheeps' clothing. Those democrats who garnered votes, and subsequent victory, by telling those naive enough to believe them that they were pro-2nd Amendment will reveal their true nature as soon as the White House is theirs in 2008.
"Society never advances. It recedes as fast on one side as it gains on the other. It undergoes continual change; but this change is not [an improvement]. For everything that is given, something is taken."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
November 9th, 2006 11:34 AM
Self-labeled is correct because real Libertarians are opposed to all gun control.
Originally Posted by madmax2976
...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller
November 9th, 2006 12:46 PM
The anti's are celebrating, so DON'T get complacent!
The Antis are seeing this election as new life for their cause. So everybody should wake up & smell wants being shoveled & it ain't pretty. Call it pessimistic if you want, but no matter want a liberal says to get elected......look at WHO SUPPORTS them! These anti groups will be the first ones in line to collect from those that got elected.
"Republicans got what they deserved, but did we?"
"Guns, Wars, and History: Election Analysis"
"Candidates for Tougher Gun Laws are Winning Dramatically"
"A National Momentum Shift: Supporters of Common Sense Gun Laws Win Races From Coast to Coast"
"Brady Campaign: Wave of Positive Results for Supporters of Sensible Gun Laws Continues in More Victories"
"Pennsylvania, Political Upsets Give Momentum for Push to Toughen Gun Laws"
"Advocates for Assault Weapons Ban Sweep Close Contests In Maryland"
On a personal note....shame on ANYBODY who allows themselves to be deceived by a liberal politician. I know people voted for liberals for what they perceive as failure by the RINOs. However the answer is not going more to the left!
I also realize things don't appear well in Iraq, no war ever does goes well. (I have a daughter & son-in-law over there now, so I do have a clue.) So the country's answer was to punish RINOs, they deserve it, they aren't protecting our borders, they are spending like crazy.......but the answer is NOT electing liberals who WILL BE WORSE.
Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.-Seneca
"If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. If I have a gun, what do I have to be paranoid about?" -Clint Smith
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Jeff Cooper
November 9th, 2006 12:48 PM
What we need to do is pay attention to the bills. We also need to hold onto our pro-gun Democrats and keep on them. We need to have good communication between them and us. We need to keep them closer than ever before because they make the difference between getting Dem bills passed and having them fail. I am glad that only 5% of bills get passed, but we need to keep an eye on every single bill, especially since the Democrats control the agenda.
What I am keeping my eye out for is their push for universal socialist healthcare and sneak in another anti-gun bill in there while we are distracted.
November 9th, 2006 01:18 PM
Is that something that is known because of a demonstrated voting record on the issue, or is it just what they said they believed in order to get elected? The difference will end up being very crucial.
Originally Posted by QKShooter
November 9th, 2006 01:38 PM
Exactly. 100% accurate assessment. It's ridiculous to believe that the reason the liberals have been silent on gun control is because they no longer believe in it or want it. They simply knew that efforts at gun control would have been wasted when they didn't control congress.
Originally Posted by PaulG
I noted all during the election that not only did politicians never mention gun control, neither did the news media. Whenever there was a table in a news article about issues, and where the candidates stand on them, gun control was never a bulleted (sorry) item. The news people were complicit in preventing liberals from having to go on record stating a position about gun control. They could have asked the politicians about it, because they know it's still an active social issue; what I feel they were doing was helping liberals skate and not have to either lie and say they don't want gun control furtherance, or come out and be frank and thus alienate lots of Americans.
November 9th, 2006 04:09 PM
Man, I don't want to make light of this subject, but it's just like the movie Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. It is lurking beneigh the surface long enough for all the players to assume their roles. Once everyone is in position, their true intentions will be known. Unfortunantly, this isn't happening in a univirse far, far away
Originally Posted by gimpy
November 9th, 2006 06:52 PM
All I have to say is...
November 19th, 2006 11:11 AM
Make no mistake... the Democrats will ban all guns if they get the chance. Tha best way to control a population is to first disarm it!!!
Originally Posted by goawayfarm
Wake up America!!!
By ExSoldier in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
Last Post: April 11th, 2010, 04:35 PM
By ShawnMoncali in forum Forum News, Feedback, Problems & Comments
Last Post: March 15th, 2010, 11:54 AM
By Captain Crunch in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: February 21st, 2009, 01:34 AM
By sgtD in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
Last Post: November 1st, 2006, 11:43 AM
Search tags for this page
i don't think there is a second amendment right to own a gun. - james carville
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors