2A - CA Gun Grab by Gov't - Assemble in Sacramento April 15th and/or 16th

2A - CA Gun Grab by Gov't - Assemble in Sacramento April 15th and/or 16th

This is a discussion on 2A - CA Gun Grab by Gov't - Assemble in Sacramento April 15th and/or 16th within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; My Comments = Massive Gun Grab Legislation (Dem controlled State House, State Senate and Gov = 'Moon Beam' Jerry Brown, ouch, CA self-inflicted wound X ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: 2A - CA Gun Grab by Gov't - Assemble in Sacramento April 15th and/or 16th

  1. #1
    VIP Member
    Array ANGLICO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    I'm the guy next door that is polite, but does not tell you crap.
    Posts
    3,949

    2A - CA Gun Grab by Gov't - Assemble in Sacramento April 15th and/or 16th

    My Comments = Massive Gun Grab Legislation (Dem controlled State House, State Senate and Gov = 'Moon Beam' Jerry Brown, ouch, CA self-inflicted wound X 3 Terms!) hearings.

    My Comments = If you are in NorCal, and can afford to take a day (or two off) and attend these Protests, please do so. Read the below Bills, they are turning EVERY firearms owner into a potential Felon.


    Bill Summary (what is going to be on the Progressive Anti-Gun Agenda):

    • Assembly Bill 760 - (Dickinson) imposes a sales tax of .05 cents per ammunition component (complete cartridge, bullet or case).

    • Senate Bill 47 - (Yee) expands the definition of “Assault Weapons” to BAN the future sale of rifles that have been designed/sold and are equipped to use the “bullet button” or similar device, requires NEW “assault weapon” registration, requires registration of ALL those semi-auto rifles that are currently possessed to retain legal possession in the future, and subjects these firearms to all other “assault weapons” restrictions.

    • Senate Bill 53 - (DeLeon) requires persons to buy an annual ammunition purchase permit, requires the registration and thumbprint of the purchaser for each ammunition purchase, and bans online and mail order sales of ammunition to Californians.

    • Senate Bill 108 - (Yee) requires mandatory locked storage of firearms within a locked house regardless of whether anyone is present.

    • Senate Bill 127 - (Gaines) Firearms: Would require Dept of State Hospitals and psychotherapists to provide reports on persons who would be prohibited from possession or sale of a firearm to Dept of Justice in electronic form within 24 hours.

    • Senate Bill 293 - (DeSaulnier) bans the sale of conventional handguns, if the Department of Justice approves the sale of “Owner Authorized – Smart” handgun technology.

    • Senate Bill 299 - (DeSaulnier) turns victims of firearm theft into criminals for failing to report the loss of their firearm within 48 hours.

    • Senate Bill 363 - (Wright) Mirrors AB500 provision that all firearms in a household with a prohibited person must be secured in a locked container or locking device.

    • Senate Bill 374 - (Steinberg) expands the definition of “assault weapons” to BAN the future sale of VIRTUALLY ALL semi-auto rifles (including rimfire cartridges) that accept a detachable magazine, requires NEW “assault weapon” registration, requires registration of ALL those semi-auto rifles that are currently possessed to retain legal possession in the future, and subjects these firearms to all other “assault weapons” restrictions.

    • Senate Bill 396 - (Hancock) bans the possession of any magazine with a capacity to accept more than 10 cartridges, including currently legally possessed "grandfathered" large capacity magazines.

    • Senate Bill 475 - (Leno) Firearms sales at the Cow Palace. Would require prior approval of the San Mateo County board of supervisors & City & County of San Francisco in order to allow a event (gun show) that sells firearms or ammunition

    • Senate Bill 567 - (Jackson) changes the technical definition of a shotgun, which would turn all handguns into short-barrel shotguns that are illegal to own.

    • Senate Bill 755 - (Wolk) Firearms prohibited persons. Adds a list of misdemeanors that would trigger the 10 year ban on ownership of firearms or ammunition.

    More information and coordination at: APR 15,16 HEARINGS WE MUST SHOW UP! - Calguns.net
    Last edited by ANGLICO; April 6th, 2013 at 06:20 PM. Reason: Spellin, as usual
    Socialism Kills! Time proven, with a very large body count! We are a Constitutional Republic....... not a Democracy, get it correct!

    Don't be mistaken for a Gecko45: http://lonelymachines.org/mall-ninjas/

    Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14qTdp-Dd30

    ANGLICO Images


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array Harryball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lansing Mi
    Posts
    7,725
    Good Lord. That will work..
    Don"t let stupid be your skill set....

    Never be ashamed of a scar. It simply means, that you were stronger than whatever tried to hurt you......

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,327
    • Define so-called "assault" weapons to be essentially anything with a magazine.
    • Define so-called "assault" weapons to include practically anything in which one pull of the trigger yields one fired cartridge.
    • Define shotguns to be handguns, too.
    • Define prohibited persons to be anyone with a felony or misdemeanor offense.
    • Criminalize darned near everything else, threatening everyone with being a criminal under these new rules. The only non-criminals will be those without guns or ammo.



    Yup. That about does it. Redefine it, and they will come. Asparagus is the new milkshake.

    I'm officially in amazement. The invasion of the body snatchers is in full swing.
    ANGLICO likes this.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array Stevew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    3,512
    I would just move, and that's just what I did.
    smolck likes this.
    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around laws. Plato

  5. #5
    Distinguished Member Array Nmuskier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Upper Michigan
    Posts
    1,734
    I bet criminals are goin to look at some of these laws and say, "Dat law makes allotta sense. Im's gunna obey dat 'un!"

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array rugergunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    789
    Good Lord, that state just purely SUCKS!
    ANGLICO likes this.
    I would rather die on my feet, than to live on my knees.

  7. #7
    VIP Member
    Array Pistology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Coast LA Cty
    Posts
    2,180
    Not good. However, the NRA (or the OP's source) is exaggerating the effect of SB 567 as, "turn[ing] all handguns into short-barrel shotguns that are illegal to own." The bill doesn't change the definition of a shotgun as including its requirement, "to use the energy of the explosive in a fixed shotgun shell". I'm not sure how the definition change makes anything illegal.
    So, at least handguns seem safe from the rabid grabbers... er, those handguns on the DOJ's "safe" gun list, that is.
    Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting a citizen to repel force by force
    when the intervention of society... may be too late to prevent an injury.
    -Blackstone’s Commentaries 145–146, n. 42 (1803) in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    45,482
    WHY would any person or company ever want to stay in Comiefornia?
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

  9. #9
    VIP Member Array smolck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    3,534
    Quote Originally Posted by retsupt99 View Post
    WHY would any person or company ever want to stay in Comiefornia?
    I just hope the ones who ruined it stay there and don't bring their liberal crap my way.
    goawayfarm and rugergunner like this.
    As Benjamin Franklin left the hall in Philadelphia, he was asked, “What kind of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin?” He replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

  10. #10
    VIP Member
    Array ANGLICO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    I'm the guy next door that is polite, but does not tell you crap.
    Posts
    3,949
    Quote Originally Posted by smolck View Post
    I just hope the ones who ruined it stay there and don't bring their liberal crap my way.
    Actually, the local news just covered a bunch of Berkely and SF hippies migrating to Alabama this evening.................. (joking - or am I).

    The snake is only killed when the head is cut off.
    Socialism Kills! Time proven, with a very large body count! We are a Constitutional Republic....... not a Democracy, get it correct!

    Don't be mistaken for a Gecko45: http://lonelymachines.org/mall-ninjas/

    Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14qTdp-Dd30

    ANGLICO Images

  11. #11
    Member Array ElkSniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by Pistology View Post
    The bill doesn't change the definition of a shotgun as including its requirement, "to use the energy of the explosive in a fixed shotgun shell". I'm not sure how the definition change makes anything illegal.
    I don't quite understand the above. If they change the definition to be any firearm capable of firing a fixed shotgun shell, then a lot of handguns would fit the definition. There are 'rat' cartridges I've seen advertised in the back of NRA magazines. Also, why change the definition if it dosn't do anything. You can bet the definition change does something, and it's not good.

  12. #12
    Member Array rangefinder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    west Texas
    Posts
    305
    I wonder how long it's going to take for states like CA, NY, NJ, CT and the other gun haters to put up control points to keep their residents in and others out. Papers, papers please.
    ANGLICO and nontechguy like this.
    USN Retired

  13. #13
    VIP Member
    Array Pistology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Coast LA Cty
    Posts
    2,180
    Quote Originally Posted by ElkSniper View Post
    I don't quite understand the above. If they change the definition to be any firearm capable of firing a fixed shotgun shell, then a lot of handguns would fit the definition. There are 'rat' cartridges I've seen advertised in the back of NRA magazines. Also, why change the definition if it dosn't do anything. You can bet the definition change does something, and it's not good.
    LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

    SB 567, as amended, Jackson. Firearms: shotguns.

    Existing law, for purposes of specified provisions, defines shotgun as a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and made or remade to use the energy of the explosive in a fixed shotgun shell to fire through a smooth bore either a number of projectiles (ball shot) or a single projectile for each pull of the trigger.

    This bill would revise the definition of a shotgun to delete the requirement that it be intended to be fired from the shoulder, and would clarify that the projectile may be fired through either a rifled bore or a smooth bore.begin insert This bill would also delete an erroneous cross-reference.
    Shot shell cartridges are not shotgun shells. It seems quite a legal stretch, even in California, to say that shot shell cartridges are shotgun shells and so making all (or most?) handguns illegal as short barrelled shotguns. It doesn't make sense. The first and last courts to hear that will throw it out on its ear or I'm outta here. You can bet that. Maybe it's just legal housekeeping?
    I have a request to reactivate my calguns account from whence the OP got the alert. I may carry on the discussion there if and when I am able.

    Quote Originally Posted by rangefinder View Post
    I wonder how long it's going to take for states like CA, NY, NJ, CT and the other gun haters to put up control points to keep their residents in and others out. Papers, papers please.
    Where's the interstate commerce clause when you need it?
    Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting a citizen to repel force by force
    when the intervention of society... may be too late to prevent an injury.
    -Blackstone’s Commentaries 145–146, n. 42 (1803) in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array Cokeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,013
    They will probably all pass. Every stupid law proposed in every stupid state lately has passed. Why not CA? I'm glad I don't live there anymore.
    Glock 23 - CZ 452 ZKM Special - Walther P22
    LMT STD 16 - Mossberg 500A - Kahr P380
    Henry H001Y - Winchester 12
    Smith & Wesson M&P Shield - Mossberg 500B
    Marlin 336Y - Kahr MK9

  15. #15
    VIP Member
    Array ANGLICO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    I'm the guy next door that is polite, but does not tell you crap.
    Posts
    3,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Pistology View Post
    Shot shell cartridges are not shotgun shells. It seems quite a legal stretch, even in California, to say that shot shell cartridges are shotgun shells and so making all (or most?) handguns illegal as short barrelled shotguns. It doesn't make sense. The first and last courts to hear that will throw it out on its ear or I'm outta here. You can bet that. Maybe it's just legal housekeeping?
    I have a request to reactivate my calguns account from whence the OP got the alert. I may carry on the discussion there if and when I am able.


    Where's the interstate commerce clause when you need it?
    Sir,

    I started to write a private message to you.............

    Then I realized that too many US Citizens just don't give a crap about any Rights they have, and especially do not appreciate the 1A. The 2A is only dead when we decide it is.







    i
    Socialism Kills! Time proven, with a very large body count! We are a Constitutional Republic....... not a Democracy, get it correct!

    Don't be mistaken for a Gecko45: http://lonelymachines.org/mall-ninjas/

    Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14qTdp-Dd30

    ANGLICO Images

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

2a weapon
,
ca gun grab
,
ca gun haters
,
ca redefining assault weapons definition- sf chronicle
,
ca sb 396 jerry brown
,
calguns bersa 22
,
cali assembly stop gun grab
,

california gun grab

,
california new gun grab bill
,

sb 396 calguns

,
sb bill handguns be capable of shooting snake shot being banned as short barrel shotguns
,
up coming april cow palace gun show
Click on a term to search for related topics.