Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
This is a discussion on Animal Farm NY Style within the The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; State lawmakers seek to exempt retired cops from new gun restrictions On Thursday, the New York State Assembly approved a bill that would allow retired ...
State lawmakers seek to exempt retired cops from new gun restrictions
On Thursday, the New York State Assembly approved a bill that would allow retired police to keep assault weapons and high-capacity magazines they purchased during their time on the force.
State lawmakers seek to exempt retired cops from new gun restrictions - NY Daily News
Do not get me wrong, I am not anti LEO by any stretch but a retired LEO is a private citizen. Why would such need anything that Joe Schmukatelli next door is not allowed to own?
The bill sponsor said- “We put this bill forward in order to make sure retired police officers have the firepower they need in the situations where it is necessary,” Lentol said. What kind of situations are former NY LEOs getting into?
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor liberty to purchase power.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Are retired cops any more qualified to handle weapons than retired marines, or civillian range instructors? Are they less likely to suffer mental breakdowns than firemen and bus drivers? Where do they come up with this stuff?
I don't always have nothing to say, but when I do, I post it on Facebook.
Ironically, that logic the bill's sponsor is promoting is exactly what justifies scrapping the whole 2A-infringing edifice we've constructed, including such "class" distinctions between folks deemed to have valid reasons to carry and the unwashed (whose reason of protecting life and limb isn't considered sufficient cause).
None is more equal than others ... Animal Farm, indeed, with a heavy dose of 1984 tossed in for good measure.
How dare you disparage the Animals like that!
Retired USAF E-8. Official forum curmudgeon.
Lighten up and enjoy life because:
Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... Buffalo Springfield - For What It's Worth
It would seem to me that someone retired from the military would be far more qualified than retired LEO`s
Gun control, the ability to hit your target
So, retired LEO's will be allowed to protect their families, but the rest of the populace are expendable.
So glad I do not live in NY.
"I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."
"A lot of phonies in the world who portray themselves as "victims". It takes a great deal of discernment to know they are fake."
I have great respect for those who have served as active law enforcement officers. However after they retire they are once again simply citizens, and they deserve all the rights and privileges (and responsibilities) of being American citizens. If it is deemed that retired LEOs are deserving of being able to carry out their lives unabated by restrictive gun laws, then ALL law abiding citizens should have the same right to do so. Just the opinion of this simple American citizen.
There is certainly no shortage of stupidity in NY government...
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." --Benjamin Franklin
"Ignorance can be treated with education, sadly there is no cure for stupidity."
I, too, am pro-cop and a law and order type of guy. But what is good for one group of citizens is good for all. Why is it that one group is allowed tools to defend themselves but others are not? Can anyone say POLICE STATE?
It's politics. Since I retired my most frequent carry is a pair of five shot revolvers(I am phasing in a Glock). Do I run across my former clientele? Of course. This isn't about that it's about politicians getting endorsements from police unions and being seen as LEO friendly.