i know i`m preaching to the choir here as i`m sure that all the members of this forum are more or less pro gun.
some interesting findings for a study done by the Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, under the directive of the Centers for Disease Control done as part of the Executive Orders signed by President Obama earlier this year in the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings.
i know i`m preaching to the choirs here as i`m sure that all the members of this forum are more or less pro gun.
some interesting findings for a study done by the Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, under the directive of the Centers for Disease Control done as part of the Executive Orders signed by President Obama earlier this year in the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings.
well it would appear that your quiche was left in the oven too long and has shriveled into a piece of charcoal that strangely resembles a Smith & Wesson M&P :tongue:
This administration will not let facts get in the way of their agenda and that has been demonstrated over and over again. Denial, diversion and discrediting are the tools of the trade here.
One thing to remember, before you go spouting numbers and statistics based on this report you need to make sure you READ the ENTIRE report. There are also many points made in the anti gun position and you need to be able to respond to those points in the report if you use the pro gun points. At least you won't be blindsided when asked about those points.
No better way to look the fool than to not know the other side of the coin you flip.
yes, report contains findings that support both sides, as should any unbiased studies. what i was trying to point out are the parts that debunk the most common myths used by antis. that guns are more likely to kill a family member and that a gun carried for SD will most likely be used against the victim.
Wasn't it Obummer who said politics should never get in the way of science when it comes to "global warming?" Well since we'll never hear a word about this study from him, aren't his politics getting in the way of this little scientific gem? Hypocrite!!!
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Defensive Carry
5.4M posts
117.5K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to defensive firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about everyday carry, optics, holsters, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!